User talk:Bonadea

Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.

This is Bonadea's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives

Archive 1 (Dec 2006 - Jun 2007) Archive 2 (Jun-Jul 2007 - Dec 2007) Archive 3 (Jan 2008 - Jul 2008) Archive 4 (Jul 2008 - Nov 2008) Archive 5 (Nov 2008 - Feb 2009) Archive 6 (Mar 2009 - Nov 2009) Archive 7 (Dec 2009 - Jul 2010) Archive 8 (Jul 2010 - Sep 2010) Archive 9 (Oct 2010 - April 2011) Archive 10 (May 2011 - Nov 2011) Archive 11 (Dec 2011 - May 2012) Archive 12 (Jun 2012 - Dec 2012) Archive 13 (Jan 2013 - Jun 2013) Archive 14 (Jul 2013 - April 2014) Archive 15 (May 2014 - Oct 2014) Archive 16 (Nov 2014 - 15 Nov 2015) Archive 17 (21 Nov 2015 - Mar 2016) Archive 18 (18 Mar 2016 - Dec 2016)

Thank you for removing that external link from the article funny animal. I actually checked to see where it led. The website it led to has nothing to with the funny animal genre. It is a website where you can post pictures or real-life animals that you find funny. Dimadick (talk) 19:54, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ola Bonadea, I am Thiago, I believe that a mistake was made yes. Ayla is a great singer who is becoming very recognized in Brazil. And like (Ayla (producer), German trance producer and DJ); I believe her name can not be left out. The site of the singer www.aylaoficial.com.br is in maintenance and soon will be in the air again. I kindly wanted you to add the singer again. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by AylaCantora (talk • contribs) 20:57, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Responding on the user's talk page --bonadea contributions talk 21:35, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, The potential Amitbhb12 sock is back again, recreated Akshay Bardapurkar again. Still waiting on SPI confirmation. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Thanks for the heads-up - the article was already gone by the time I saw this, but it's good to have many eyes on this company and their employees' actions. --bonadea contributions talk 15:46, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I Have Created Many Times My Userpages But Those Have Been Deleted.Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mehata Aditya (talk • contribs) 15:32, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For the reasons that have been posted to your user talk page by me and other editors. (And no, your user page has not yet been deleted. Several Wikipedia articles and other pages that you have created about yourself have been deleted, and your user page is now tagged for deletion because it looks like you want to use Wikipedia as a free webhost, which it isn't.) Please do not create any more pages about yourself, and please read the information that's been added to your user talk page about what you may and may not have on your userpage. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 15:41, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please Send Me A Form Of Userpage Where I Can Mention Thing According To Form Instruction.-Mehata Aditya (talk) 02:39, 15 January 2017 (UTC) @Bonadea:[reply]

@Mehata Aditya: When you are posting to somebody else's user talk page, you don't need to ping them because they will always be notified anyway. Please stop focusing on your user page for now - it looks like an administrator has actually protected your user page from being recreated. I'm pleased to see that you are working on other article pages, and recommend that you use the Wikipedia tea house (where there's almost always somebody around to respond quickly) if you want to ask questions about editing Wikipedia. --bonadea contributions talk 10:59, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, given your interest in mobile, did you check this discussion out? Thanks! --Melamrawy (WMF) (talk) 22:11, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I don't use an Android phone though so can't add anything to that discussion. --bonadea contributions talk 17:58, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brother what is ur problem Rathan Meshiek (talk) 17:48, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Rathan Meshiek: Thank you for discussing rather than restoring the unsourced information. I'm not sure what is unclear, though? There are several different notices on your user talk page letting you know that you can't add information without a reliable source to an article about a living person, and there's a notice on Hebah Patel (which you must have seen since you removed it) asking all editors to not add a birth date or year without a reliable source. Thanks. --bonadea contributions talk 17:50, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I spoke too soon, I see that you've yet again removed the edit notice and added an unsourced birth date. Oh well. --bonadea contributions talk 17:52, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

...Yeah, I'm only leaving this template because the reporter failed to do so. I've already closed it and said that no action will be taken :-). Cheers - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:38, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, Oshwah :-) It looks like a sock of User:Badman200772 (that's what I get for assuming good faith! ;p ) --bonadea contributions talk 06:44, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HA! I just noticed that a few seconds ago. Account is blocked as a sock puppet. Sorry for wasting your time with this. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:47, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NP, you are always welcome on my talk page :-) --bonadea contributions talk 06:56, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the instruction. I understand completely now. What do you suggest be provided to satisfy the templates? I am very familiar with this gentleman, and know that these references and statements are valid, but I can't find additional articles, posts or resources online.

MLR1990 (talk) 15:44, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I missed this due to all the sockpuppetry on this page. As the page is now semi protected I'll respond on your talk page. --bonadea contributions talk 19:08, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You sure about that revert? Seems like the IP is thanking him (the obvious harassment was removed by someone else before you). Perhaps you know something I don't, so I won't revert, but please take a look to confirm that's what you meant to do. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:44, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) (including my own talk page). Too much of a coincidence that this IP from India just pops out of nowhere with such an ambivalent note. Favonian (talk) 18:46, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Floquenbeam: Here's the thing: the IP (from one of the more common ranges used by Nsmutte) copied a post of mine on BethNaught's user talk page, here, and that's classic Nsmutte trolling. But that's not necessarily obvious to other people, so I should have said it - sorry about that. --bonadea contributions talk 18:53, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that explains the suddenly improved English grammar. ;) Favonian (talk) 18:57, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, don't apologize to me; I thought maybe there was more to it than what I knew, hence the question. Thanks, --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:01, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this guy even still trolling the project? Most spammers keep on spammin' and try to keep out of sight, but you never (to my knowledge) see them waging this kind of sustained harassment/disruption campaign. GAB^gab 23:51, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I wonder about that, too. The guy is (or claims to be) a medical doctor - the idea of a professional healer who takes pleasure in harassing and attempting to hurt other people is not exactly reassuring. Unless, of course, we believe that he's created 500+ sockpuppets to spam Wikipedia over the course of several years, in order to promote somebody else!

Oh, and this is possibly my least accurate prediction about anything, ever. :-P --bonadea contributions talk 16:46, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bonadea! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a new WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time. Me-123567-Me (talk) 18:57, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you noticed, but that was copied from here. And since there's no personal identifying information that I can find on ]https://www.facebook.com/the.national.identity.message/ this Facebook] page, I think I can link to it without being accused of outing. Some weird stuff there! Doug Weller talk 11:33, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. No, I had not noticed - good catch. It takes all sorts of peculiar beliefs to make a world, I guess. --bonadea contributions talk 12:01, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for that. (Jai Rajput (talk) 08:55, 2 February 2017 (UTC))[reply]

I'm pinging you in light of your role in fixing the recent hijacking of Ullaste to Broccoli pizza and pasta. I thought you'd like to know that Broccoli Pizza and Pasta Ltd was created just one day before. (I'm not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 23:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted an edit that posted a case to the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. Had that edit been made by a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user? If so, thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:03, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon: Yes, a sock of long-term abuser Nsmutte. The sock has been blocked. Cheers, --bonadea contributions talk 20:08, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: asanas, as discussed on my talk. It's up. Take care! O Fortuna!^{...Imperatrix mundi.} 16:38, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quote: Do not use this tag unless there are significant or substantial problems with the article's neutrality as a result of the contributor's involvement. Like the other {{POV}} tags, this tag is not meant to be a badge of shame or to "warn the reader" about the identities of the editors. Lyrda (talk) 16:02, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, quite. However, that has nothing to do with the use of that particular template on the article in question. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 16:03, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How so? May I also ask how you came to the discussion as I have a feeling that someone inappropriately called for backup. Lyrda (talk) 16:14, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfD discussions are logged and listed in various places, and any discussion that has a lot of activity is going to draw more attention, that's simply in the nature of things. I was not asked by anybody to participate in the discussion. There is no hint of "badge of shame" in the use of the COI template; like any other maintenance template it is a way to improve an article by flagging it for the attention of uninvolved editors. --bonadea contributions talk 16:25, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The template documentation says otherwise, as quoted above. Per Wikipedia:Help_desk#COI-tag_abuse, would you please remove the template? Note that it should not be used at all when the neutrality of the article is not questioned. Lyrda (talk) 16:36, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It has been removed by another uninvolved editor. --bonadea contributions talk 16:48, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.dreamviews.com/religion-spirituality/159562-atheism-nonsense-atheists-irrational-their-claims.html

• Atheism is nonsense and atheists are irrational in their claims — Preceding unsigned comment added by Callofworld (talk • contribs) 13:58, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Callofworld: You can add the link to your user talk page. You just can't copy and paste the text from that website because it is a copyright violation. (The link could not be used as a reference in a Wikipedia article, because it is a forum post, but that doesn't matter on your user talk page.) --bonadea contributions talk 14:01, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can't remember the master who keeps going after you. User:Banedua just copied your !vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Li word for word. I've reported the name as a disruptive impersonation name. Seems to be part of a campaign to make it look like you are socking. User:106.76.53.112 is part of it and User:Emoletelavadu is getting in on on it. Emol is just possibly good faith, but I doubt it. Meters (talk) 05:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh... Nsmutte. And no AGF left for EmolMeters (talk) 05:32, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Thanks for cleaning up! --bonadea contributions talk 05:41, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The inclusionists have now opened an ANI in the attempt to intimadate me out of contributing deletion nominations.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:32, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick heads up that this editor created an article called Remorse esports which was speedily deleted back in February. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:55, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: Well, there you go - I'm not surprised to see that. Seems like a young guy who creates articles about what he would like things to be like, rather than what they are. If it were only that easy to fix reality...! Cheers, --bonadea contributions talk 13:59, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There's another interesting tidbit... I just posted this message on an admin's talk page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:09, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I am not affiliated with any employer that would undermine my impartiality when it comes to editing. Please note this fact. Everything has been well-sourced reliably to the maximum extent possible. Thank you so much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Supermann (talk • contribs) 09:50, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That was maybe not the best approach to take, Supermann. You have been posting on behalf of Bliss Media, so the conflict of interest was already shown quite clearly, and as you knew when you posted this (because the info was there on your user talk page) a conflict of interest is not limited to being a salaried employee. Disclosing your COI would have been a simple thing, but trying to pretend it does not exist... well, I see you've already been blocked for it. --bonadea contributions talk 13:17, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, trust that you remember our conversation over dummy accounts from here.
Was hoping if you could help with a very similar scenario. For reason listed below, article Elliott Marc Jones seems to be influenced by sockpuppets of Samsonite24 (user)
When a proposed deletion and later, a CSD was issued, MANY new users started removing and contesting deletion.
Now, I'm not a 100% sure if and how I'm supposed to report this to WP:CHECK.
The following usernames seem suspicious (you may refer the users from both the article & talk pages -

1. Chris hastings au
2. Guanjosegonzales
3. Santaslisthelper1991
4. Maxmoefoewiki

Regret the intrusion though.
TopCipher (talk) 12:17, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
cc: @GSS-1987:

@Topcipher: I think you are absolutely right about this, and you should open a sockpuppet investigation about it. Do you use Twinkle? That makes it rather easy to start a SPI, but it's not that difficult to do manually via Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations. Drop me a line if you run into any difficulties. Also note that sometimes it takes a while before somebody gets to an SPI, and when the article is vandalised like this one, with single-purpose accounts arriving in droves to remove the sd tag, you can also request page protection at WP:RPP. Cheers, --bonadea contributions talk 13:25, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Topcipher: Yes they are please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mrmeatboy123. GSS (talk|c|em) 13:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, GSS-1987! --bonadea contributions talk 13:38, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea: @GSS-1987: Thank you very much! For now, let me shadow the movements of it's usage (check user's) as I think it would allow me to first understand the processes better (trust that these acquisitions require intense proof and further actions/follow-up) and I better get a good hold of them before having myself involved. Thanks, again!
TopCipher (talk) 14:04, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When tagging AfDs for speedy deletion, make sure to place the template inside <noinclude>...</noinclude> tags, so the template does not transclude to the log. The tagging resulted in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages having nine entries, even though only one was tagged. Just wanted to let you know. —MRD2014 📞 What I've done 15:13, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, MRD2014 - I will do that in future. --bonadea contributions talk 15:14, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That you didn't jump at the chance of buying bath salts online ;) — O Fortuna! ^{Imperatrix mundi.} 12:03, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some of us can't see a good thing if it jumps up and hits us in the eye, eh? (ow, bath salts in the eye. Not a pleasant thought.) ;-) --bonadea contributions talk 12:07, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

They'd be no use to me. I'd have to have a bath first :) An even more painful image! Take care, — O Fortuna! ^{Imperatrix mundi.} 12:30, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: Btw, it always pleases me when I get to put a "Yo, Fortuna" template on a tp post. Makes me smile like the moon (see what I did there?) Anyway, sorry, I'm sure you have heard that one too many times by now :-) --bonadea contributions talk 21:28, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi bonadea! I recently left you a comment on your response to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorenzo Doryon I kindly ask that you read my comment and reconsider your response. I noticed you were from Sweden, very cool!! I hope to be able to visit one day. I am also studying philosophy in school interestingly enough. I was wondering how you added the female badge to your page? Is that something I can just copy the source from on your page and post it to mine, or is there a better way? Thank you! MusicSource17 (talk) 07:15, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@MusicSource17: Hi, I've replied to your comment in the AfD. It can be very discouraging to have an article you've created deleted, but it's not a reflection on you, simply a matter of the person not (yet?) being notable enough to meet Wikipedia's peculiar notabilty criteria. As for the user box (that's what those "badges" are called), you can copy the code from User:Bonadea/UBX - they are free to use :-) There's a lot of different user boxes created by different people, which you can find through this page. Cheers, --bonadea contributions talk 07:30, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi bonadea, Thank you for informing me about the policy regarding comment formatting. I have added some additional things to the AfD that I would love to have your opinion on. I truly believe that the subject of my article meets the notability criteria and I am enjoying championing for this article. I have spent a lot of time on this article and would love to see it succeed. Hopefully with my last comment I was able to demonstrate further why I believe this subject meets the criteria. If you have any suggestions for me on how I can improve this article, I would love to hear them!! That is very generous of you to make those badges available. It really helps because sometimes I can get a bit confused on which pronouns to use when talking to certain users :) I will definitely be borrowing one of those when I have a chance to build out my user page. MusicSource17 (talk) 08:09, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bonadea, you just added a speedy deletion tag to the Teaching Trouble short film article. Can you please completely confirm why you did this.Superpilot123456 (talk) 09:37, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]