User talk:Robert Merkel

User talk:Robert Merkel/ancient User talk:Robert Merkel/archive 1 User talk:Robert Merkel/archive 2 User talk:Robert Merkel/archive 3 User talk:Robert Merkel/archive 4

Hello Robert, I would like to add public interest pertinent published information to Muhammad ALi Wikipedia page about his Beatles reunion plans. Enoska13 (talk) 09:01, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robert, Thank you for your expansion of the Keating! article, especially the detailed song summary. You attention to detail is brilliant. I have made a couple of small alterations: 1- describing "It's Time" as Blue-eyed soul rather than bossa nova, and 2- including a reference to Barry White in the "I Wanna Do You Slowly" summary. I hope you don't mind. Feel free to revert if you disagree. Altissima 02:14, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. I'm not sure about exactly how you'd classify "It's time", maybe I'll have to ask a musician friend. I would definitely agree with the Barry White reference with "I wanna...". Thanks for giving the article further attention--Robert Merkel 04:29, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Try imagining Spandau Ballet or Culture Club singing "It's Time" ...what do you think? Altissima 05:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This Image which you claim to have created your self appears to be a copyright violation. If you can prove that you did infact create the image and the image is under your copyright then the image can remain on wikipedia. If not the image may be deleted.--Lucy-marie 15:04, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I take your point on board and admit that I may be wrong. In my defence however I typed in "Hockey pitch" in to google and the first image to appear was an identical image on the hockey factory website. On their so that is the reason I flagged it. no malice was intended. all I simply did was say look could put this straight by proving you created the image. Instead I got another edit jumping all over it making a big deal. All I wanted was a couple of lines saying look either I'm sorry ok I did take it from them or This is how it was created by my self and they haven't properly attributed this as the source. I did not have any intention of slandering your name. I also highly doubt an employer would take wiki as a definitive reference of your character.

On an aside note why is the whole image in the imperial system and not at least metric and imperial. I understand that if you are from America primarily the imperial system is used, but America is one of only three countries in the world to do so and the only country who competitively plays hockey to do so. Could you please place the metric equivalent on the image as well?

Many thanks and I hope this is cleared up--Lucy-marie 21:31, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. As to your point about employers not using Wikipedia histories to judge character, unfortunately, what you do online is increasingly being scrutinized by employers. I think this is inappropriate, but it's happening.

As to my objection, it's not that you asked, it's that the way you went about it presumed a copyvio rather than querying first. But, in any case, I've said my piece on that.

As to adding metric, when I created the image, the distances were quoted in imperial (and are nice round numbers in imperial) in the official hockey rulebook. I think that's been changed. I'll fix the diagram when I get a chance. --Robert Merkel 01:35, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please take the time to go to Hugh Hefner's talkpage [1] and respond to the request for comment on what jerrygraf is trying to add that does not belong on Hugh Hefner's page, but belongs on PEI's, as well as the part I deleted is ment as a "controversial comment on the biography of a living person"Rogue Gremlin 04:24, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(move Rogue Gremlin 04:24, 27 September 2007 (UTC) edit from user page - wrong place for edit - to user talk page - right place for edit - step 2)[reply]
Made judgement that edit was in wrong place; make no judgement about the content of edit. --Shirt58 (talk) 11:24, 10 January 2008 (UTC) (ps: Hi, Rob!)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:All out of love excerpt.ogg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Κaiba 09:57, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Image:Aussie rules ground distances small.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Aussie rules ground distances small.png|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hennessey, Patrick (talk) 04:48, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved your old user page history from Robert Merkel to User:Robert Merkel/ancient, to correspond with User talk:Robert Merkel/ancient, since I could find no reason that it should be deleted. I like going through very old deleted contributions to find out if there's anything worth salvaging. Graham87 12:59, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

The image Netball court.svg is a candidate to be copied to the Wikimedia Commons. When you uploaded this image, you licensed it for use under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). On behalf of the Wikipedia and Commons communities, thank you. However, the GFDL requires that reproductions of the image (and any other GFDL-licenced works), must be accompanied by the full text of the GFDL. The GFDL is intended more for documentation and not images, so downstream re-users may be hindered by additional restrictions of the GFDL which may not work well on the use of one image.

Before I copy this image to the Commons, I wanted to ask whether you would be willing to multilicense your work under an additional license, such as a Creative Commons licence. Creative Commons licences, such as the Attribution Share-Alike license provide a similar copyleft permission to the GFDL, but without some of its requirements such as the distribution of the licence text. All you need to do, is place the additional license tag alongside your current license. Users can choose between which one they want to use the image under. There are many free licenses accepted on Wikipedia and Commons which can provide freedoms similar to the GFDL, but without some of its requirements.

You are under no obligation whatsoever to alter the license. Doing so merely cooperates with those members of the community who believe that multilicensing your work can ease the reuse of images outside of Wikipedia.

If you use a GFDL license tag which requires distribution of Wikipedia's general disclaimer (indicated by "Subject to disclamiers" in the template), it is also suggested that you switch it to one which does not apply them.

It is also strongly advised, to update to the 1.3 version of the GFDL.

Whether or not you choose to dual-license your work, thank you for your consideration.

Thanks! --Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:35, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Basketball_backboard_and_basket_large.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:05, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robert

I noticed that you changed the text on the Alpine NP page to say that the Falls Creek and Hotham resorts are within the park. I've altered this back to adjacent. Alpine NP is reserved under the National Parks Act and manged by Parks Victoria. The resorts are outside the park's legislated boundary and reserved under different legislation and managed by Boards of Management. Parks Vic is represented on the boards and works with the boards but the park and the resorts are independent entities.

Cheers Ian —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eanut (talk • contribs) 00:22, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:State Library of Victoria jul2004.jpg, which you've sourced to http://deggles.csoft.net/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 23:07, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:State Library of Victoria jul2004.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:46, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Castlemaine street scene.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:35, 3 January 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:35, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Nude celebrities on the Internet, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nude celebrities on the Internet (2nd nomination). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  – iridescent 16:42, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that a couple of images you uploaded back in 2004 (specifically, File:Castlemaine commercial building.jpg and File:Castlemaine post office.jpg) and which were later transferred to Commons have now been nominated for deletion there because their author is not explicitly stated. If, as seems likely, you created these photos yourself, could you please visit the deletion discussions for those images and say so (and change the tag on the images)? Thanks, and sorry for bothering you with this.

(Ps. If someone has already deleted those images by the time you see this message, let me know and I can restore them. Also, it seems File:Castlemaine street scene.jpg was deleted from Wikipedia earlier for the same reason; if it was also your own work, I can restore it as well.) —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 23:41, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can also have the images restored. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 00:07, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Robert Merkel! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 322 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Richard Karp - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Livinia Nixon - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Janet Holmes à Court - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:43, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HI. I found a duplicate of Pioneer Able picture you have submitted http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pioneer_able.png . The duplicate is here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pioneer1a.jpg . According to http://msl.jpl.nasa.gov/QuickLooks/pioneer0QL.html the Thor Able vehicle was used in Pioneers 0, 1, 2 so your picture should be probably renamed and the other duplicate should be removed. --85.132.159.231 (talk) 17:32, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rasta Thomas will turn 30 years old on July 18, 2011, and I would LOVE for him to be the featured article of the day on that day. I'm calling foryou your help to join in on taking this article to greatness, and giving Rasta a little love. I'm only asking you since you starting the ballet article :) --Esprit15d • talk • contribs 20:34, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at the meetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow! SteveBot (talk) 04:58, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, At last month's June meetup we discussed the idea of setting up a Training Course at a University of the Third Age (U3A) to be held in 2013 and named Becoming a Wikipedia editor. In order to get this course up and running we are calling for volunteers to help develop the idea, and either tutor part of the course, or provide one on one help to students in the class. All local Wikipedians are welcome to discuss this at our 11am meetup to be held this Sunday on 22 July. Please add your name to the attending list at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 23. Food and beverages are provided. Cuddy Wifter (talk) 05:00, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne Meetup Next: 6 January 2013 at La Trobe City Campus Previous: 25 November 2012 This box: view talk edit

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 06:49, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)

A tag has been placed on Medicare (Australia), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Revolution1221 (talk) 02:40, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The article, Ear has been selected within the scope of our project to become one of Today's Articles for Improvement. The article is currently in the TAFI Holding Area, where comments are welcome about ideas to improve it. After the article is moved from the holding area to the TAFI schedule, it will be collaborated on for one week. Everyone is invited to participate in the discussion and encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thank you, Braden 17:25, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply] (From the TAFI team)

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. Ottawahitech (talk) 15:59, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 23:26, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:31, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. –xeno^talk 04:48, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robert Merkel. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

After surviving AfDs, Doug Thorley and Magoo are still up, but both could use better sourcing. I'm wondering if you've got back issues of Hot Rod, Car Craft, National Dragster, & the like that would help. Ditto on Jake, Showboat, The Mantaray, Ed Donovan, Donovan hemi, Silhouette, and a few others I've created lately. (Have a look at my userpage under the "Open Vanity" 3&4.) Any help you can be would be very much appreciated. TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 23:56, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Robert Merkel,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 16:43, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Cooper's. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 1#Cooper's until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:16, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raj Reddy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raj Reddy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BrigadierG (talk) 04:17, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Topamax® and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#Topamax® until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BD2412 T 05:20, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Formula One

added a link pointing to Ground effect

Open-wheel car

added a link pointing to DTM

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Assembly language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kernel.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Security Agency in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Security Agency in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:07, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Energy in Victoria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AGL.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Energy in Western Australia, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 03:46, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robert Merkel. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2022 Australian energy shock, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robert Merkel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2022 Australian energy shock".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:49, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kangaroo Island, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Coral Taylor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harry Bates.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Sports Sedan Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trans Am.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited FIA Global Pathway from Karting to Formula One, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page World Endurance Championship.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

St Kilda Football Club has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]