From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
Editor Review: done
|
I have done an editor review for you at Wikipedia:Editor review/.
Perhaps you could consider doing a review of another editor? It takes a bit of time (reviews can take anywhere from about 15 minutes up to 2 hours, depending on how many contributions the editor has made, where they have contributed, etc).
The ones marked with a * are those editors who have not been reviewed yet — if you want to review one of these, make sure you remove the asterisks in the parts indicated!
If you have not done a review before, you might feel more comfortable giving a second review to an editor — this will show you an example of a review that has been done, and show you the kinds of things that can be commented on.
I hope that you find the review useful. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions about it.
Regards,
|
|
Overview
This template is for informing an editor that you have done a review for them at Wikipedia:Editor review.
It needs to be SUBSTituted, or an error will be generated.
Please note that if this is not placed on the user's main talk page, the link to the editor review may not work unless an alternative location is provided.
Your signature is automatically added to the box.
Syntax
{{subst:User:Phantomsteve/er-done[|location=alternative location][|backlog=<non-blank>][|new=<non-blank>]}}
Variables
- location=alternative location:
- If the review is not at [[Wikipedia:Editor review/<user name>]], this can be used to give the location (e.g. Username 2) - do not include the
Wikipedia:Editor review or the square brackets.
- If there is a backlog (i.e. the request is older than a couple of weeks), this can be used to add Sorry for the delay in getting one done — we are slowly catching up with the backlog! to the message
- If the editor is a relatively new one (perhaps less than 1000 edits), this can be used to prevent the suggestion of reviewing another user being shown.
Examples
Basic use
{{subst:User:Phantomsteve/er-done}}
Editor Review: done
|
|
I have done an editor review for you at Wikipedia:Editor review/Phantomsteve/er-done.
Perhaps you could consider doing a review of another editor? It takes a bit of time (reviews can take anywhere from about 15 minutes up to 2 hours, depending on how many contributions the editor has made, where they have contributed, etc).
The ones marked with a * are those editors who have not been reviewed yet — if you want to review one of these, make sure you remove the asterisks in the parts indicated!
If you have not done a review before, you might feel more comfortable giving a second review to an editor — this will show you an example of a review that has been done, and show you the kinds of things that can be commented on.
I hope that you find the review useful. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions about it.
Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 01:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
|
|
With new
{{subst:User:Phantomsteve/er-done|new=yes}}
Editor Review: done
With alternative location and backlog
{{subst:User:Phantomsteve/er-done|location=Username 2|backlog=yes}}
Editor Review: done
|
|
I have done an editor review for you at Wikipedia:Editor review/Username 2. Sorry for the delay in getting one done — we are slowly catching up with the backlog!
Perhaps you could consider doing a review of another editor? It takes a bit of time (reviews can take anywhere from about 15 minutes up to 2 hours, depending on how many contributions the editor has made, where they have contributed, etc).
The ones marked with a * are those editors who have not been reviewed yet — if you want to review one of these, make sure you remove the asterisks in the parts indicated!
If you have not done a review before, you might feel more comfortable giving a second review to an editor — this will show you an example of a review that has been done, and show you the kinds of things that can be commented on.
I hope that you find the review useful. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions about it.
Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 01:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
|
|
