Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Olson (photographer)
- Jake Olson (photographer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Apparent autobiographical advertisement page created and edited by subject (new user, only contributions are creating and editing this article). Appears to not be notable; references consist mainly of being listed in several "socially influential photographers" lists, blogs and a self-published biography.
Subject of article appears to not have received significant coverage in reliable sources independent of subject; the article appears to have been created as a promotional tool by the subject. Article is supported mainly by self-published sources (not recommended per BLP guidelines).
Subject appears to not be notable, per WP:BIO. atomicthumbs‽ (talk) 02:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 03:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 03:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 03:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete; I can’t find any non-promotional source on the subject. Okhjon (talk) 09:48, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Commercial artist without significant independent coverage. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:57, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Self-promotional advertisement for non-notable photographer (who seems like a narcissist). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.113.20.135 (talk) 14:25, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Delete Using wikipedia as self-promotion, also a douche.
Subject of article is a narcissistic, colossal douchebag.
Delete him
-I second that motion! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.84.236.24 (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Subject of article is a waste of space, uses wikipedia to shame others. Delete.[1]15.195.185.84 (talk) 15:41, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
This person has not made any notable contributions above and beyond the THOUSANDS of other photographers floating around. Please consider deleting this entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.90.11.237 (talk) 15:44, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
this guy is a huge chode. Delete- not a good artist and not a good person.
