User talk:ChocolateRabbit

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

This page has archives. Sections older than 1 days may be automatically archived by when more than 1 section is present.

I monitor my talk page regularly and will reply to your messages when I have time
If you leave messages for me here I will reply here
Please sign your message(s) so I know who you are
If you have left me a message on your talk page feel free to add the {{Talkback}} template below
Please only leave polite messages
Any vandalism will be reverted
If you would like to leave me a message please click here
Once a discussion has been closed it may be archived by either me or Lowercase sigmabot III

Your AIV report

I would like an explanation for this report, please. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:42, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:20, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

ChocolateRabbit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not been disruptively editing, also I believe this block to be inappropriate as I haven't even been given any warnings -- 🐇 ChocolateRabbit 23:21, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have not been disruptively editing, also I believe this block to be inappropriate as I haven't even been given any warnings -- 🐇 <b style="font-family:arial">[[User:ChocolateRabbit|<b style="color:brown">Chocolate</b>]]</b><b style="font-family:arial">[[User talk:ChocolateRabbit|<b style="color:green">Rabbit</b>]]</b>  23:21, 31 January 2018 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have not been disruptively editing, also I believe this block to be inappropriate as I haven't even been given any warnings -- 🐇 <b style="font-family:arial">[[User:ChocolateRabbit|<b style="color:brown">Chocolate</b>]]</b><b style="font-family:arial">[[User talk:ChocolateRabbit|<b style="color:green">Rabbit</b>]]</b>  23:21, 31 January 2018 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have not been disruptively editing, also I believe this block to be inappropriate as I haven't even been given any warnings -- 🐇 <b style="font-family:arial">[[User:ChocolateRabbit|<b style="color:brown">Chocolate</b>]]</b><b style="font-family:arial">[[User talk:ChocolateRabbit|<b style="color:green">Rabbit</b>]]</b>  23:21, 31 January 2018 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Instead of responding to my two requests for an explanation, you make the same report? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:22, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And you've been warned about making frivolous reports before. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:24, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NeilN, would you be open to unblocking this user if they agree to 0RR on football related topics? Their constant reversion of others and ownership of football topics seems to be the root cause. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:27, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@TonyBallioni: Perhaps, but I need an answer about the warnings and reports for Ethan111. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:30, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@NeilN: I reported Ethan111 because of vandalism and disruptive editing. I said that at the AIV page. -- 🐇 ChocolateRabbit 23:31, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain how this is vandalism. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@NeilN: He added unsourced content. -- 🐇 ChocolateRabbit 23:37, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@TonyBallioni: I'm tempted to make this block an indefinite one for competence issues. The material is clearly mentioned in the body. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:39, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How can you block me anyway, when I haven't recieved any prior warnings? You surely cannot do that without giving sufficient warnings -- 🐇 ChocolateRabbit 23:41, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]