Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention
Appearance
UAA navigation: |
Usernames for administrator attention |
---|
This page is intended for reports of usernames that are blatant and serious violations of the username policy requiring an immediate block. Reports will be assessed in accordance with the username policy, the UAA instructions, and the following bullet points. Please ensure you are familiar with the assessment criteria before making a report.
|
Note: Patrollers may wish to monitor usernames flagged by filters 54, 148 and 149; private filters 102, 354, 499, 579; and this recent changes filter tag.
This page was last updated at 18:09 on 15 November 2024 (UTC).
if it is out of date.
- Professor constipation pants (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "constipat" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:40, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
- PathwaysMelbourne (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See the userpage. Johnj1995 (talk) 03:45, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Being discussed with the user. They reached out for help, so I'm trying it that way first. 331dot (talk) 06:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Senate Committee on Indian Affairs - Hannah (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Username claiming to a member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Indian Affairs. Likely either misleading, or a WP:ROLE account under WP:SOCK if true. R0paire-wiki (talk) 17:02, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not a violation of the username policy. This type of name is specifically called out in the username policy as acceptable. See fourth bullet point under WP:ISU. It's worth keeping an eye on their edits for possible paid editing or conflict of interest editing, but the username itself is fine. --Hammersoft (talk) 18:02, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. It would only be a role account if it said something like "staffer" instead of "Hannah" which indicates a specific person. Senate committees do have staffers as well as members. Cullen328 (talk) 18:04, 25 September 2024 (UTC)