User talk:Johnmaxmena

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Vintage base ball. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by some search engines, including Google. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. General external links about vintage base ball are ok. External links to specific teams are not ok. Such links should be listed on Wikipedia articles of said teams. Kingturtle (talk) 17:21, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for all the awesome additions! CyMoahk (talk) 03:57, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am writing/translating articles on WPS and WPS players in Japanese Wikipedia. At first I thank you for uploading lots of valuable photos.

I would like you to have all the photos upload on Wikimedia Commons so that all the wikipedians (including myself) can use the photos you offered in the articles of non-English Wikipedia. I would be so happy if you accepted my request. --Ohtani tanya (talk) 04:56, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello John. It's exactly my words. Could you help us to improve our wikis too? Thanks and regards. Mwaldeck (talk) 21:39, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some of them, I can move to Commons, because you put "public domain", but some you can change or stipulate the license. Thanks again and regards. Mwaldeck (talk) 21:45, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up the great work. As I'm sure you've seen, I've been working with a number of the WPS player pages. If you could add pictures to all of them (I noticed Angela Hucles as a glaring omission), that would be awesome. I was thinking, since you took team photos it seems like, just crop them for the individual players and place them in. If you don't know how to do a good looking format or something along those lines, don't worry, I'll clean up the articles for you. Just want to make sure all the WPS players have proper pictures! GauchoDude (talk) 05:25, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Team_Athletcia2009.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:24, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Fredbirdzoom.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 05:49, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Gleenbrummer.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 05:49, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject St. Louis Cardinals, let me begin by saying welcome to Wikipedia! I recently noticed the really great pictures of Ozzie Smith you have uploaded. I can't tell you what a relief it is to finally have a free-use picture from his playing days available...Thank you so much!! That said, I'd like to make a request similar to that Ohtani tanya. It would be really cool if you could upload or move these pictures to Wikimedia Commons. As it says on the english Eikipedia upload page, "Items uploaded to the Commons can be used on Wikipedia and elsewhere, helping to create a central repository of free images and multimedia. If you have a unified login, you can use it at Commons." Regardless, I can't express my gratitude enough that you would volunteer your unique and outstanding pictures so that other people can learn more about Ozzie Smith hopefully well into the future. Cheers, Monowi (talk) 04:56, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You claimed to have uploaded images to the commons that I deleted. Only administrators can delete images and all your commons images look fine to me. Your English Wikipedia images, i.e., images uploaded here, were tagged by me as missing copyright tags indicating that the copyright status was unknown and that is why they were deleted. The image logs, like this one, shows the exact history and proves I did not delete your images but shows the reason they were deleted. Upon reuploading, you did add a copyright tag and those images look fine now. In future please remember to provide all the information in the upload page but if you do get any deletion notices, follow the links and fix the problem and all will be well otherwise they too may be deleted and you don't really want that. Cheers ww2censor (talk) 05:26, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Karina LeBlanc.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:58, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Vintage2007baseball.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:01, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MikeRamsey1983.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 08:15, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:Al Trost 2008.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:30, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Johnmaxmena. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Vintage Base Ball Player Scores.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Davidgreen1983.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:David Greenwiki 1983.jpg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 06:12, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]