Talk:All-China Women's Federation
All-China Women's Federation is currently a Politics and government good article nominee. Nominated by Shelby McPherson (talk) at 16:21, 2 April 2014 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer.
|
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Spring 2014. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Rice University/History of Chinese Women Through Time (Spring 2014)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
Plan to revise article
The existing article is currently rated as a mid-importance article, but is only a stub class article, which means there are several aspects that can be improved.The article does not fully address the history of the federation, discuss the complex relationship between the federation and the Chinese government, examine the ideology and structure of the group, or address the complex challenges facing the federation currently, such as its NGO status. These changes will address the content issues within the article, and I also plan on tackling some of the editorial issues within the article. The article suffers from a lack of academic sources. More sources would address the content issues, and relying on academic sources will make sure the changes are accurate. Some journals I plan on consulting include the International Feminist Journal of Politics, Communist and Post Communist Studies, and World Development. I plan on expanding the introduction, adding sections covering the aspects of the federation I discussed above, and increasing the number of relevant links in the See Also section. This contribution is part of a class for Rice University, so please feel free to give advice or suggestions concerning this article. Shelby McPherson (talk) 03:01, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- It may also be a good idea to look into adding a "criticism" section. I was just browsing around for info on the ACWF when I found this remarkable op-ed: "China’s ‘Leftover’ Women". It's not an academic source, but it's written by a doctoral student and its claims certainly seem to provide a potential area of investigation. TI. Gracchus (talk) 09:13, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees on review
- Stub-Class China-related articles
- Mid-importance China-related articles
- Stub-Class China-related articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- Stub-Class Human rights articles
- Low-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles
- Unassessed organization articles
- Unknown-importance organization articles
- WikiProject Organizations articles
- Stub-Class Feminism articles
- Mid-importance Feminism articles
- WikiProject Feminism articles
- Stub-Class Women's History articles
- Mid-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles