User talk:Everyme

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia. (info: block log • contributions • deleted contributions • page moves • current autoblocks)

{{adminhelp}}

Please delete all subpages of this account, as well as all subpages and the main userpage of my prior account, User:Dorftrottel (preferably then restore it with a redirect to this talk page). Everyme 07:28, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Also, could someone semiprotect this account's main user page to prevent cowardly anonymous and utterly untrue accusations like this? Everyme 07:36, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hilarious, Islander. You undo my evil, uncivil language (like it matters to anyone) but you leave the cowardly, bad-faithed and wrong accusations against me in place. Makes me feel real good about your judgement in indefblocking me. Sorta. Everyme 09:26, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am handling these requests. Thank you for your message. Stifle (talk) 18:34, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a bunch. Everyme 20:46, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please, anyone, undo this slander and semiprotect the main userpage of this account. I've never abusively sockpuppeted as in pretending to be someone else while editing in the same area or some such. I've never had more than one account active at a time. Even with my IP edits, I've made it clear (whenever I remembered to) that it's me. My only error was being too straightforward which earned me vengeful persecution by people like this. I don't deserve to be slandered with wrongful accusations like that. I know already that admin Islander (who incidentally is the one who indefblocked me) disagrees on that, seeing as he noticed but decided against reverting that IP's edit. If there's still someone out there with so much as a shred of dignity in their bones (i.e. not e.g. Islander), please undo that edit and semiprotect this account's main userpage. Everyme 09:54, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Oh, and if you want to be extra nice, you could remove me from Wikipedia:WikiProject James Bond#Participants. Everyme 10:03, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  You don't seem to be on it. Stifle (talk) 18:35, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  All your user subpages have been deleted. I haven't presumed to delete your talk subpages but will check back here to see if you request it. Stifle (talk) 18:43, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm listed as User:AldeBaer at the 007 project. Yes, please delete the talk subpages as well. Thanks again. Everyme 20:46, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I did not agree nor disagree with anything with regards to your requests above - I would in all probability have fulfilled them, but unfortunately after reverting your uncivil comment, I got distracted by work. I appologise for not coming back to deal with them. _TalkIslander 09:04, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please respect my wish for you not to comment here ever again. You may of course censor anything I might have to say and enable vicious personal attacks against me like you already did, but please at least don't comment here. Fact is, you read my comment and you decided that censoring my comment was far more urgent than undoing the cowardly IP vandalism accusing me of something I have never done. Unfortunately, the IP is not familiar and I cannot recommend a particular checkuser, but the fact remains that you, distracted or not, did decide my accurate (if "uncivil") uncivil (if "accurate") comment needed correction much more than personal attacks against me. Case closed. Everyme 09:39, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but you're indefinitely blocked, so I cannot respect that wish. Like I said, I paid no attention to your request - I had no idea what it was about, whether it was valid or not, reasonable or not etc., so I passed no judgement whatsoever. All I saw was your innapropriate remark. _TalkIslander 12:29, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What, you indefblocked me and therefore you feel you have to anger me further? You cannot (please explain that "cannot", I fail to understand the logic there) respect my wish for you to at least leave me alone from now on and let others handle any potentially forthcoming issues? Your indefblocking me makes it necessary for you to keep beating me over the head? It is unavoidable that you keep baiting me with inane comments and absent logic like that? And if and when I react uncivilly, let me guess... that gives you the excuse you're looking for to fully protect this page and disable email, right? Good thing you're not just an unfriendly jackass. Everyme 14:04, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(ec) 'Cannot' was perhaps the wrong word - 'will not' would have been better. I have as much right as anyone to post on this page, and I will do so. As for an excuse, it wouldn't be an excuse, as that would imply that I am looking for an excuse, which I'm really not - it would be a reason. I don't know why you think I have a vendetta against you - I really don't. I can't specifically remember ever interacting with you in any way before this, which surely makes me fairly a fairly neutral and uninvolved admin. Now, if you wish to request to be unblocked, please do so. If not, please stop using this talk page - you have no reason to do so anymore. _TalkIslander 14:20, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I was just about to add that: With "cannot", you really mean "Fuck you, asshole, I do because I can". Which is of course fine, but intellectual dishonesty disgusts me. And it continues. Please pay at least some attention to what I am writing. Did I say you "are not allowed to" post here? No. No, I didn't. I said "Please respect my wish." I'm of course aware that you are allowed to post here. That's why I asked you please not to. And therefore your saying you won't respect my wish equals you telling me to go fuck myself. As to requesting unblock, I have no fucking idea who or what gave you the idea that I intend to request unblock. No, I won't for the time being. And my reasoning for that, although it's none of your business, is that I am not an idiot and I know that another completely uninvolved admin will certainly decline my request. How can I hope for sanity to prevail when you are not even respecting my request not to comment here? Why are you playing me for a sucker like that? Is there nothing better than taking a dump on my head? And what do you care whether or not I communicate with others on this talk page? What's it to you? Feel free to adjust my comments to your liking, but how on God's green earth is it against policy for me to still use this talk page to communicate with other people who are interested in what happened? And how is it illegitimate for me to use this fucking talk page to request this account's subpages to be deleted and a personal attack to be reverted? Everyme 14:29, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've been gone. WTF? Keeper ǀ 76 03:06, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Everyme indefed for persistent and admitted block evasion. Grsz¹¹ 03:17, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Persistent" block evasion to make a few minor mainspace edits in areas utterly unrelated to my block and not in themselves problematic at all, and I committed the capital crime of contacting Privatemusings and Casliber on their talk pages one time each. Then I made the even worse mistake of asking (via IP) at AN if such edits are really a reason to extend my block (as it had been done several times, see my block log). During that discussion, MBisanz enacted a (still effective) rangeblock. It's ridiculous, but at the same time it's an accurate testimony about the state of affairs on Wikipedia. Yes, during the whole ordeal I "admitted" to evading my block. One might also say I was being very straightforward at every turn, but that kind of perspective is not for everyone. Not coincidentally, Grsz11 should be the one admonished, but for his uninformed actions at Talk:Barack Obama he didn't receive so much as a warning. The letter of so-called "Civility" trumps everything now. And IAR is dead (namely, ignoring a stupid and exaggerated block by Matthew Bisanz to do some harmless minor formatting and contact two old acquaintances, then ask at AN if it's really necessary to extend my block for that). Grsz11, you are not welcome to edit this talk page, and you know that, and you should please respect my wish. Keeper, you are maybe the foremost example of someone I'd like to stay in contact with, but since you cannot have email, I guess this is about it. I may request an unblock somewhere down the road, but with people like long-time SP abuser Le Grand Roi, of all, accusing me of sockpuppetry out of the blue, I don't feel it would be useful as of right now. Maybe next year. Until then, as soon as the rangeblock expires, I may or may not return to ignoring the ineptitude and vengefulness of some people and probably make the occasional minor mainspace formatting edit (Grsz11, get ready to cry bloody murder when I do such a preposterous thing which, oh, you should be doing instead of POV pushing and trolling). Keeper, please make sure to look in this page's history to catch anything glorious admins like Islander may censor from your view. Also see the cangaroo court (plus a very few decent voices that go totally unresponded) here. Everyme 09:37, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I was only summarazing AN because Keeper asked. No need to get pissy. Grsz¹¹ 14:06, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Get my email? (ping...!) Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:30, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Got it and am writing a reply. Everyme 10:49, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]