Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royal Flush Gang

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Buidhe (talk | contribs) at 04:40, 7 March 2020 (Royal Flush Gang: Closed as keep (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Merge can be discussed outside of AfD. (non-admin closure) buidhe 04:40, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Flush Gang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A fictional organization that seems to fail WP:NFICTION/GNG. I can't find anything that goes beyond WP:PLOT summary / list of appearances in media. They did recently appear on TV (Arrow) but I don't see anything about the group, some semi-related discussion about casting and such is not directly related to the notability of this entity. The best source I see is [1] and it is really a fancruft/trivia level. Few mentions in books are basically short plot summaries as well. Can anyone find anything better to rescue this? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:37, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:37, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This shows per WP:NEXIST that reliable non-fiction sources exist, which demonstrates notability. Many of them discuss plot-related information, but it's necessary when writing about fictional characters to describe their plot function in the context of the narrative as a whole. The article could use more work to cut down the overly-long plot summaries, but WP:ARTN says that the current state of the article does not affect the subject's notability. -- Toughpigs (talk) 21:40, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.