User talk:Timur9008/Archive 9
Appearance
4licening edit
[edit]Thanks for the clean up on the 4liceing article since I made the Yugioh GX edit Kirbopher2004 (talk) 22:22, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- Kirbopher2004 No problem! Happy editing :)Timur9008 (talk) 10:53, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Flashpoint
[edit]Timur9008, thanks for your contributions, but are you sure that Flashpoint Productions warrants its own article? Sources #1, #3 and #4 are all non-independent (either primary sources or interviews from secondary sources), so WP:NCORP and WP:SIGCOV would be instantly failed. I shopped around the web for information when I expanded the relevant section on Bethesda Softworks and this is really all I could find. The topic is probably better off as a redirect to the section on Bethesda's article, but I'd like to hear your take on this. Regards, IceWelder [✉] 10:11, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- I was going to add another source [[1]] that they co-developed with Bad Dog, XCar: Experimental Racing but I take it it's not enough to warrant it's own article? If you are going to delete the article then go ahead, I may have jumped the gun here. @IceWelder Timur9008 (talk) 13:30, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Having developed a game is not necessarily and indication of notability (side note: the source makes no mention of "Bad Dog"), as significant coverage of the company itself is lacking. The bit that is on Business Examiner is not enough to have an entire article. If look at the article in its current state, it would be verifiable-complete with very little actual content. Compare this with MachineGames, which (albeit compact) is rich in information that regard mostly the company itself. You should consider merging bits that have not been mentioned to Bethesda's section and then redirect Flashpoint there. Regards, IceWelder [✉] 10:45, 8 July 2020 (UTC)