Talk:COVID-19 pandemic in India

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the COVID-19 pandemic in India article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Viruses B‑class High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Disaster management Start‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. India: Andhra Pradesh / Delhi / Haryana / Jammu and Kashmir / Karnataka / Kerala / Maharashtra / Punjab / Rajasthan / Tamil Nadu / Uttar Pradesh / Telangana / History B‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject Andhra Pradesh (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Delhi (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Haryana (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Jammu and Kashmir (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Karnataka (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Punjab (India) (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Rajasthan (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Uttar Pradesh (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Telangana (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Medicine: Pulmonology Start‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Pulmonology task force.

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Section sizes Section size for COVID-19 pandemic in India (68 sections) Section name Byte count Section total (Top) 12,832 12,832 Timeline 331 43,695 2020 10,749 10,749 2021: Second wave 28,185 28,185 2022 1,219 1,219 2023 3,211 3,211 Response 186 152,818 Health care and testing 6,526 73,861 Initial testing 4,100 4,100 Expansion of tests 9,314 9,314 Testing community transmission 5,254 5,254 Daily samples tested 9,169 9,169 Research and treatment 15,340 15,340 Vaccine development and production 8,785 8,785 Vaccination policy and distribution 15,373 15,373 Immediate relief 421 14,684 Welfare 6,050 6,050 Economic relief and stimulus package 8,213 8,213 Lockdowns 55 17,072 First wave: Nation-wide 13,147 13,147 Second wave: State-wise and localized 3,870 3,870 Administration, committees and task forces 15,738 15,738 Pseudoscience practices 1,157 1,157 Military 4,919 4,919 Private sector 4,392 4,392 International 22 13,866 International support 13,844 13,844 Response shortages and criticism 6,943 6,943 Evacuations by India related to the COVID-19 pandemic 208 47,094 Background 20 6,159 COVID-19 pandemic 2,712 2,712 Migration 1,470 1,470 Previous evacuations 1,957 1,957 International 22 31,092 January–April 2020 10,762 10,762 May 2020–present: Vande Bharat Mission 3,515 3,515 Phase I 7,582 7,582 Phase II 2,609 2,609 Phase III 650 650 Phase IV 1,483 1,483 Phase V 1,759 1,759 Phase VI 363 363 Phase VII 526 526 Samudra Setu II 1,821 1,821 Domestic 1,415 1,415 Reception 6,599 6,599 Incidents 19 1,621 Air India Express Flight 1344 565 565 Air India Flight AI-312 27-Aug Fiasco 1,037 1,037 Impact 14 71,300 Displacement of migrant workers 7,705 7,705 Drug shortages 4,026 4,026 Education 5,638 5,638 Economy 7,688 7,688 Freedom of expression 3,305 3,305 Other diseases 2,823 2,823 Healthcare and frontline workers 6,460 6,460 Religion 7,978 7,978 Rural and semi-rural India 4,799 4,799 Transport 9,102 9,102 Other 11,762 11,762 Statistics 1,538 12,596 Undercounting of cases and deaths 11,058 11,058 See also 287 287 Notes 263 263 References 33 33 Further reading 2,391 2,391 External links 2,162 2,162 Total 345,471 345,471

Title should be 'COVID 19 outbreak in India'. Souniel Yadav (talk) 06:49, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Souniel Yadav: The title is in sync with actual issue 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. I think the title is apt for now. Change not required. SaiP (talk) 09:52, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see that Indians in Diamond Princess are also counted in the infobox but is it right? As we are stating India in location, we should use this count to only cases inside Indian territory. Others can be mentioned elsewhere the article. It is too cluttered as it now. Shanze1 (talk) 14:56, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

66 Amol845 (talk) 17:35, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Total confirm cases increases to 66 as there is an increase in the number of cases in maharashtra to 11 Amol845 (talk) 17:37, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please, Indian friends, you ought to create a box with the cases per state in India. It must be well documented to outside reliable sources and that would make it much easier to grasp the information in the article. Something like this:

Kerala - 3 cases;

Goa - 0 cases; ... and so forth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.71.87.106 (talk) 19:51, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to whoever did something better than I did. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.71.87.106 (talk) 22:17, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Andhra Pradesh: [1]
• Assam: [2]
• Bihar: [3]
• Goa: [4]
• Gujarat: [5]
• Himachal Pradesh: [6]
• Jammu and Kashmir: [7]
• Karnataka: [8]
• Madhya Pradesh: [9]
• Maharashtra: [10]
• Manipur: [11]
• Odisha: [12]
• Punjab: [13]
• Tamil Nadu: [14]
• West Bengal: [15]

-M4DU7 (talk) 03:21, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please could National Institute of Virology, National Centre for Disease Control and Strategic Health Operations Centre find a place in this article. DTM (talk) 12:34, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can we trace out the state of the 4th recovered person so that the data table can also be updated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soubamcha (talk • contribs) 12:17, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done Mayankj429 (talk) 12:52, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The recovered patients is 10 not 11 Amol845 (talk) 19:14, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update required. 1 more case reported in pune related to the two cases reported earlier today. GarvitMalik (talk) 15:33, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request to 2020 coronavirus outbreak in India has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

official website {src="https://www.mohfw.gov.in/"} 2409:4040:41D:B64:0:0:185B:10AC (talk) 20:38, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. To reply, copy and paste this: {{replyto|Can I Log In}}(Talk) 23:05, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TOTAL CASES 63 ACTIVE CASES 60 ( 3 RECOVERED)

• Confirmed by health minister of india

Please Update the data Daljit8 (talk) 07:50, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done : Please provide reliable source. Mayankj429 (talk) 08:24, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone provide me the rationale behind an extended confirmed protection? I have seen the disruptive editing episodes but even the main page is only semi-protected. For an article that documents a current event with rapidly changing information, a WP:ECP status is rather limiting. We need as many hands as possible to keep the content up to date. Yes, that also mean constant error checking by the editors. – StreetSoda_{talk 14:24, 11 March 2020 (UTC)}[reply]

@Streetsoda: : As per WP:RPP request it was requested to protect it due to IP and new accounts vandalism.

This the exact convo. from there :- Semi-protection: - IPs and new accounts are adding fake information and rumours. M4DU7 (talk) 07:42, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment This article now under Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions when writing a page about India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan (see WP:ARBIPA) so it is necessary for this article to be semi-protected. 36.77.94.26 (talk) 10:05, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. N.J.A. | talk 14:46, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. N.J.A. | talk 14:46, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Either protection is open to review for appropriateness by any user and or admin, N.J.A. | talk 14:46, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) @NJA: From my understanding of WP:ARBIPA and WP:ACDS extended confirmed protection is appropriate for this situation (if I am wrong please correct me). If an admin wants to use EC + PC I would recommend extending PC to two months that way IP and new accounts would need their edits reviewed after the EC ends. Alucard 16_{❯❯❯ chat?} 00:59, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging account whom requested for semiprotection @M4DU7:

Mayankj429 (talk) 14:47, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I too think it should be semiprotected with auto-confirmed access required.

It will helpfull. Mayankj429 (talk) 14:51, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• I am OK with any sort of protection as long as it prevents IP addresses and new accounts from adding random numbers and misleading information. M4DU7 (talk) 21:36, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request to 2020 coronavirus outbreak in India has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Confirm cases 62 Amol845 (talk) 14:07, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Amol845: Total confirmed cases are 60 as per the ministry of health & family welfare website. Data from Worldometer is not entirely reliable at present. – StreetSoda_{talk 15:39, 11 March 2020 (UTC)}[reply]

This edit request to 2020 coronavirus outbreak in India has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change confirm cases to 65 Amol845 (talk) 16:05, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Amol845: Please provide a reliable source per the above. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 16:12, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

if we are using MoHFW or worldometers or BNO or JHU, we should be consistent. Also , i'm not sure the MoHFW is update in realtime, the data always seems to lag the other sources. Often this page doesn't match the main wiki page either. Can we discuss what source we are using ? Gegu0284 (talk) 17:58, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Gegu0284: currently it is inconsistent and not much people are editing here after this article have been locked for extended users only and i do think semiprotection to be decreased for autoconfirmed users. And for the source Main article is using worldometer so to be in sink, i recommend we should use that as source. Mayankj429 (talk) 18:14, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• The MoHFW source is definitely lagging behind by a day. But the real problem is, some of the news sources are using this MoHFW number thinking that it is up to date, which in turn causes a mistake in their own real-time count.
• Worldometers table has been showing India's count as 62 for the past 24 hours, making me believe that either it copies the number from our main page table (which has also been 62 for the past 24 hours) or doesn't update the number regularly.
• John Hopkins updates the numbers within a few hours, so it is better than the above two sources when it comes to updated numbers.
• Among news sources, I have noticed that only The Hindu is able to make the distinction between state-reported cases and the lagging MoHFW confirmed cases [16]. I suggest we use this and show both numbers like the United States outbreak page. M4DU7 (talk) 21:34, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@M4DU7: @Gegu0284:

• Seeing the confusion around it is best to follow official numbers from Mohfw as this is sensetive issue. They have updated total cases as 73 today. For timeline we can use other sources to expand article.

Mayankj429 (talk) 06:12, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• MoHFW has updated the new number. Please check http://www.mohfw.gov.in/. Could someone change the number? I am unable to edit it. It is now 73 as told above. saputrevu24 06:42, 12 March 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SaiP (talk • contribs)

@M4DU7: @Gegu0284: @Mayankj429:

• Can't we use the news channels as a additional news source? SaiP (talk) 07:01, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SaiP: They can be used but problem was that tommorow, various news sources were showing different no. of cases, varying from 60 to 70 because state goverment declares new cases firstly and then next day Mohfw adds them all and update. Many News sources were adding cases themselves and were missing on some cases, while some were only showing the cases from Mohfw which was 60 tomorrow. Mayankj429 (talk) 07:40, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@M4DU7: @Gegu0284: @Mayankj429: news channels are not reliable; plus we need by state info. We can't say 73 because of worldometers and not have a statewise breakdown. I suggest we show the statewise breakdown as per MoHFW, with a "total according to MoHFW"; but also against the total the Worldometers number as a "current total"

@M4DU7: @Gegu0284: @Mayankj429: - If that's the case, we would have to rely on https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ and http://www.mohfw.gov.in/. We have no other go. And as someone said, we might have to add as per Worldometer, the count is so-and-so and per MoHFW, the count is so-and-so. What do you think guys? In that way, we can keep a sync with the two official government-level sources. SaiP (talk) 08:43, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree use both worldometer and Mohfw in sink to update. -Mayankj429 (talk)

Ok as of now the MoHFW website is correct. Will make the change if the problem reoccurs. Also, I will take out the foreign national footnote since we now have in the table itself Gegu0284 (talk) 09:49, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MoHFW now seems to be updating it regularly, but it is still not real time number. We can use the The Hindu tracker for this purpose as well https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/health/covid-19-interactive-map-confirmed-cases-in-india/article31041690.ece M4DU7 (talk) 12:09, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

India Today covers first 50 cases comprehensively. Use if helpful or to remove too many references. -Nizil (talk) 07:50, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for it. I will see how it can be used to make article better. Mayankj429 (talk) 08:01, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The most reliable source of news in India has a real-time tracker with an interactive map - https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/health/covid-19-interactive-map-confirmed-cases-in-india/article31041690.ece This can be used to update the number of confirmed cases in real time. M4DU7 (talk) 12:07, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• @M4DU7: : Seems reliable, can be used with keeping Mohfw as a secondary source as well in my opinion. - Mayankj429 (talk) 12:18, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Added both in a similar way as that of the United States outbreak article. M4DU7 (talk) 12:37, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mayankj429: What would be the primary source then?

@Mayankj429: @M4DU7: Can we use news from twitter verified accounts them as source and add here as a reference? What do you think guys? Off late, there is so much traffic on twitter.

@SaiP: - Twitter is not considered reliable source for most of the time for Wikipedia, to know more see WP:TWITTER - Mayankj429 (talk) 13:24, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

•@M4DU7: @Mayankj429: The number in the hindu live tracker does not seem to match with the interactive map count. Can we rely on it? The Headline shows 78. But when sum up the count in each based on the interactive map, it totals up to 74. SaiP (talk) 17:07, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just counted it and it adds up to 78. The Hindu is definitely reliable. M4DU7 (talk) 10:01, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have added as much cases to timeline which I could find. Still 3 cases are missing as per total by goverment and after looking to time line and Mohfw data i found that 1 from Delhi, 1 from UP, and 1 from Ladakh are the three cases for which we don't have news sources, I do have a guess that 1 ladakh case is the Iran pilgrimage case who was previously a suspected case. So can anyone help and add these 3 cases with source to timeline.It will be helpfull. Thanks - Mayankj429 (talk) 12:08, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mayankj429: - I will search and add it here. SaiP (talk) 13:03, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can we add a graph that shows the number of new cases added per day? It will help to show the growth rate. Azimuthrosie (talk) 13:50, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on one right now Shanze1 (talk) 14:00, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Shanze1: - Their is problem in mobile version with the graph, it just shows a blank box. I don't know much about graphs on wikipedia. Can you again have a look on it? Thanks - Mayankj429 (talk) 14:11, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is an older template so there's no mobile support I guess. There is another modern one called Template:Graph:Chart but I can't get it working earlier (they're are on many other pages though). I'll try it again, see if can. Shanze1 (talk) 14:14, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done now. Shanze1 (talk) 14:58, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Shanze1: Thanks for the efforts :) - Mayankj429 (talk) 15:14, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First death in India reported in Karnataka Angunnu (talk) 17:38, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done _ Mayankj429 (talk) 17:52, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• The sensex crashed 2919 points and Nifty fall to 9590, worst fall since 2017 due to corona virus^[1]. There are high chances for the cancellation of Indian Premier League in 2020 due to corona virus^[2]

Partially Done - Updated Imapct on Stock market. No official confirmation of IPL to be cancelled till now, so wait for BCCI to confirm the future of IPL, Thanks. - Mayankj429 (talk) 05:35, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• You could also update about today's news where the BSE SENSEX and NIFTY 50 stock indices were stopped for 45-minute due to their rapid falling which was caused investors' fear and sentiment caused by this global pandemic. I think this is an important update. ^[1] SaiP (talk) 12:12, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whoever updating the article should simultaneously update the following articles so it would be easy to maintain the updates across the articles:-Nizil (talk) 07:23, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Timeline of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic in March 2020
• Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data/India medical cases chart
• Template:2020 coronavirus pandemic in India by state and union territories
• Domestic responses to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic#India
• Socio-economic impact
  • aviation and tourism
  • cinema and television
  • Events cancelled
  • 2020 stock market crash
  • sports
  • Travel restrictions
• Xenophobia and racism

Please update the following article as well - 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Asia SaiP (talk) 14:38, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request to 2020 coronavirus pandemic in India has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

the total cases have reached 79 according to source. 117.241.39.154 (talk) 09:48, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: No it has not changed. Shanze1 (talk) 09:59, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline expansion is becoming hectic and do need more hands. Its not possible to track every case now as they are increasing day by day. So what we should be doing now - 1) Only update summary of the day with no. of new cases reported by each state. 2) Same as before. Any other suggestions welcome - Mayankj429 (talk) 13:32, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing wrong with only summary. Can go in detail when its a special case for now. We can always expand and perform copy edits later when things calm down (soon hopefully). Shanze1 (talk) 13:40, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mayankj429: I can give a helping hand. But I don't have access. I could only post updates here if you would like. SaiP (talk) 18:22, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SaiP: : Thanks, any help apperciated. Page is protected from IP users and autoconfirmed accounts due to sensitiveness of the issue, i.e. extended confirmed users having 500 edits can edit the page. So, any updates on talk page with sources will be considered. - Mayankj429 (talk) 18:31, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request to 2020 coronavirus pandemic in India has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The number of patient recovered is changed from 11 to 10 As per ministry of health and welfare of india Amol845 (talk) 19:12, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. MrClog (talk) 19:40, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please correct the following spelling errors under the timeline section:

• 2nd March > Second sentence "totaling" should be totalling
• 11th March > Last sentence "retruned" should be returned
• 13th March > Second sentence "Banglore" should be Bangalore
• 13th March > Last sentence "evacuted" should be evacuated

Zack1455 (talk) 02:57, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Note because this article is written in Indian English, any editors who want to add and update new information must be ensure that the information is written in Indian English, which according to WP:ENGVAR stats any articles that are subject to English-speaking nations or any countries that varieties of English already established, like India, should use that English in respective nations. 36.77.93.158 (talk) 04:24, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done: Thanks. Shanze1 (talk) 04:33, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly add closure for schools at Manipur in respective section.^[1]

 Done

Please update link for Karnataka in table [2020 coronavirus pandemic in India by state and union territory] New page is created for karnataka similar to kerala page "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_coronavirus_pandemic_in_Karnataka" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prasannatb (talk • contribs) 11:28, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - Mayankj429 (talk) 14:17, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request to 2020 coronavirus pandemic in India has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

- In March 14th of the timeline, add: Two persons who had returned from Dubai test positive for coronavirus in Maharashtra's Yavatmal.

- Move total count to 86.

Source: https://www.thequint.com/news/breaking-news/novel-coronavirus-covid-19-global-india-outbreak-latest-news-live-updates Hardeepasrani (talk) 13:14, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hardeepasrani (talk)

 Done Thanks for the update. - Mayankj429 (talk) 14:00, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Others and @Mayankj429: Don't you think we need to categorize the cases into Infected and Spread-infected? I feel most of the cases as of now are due to spread of the disease by victims who came from abroad. There is very sharp rise in cases due to that. SaiP (talk) 14:45, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SaiP: - It have become hard now to keep track of each case. Till now, we have been writing, if case have been from abroad or it have been spread here in India. - Mayankj429 (talk) 15:01, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request to 2020 coronavirus pandemic in India has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/coronavirus-live-news-updates-total-coronavirus-cases-in-india-rise-to-83/liveblog/74620072.cms 2405:204:283:6D23:179B:5E16:D9ED:E863 (talk) 15:36, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Unclear. Please be more specific with the request. Shanze1 (talk) 17:12, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request to 2020 coronavirus pandemic in India has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

106.66.37.197 (talk) 18:09, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Coronavirus is also known as Wuhan400 a biological warhead as per book named 'Eyes of darkness ' say 'Wuhan400 /COVID19/coronavius'

 Not done - Unclear. Please be specific with what change you want to make. - Mayankj429 (talk) 19:09, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The statement about wrath of Allah on Chinese is ineligible. It's nothing more than some non-noted person uttering about Chinese for persecution of Uighurs. The statement is barely of anything consequential or note.

When I search about Ilyas Sharafuddin he seems to hve very few real news worthy items related to his name. His only real presence seems to be on debates or some sensationalist channels like Times Now overamplifying his statement as news-worthy when only very very few sites, including some that are not even about reliable or real news have highlighted it.

Being an Indian I know all too well how some organizations will cover just about anything to get a "story" even if it's not really news-worthy. Why should some Muslim cleric or any religious figure's irrelevant statement should be included? Please consider removing.

It cannot be called xenophobia or racism in any manner. Belief in divine justice doesn't equate to that, even if it's about someone in another country. Totally irrelevant and unrelated statement. SainiRori (talk) 21:13, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not too many cases still in the state that requires a separate article. Can be covered in the India article. Titodutta (talk) 23:05, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any issues having separate articles by states. Kerala already has one. Rather, Maharashtra also needs one has confirmed cases are 31 and counting. Shyam ^(T/C) 02:31, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is requested that an edit be made to the extended-confirmed-protected redirect at 2020 coronavirus pandemic in India. (edit · history · last · links · protection log) This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y". The edit may be made by any extended confirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{EEp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

Evacuations should include those from Japan of 124 people on 27th February 2020, second batch of 44 people from Iran on 13th March 2020 and 234 people from Iran on 15th March 2020. Sources of these are publicly available on PIB's website under the section press releases by Ministry of Health Family Welfare, India. Check the following link : https://pib.gov.in/PressReleseDetail.aspx?PRID=1606408 Markelonn (talk) 00:17, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is requested that an edit be made to the extended-confirmed-protected redirect at 2020 coronavirus pandemic in India. (edit · history · last · links · protection log) This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y". The edit may be made by any extended confirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{EEp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

Evacuations should include that of 211+7 passengers from Milan, Italy. The source can be checked from the tweet by External Affairs Minister of India. Markelonn (talk) 00:24, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]