Talk:India
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the India article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
|
India is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 3, 2004. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
Template:Outline of knowledge coverage
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the India article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Images
Hi,
The article is well written and offcourse it is a featured one. But I think it lags behind in case of some more good images. So, I request someone( especially regentspark) to add more images. Apart from that, a mini article of science and technology section makes it more delightful — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.254.98.190 (talk) 18:21, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606112149/http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/17/52/39452196.pdf to http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/17/52/39452196.pdf
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5mqfQ6Tl4 to http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/org6_e.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140407092737/http://mruc.net/irs2012q1-topline-findings.pdf to http://mruc.net/irs2012q1-topline-findings.pdf
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110417031235/http://www.india.gov.in:80/ to http://india.gov.in/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:23, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Links work, but #2 and 4 lead to index pages. Don't know how useful they are. Dhtwiki (talk) 16:06, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 12 August 2016
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The Vedas may have not been composed in the Punjab region I think more needs to be done to stop this article being hijacked my racists and Aryanists. The identity of the origin of the Vedas cannot be pinpointed to Pubjab; Pubjab is one on many regions that the Vedas may have been composed in. The corresponding article on the Vedas (and links from the Vedas) gives further depth to why this is so.
I think the article should change the "Punjab" to "the Gangtic Plain", and refrain from anything overtly "Aryan" by restraining to the usage of words such as "North India" or just "India".
As a South Indian brought up with foreign education, I consider this to still be controversial. And I don't think saying "the majority of scholars" is a fair point because a lot of racist material has been written by scholars in the past.
'"the Punjab region and" should be deleted
Megawave111 (talk) 16:01, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not done The article doesn't say that the vedas were composed in the punjab region. --regentspark (comment) 16:12, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- The article implies that the Vedas have origins in the Pubjab. I think this should be deleted for the reasons stated above. Megawave111 (talk) 16:17, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is written based on what the reliable sources say. Whether any of us agree with the sources or not makes no difference. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:47, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Consider having a further discussion to achieve a consensus before submitting a request. Not done for now — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 20:42, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Sexual violence
The user RegentsPark undid an edit in the society section concerning child sexual abuse stating that it lacked consensus. This is the sentence about statistics from a government report, "India has the largest number of sexually abused children, with 53% being subjected to sexual abuse,[1] and it is argued to be driven by a higher reluctance to expose relatives, who are often the abusers.[2]". Also, the user Fowler&fowler I think previously brought up in the talk page a while back stating notable issues including Rape in India, Acid throwing, Sex selection among others were missing. Of course, I can modify this to what everybody can agree on. JustBeCool (talk) 05:28, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Why an MP wants India to talk about child sex abuse". bbcnews.com. 5 December 2015. Retrieved 22 December 2015.
- ^ "Abuse of Indian children 'common'". bbcnews.com. 9 April 2007. Retrieved 1 August 2018.
- Wikipedia featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Wikipedia articles that use Indian English
- FA-Class India articles
- Top-importance India articles
- FA-Class India articles of Top-importance
- India portal selected articles
- WikiProject India articles
- FA-Class South Asia articles
- Top-importance South Asia articles
- South Asia articles
- FA-Class Asia articles
- Top-importance Asia articles
- WikiProject Asia articles
- WikiProject templates with unknown parameters
- FA-Class country articles
- WikiProject Countries articles
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press