Talk:Non-fungible token

Cryptocurrency Start‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptocurrency, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cryptocurrency on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptocurrencyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptocurrencyTemplate:WikiProject CryptocurrencyWikiProject Cryptocurrency articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

This is a fairly new idea right now, so doesn't have as many quality sources as I'd like. However, I've pieced together information from many sources, and general information included in specific related topics. I suspect in the future there will be better quality sources that will come online, and some additional references would need to be added in addition to expanding the article.Btcgeek (talk) 21:57, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm the lead author of ERC-721, ask me anything. Full Decent (talk) 03:37, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Please consider expanding the article (but always with legitimate sources/references, not personal knowledge/opinions) if you can. Wikipedia is really not the best place for an AMA. Btcgeek (talk) 16:15, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There was at one point an exchange called Mint Exchange which sold freshly minted Bitcoins at a 10% premium. We also know the BTC from Wannacry was carefully watched and few users would like to have it. Lastly, we can see that on non-regulated/non-KYC exchanges have Bitcoin trading at under the average value: Bisq / Average price. It may be worth adding this to the main article. Dr-Bracket (talk) 20:36, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Sorry, strongly disagree with that idea. We can go on all day about fungibility e.g. whether currency notes are really fungible when they have serial numbers, for example. For all intents and purposes, fungibility in the article is about intention of use. The topic isn't about whether Bitcoin is fungible or not, and that discussion will only serve to distract from the topic. --Btcgeek (talk) 06:04, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes, these points are valid and yes they are immaterial to the intent of this article. However, I strongly promote literal accuracy and so I'll make a brief update here. Full Decent (talk) 00:36, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• This change ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Non-fungible_token&oldid=prev&diff=912851625 was reverted by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:David_Gerard. I disagree with this reversion. But none of us are citing primary sources and I will not debate this further. Here is one primary source if anybody is interested: https://fulldecent.blogspot.com/2018/06/nontechnical-what-is-erc-721.html

Does anybody have references for NFT on EOS and other platforms? Please no draft interfaces. Draft standards have no place on Wikipedia. Full Decent (talk) 00:39, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]