The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
Yiddish is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish cultureTemplate:WikiProject Jewish cultureJewish culture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present.
Digitized Yiddish Titles accuracy
I work at the Yiddish book center. The numbers being provided are incorrect. There are between 40,000-60,000 titles in published Yiddish literature, not 20,000. “Over half” is a false statement, which was the believed number a decade ago, but this has since changed drastically. 24.34.21.66 (talk) 17:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
David Mazower is one of the main directors of the YBC. In one of our recent publications, Bridge of Books, he writes:
"Despite the exciting surge of new translations in recent years, the vast majority of Yiddish books—numbering somewhere between 40,000 and 60,000 titles, including outstanding works of fiction and nonfiction—remain inaccessible to all but the relatively small number of Yiddish readers."
This information is significantly more readily available in our building. I can provide photos of information panels when I go into work tomorrow. 24.34.21.66 (talk) 18:24, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just to clarify, the number of digitized titles has only increased from 10,000+ to 11,000+; it is the proportion of total works that have been digitized that is inaccurate. 24.34.21.66 (talk) 18:31, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There isn't an independent source for the original claim either. It is just a link to our own Internet Archive page's description. 24.34.21.66 (talk) 15:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think this is fine since the new text is cited to an updated version of the original citation. I reverted the IP because of the phrasing "sixth and a quarter" which seemed like drive by vandalism (apologies!) but that's not the case. RegentsPark (comment) 15:35, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Great, thank you! And I recognize how without the sources, it definitely could be taken for vandalism. Thanks for being keen and glad we could sort it out easily :) 24.34.21.66 (talk) 15:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]