User talk:Georgejdorner

/User page: The brag wall

/User page: Dab notices
/User page: The Bugle
/Archive: Aces
/Archive: List of WWI aces
/Archive: Wiki editing
/Archive: General bumf

On 2 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Operation Maeng Da, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Operation Maeng Da translates as "Operation Pimp"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Maeng Da. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 5 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tchepone Operation, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the second column of the Tchepone Operation was Orange, Red, and Black? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tchepone Operation. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Donald Nichols (spy), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sergeant Donald Nichols correctly forecast that the Korean War would start within a certain three-day period? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Donald Nichols (spy). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Forward air control operations during the Korean War, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that despite using forward air control operations during the Korean War, the U.S. military could not agree on a common doctrine between 1946 and 1966? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Forward air control operations during the Korean War. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 12 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Operation Junction City Jr., which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during Operation Junction City Jr., members of Bataillon Commando 203 fled from a crowd of refugees they mistook for enemy troops? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Junction City Jr.. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 22 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Project Waterpump, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Project Waterpump. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Allen3 ^talk 00:07, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Campaign 139, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when General Vang Pao begged senior generals for reinforcements to stave off defeat in Campaign 139, they were busy with parade practice? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Campaign 139. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 25 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Operation Counterpunch, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that beginning on 26 September 1970, Vang Pao would throw three Counterpunches? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Counterpunch. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 26 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Project Copper, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Project Copper began and ended military cooperation between the Khmer Republic and the Kingdom of Laos? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Project Copper. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

		The WikiChevrons
		Thank you for your tireless contributions to the Military History project, especially in the neglected area of the Laotian Civil War. Your hard work is greatly appreciated! Zanhe (talk) 21:11, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Operation Desert Rat, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Desert Rat followed Silver Buckle? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Desert Rat. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 7 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Operation Phiboonpol, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Operation Phiboonpol caused vultures to become an aviation hazard? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Phiboonpol. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 10 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Chinese Road, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a Chinese aid project in Laos was defended by 400 anti-aircraft guns and 25,000 troops? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Chinese Road. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 14 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Operation Phoutah, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during Operation Phoutah, Groupement Mobile 33 carried their gut-shot colonel and 50 other wounded for 13 hours? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Phoutah. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Operation Xieng Dong, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that just before Operation Xieng Dong, the People's Army of Vietnam captured the King's farm? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Xieng Dong. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Operation Snake Eyes, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when the White House postponed Operation Snake Eyes again, Captain Sourisok quit the Laotian Civil War? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Snake Eyes. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 20 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Operation Bedrock (Laos), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Operation Bedrock was a successful rice denial mission? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Bedrock (Laos). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:07, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 22 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Operation Silver Buckle, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that two Silver Buckle companies attacked 50,000 enemy troops? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Silver Buckle. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Operation Sourisak Montry VIII, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that though Thailand was not at war with Communist China, it still fought Operation Sourisak Montry VIII in 1972? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Sourisak Montry VIII. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Operation Sayasila, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Royal Lao Government casualties outnumbered the People's Army of Vietnam defenders in Operation Sayasila? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Sayasila. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Campaign 74B, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during Campaign 74B in the Laotian Civil War, smog from swidden farming clogged the air? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Campaign 74B. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Campaign Z, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that uninjured reporters commandeered a medical evacuation helicopter during Campaign Z? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Campaign Z. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 16 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Operation Maharat, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during Operation Maharat, neutralists besieged neutralists? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Maharat. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Operation Phalat, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Operation Phalat was a preventative strike into Laos by Thai forces in 1971 to contain communist influence in the region? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Phalat. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 18 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Operation Strength, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during Operation Strength, a 15,000 lb (6.8 T) bomb (example of detonation pictured) served as a diversion to a diversion? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Strength. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Edmund Nathanael, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the Nazi era, World War I flying ace Edmund Nathanael was deleted from the list of Hohenzollern honorees? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Edmund Nathanael. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Operation Fa Ngum, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Fa Ngum. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 01:20, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Operation Maharat II, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during Operation Maharat II, a sonic boom scared the Pathet Lao into retreat? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Maharat II. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:42, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Operation Strength II, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that, when bad weather caused more than half of them to desert, the remaining off-and-on mutineers of Operation Strength II were disarmed and flown to a training base at Seno? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Strength II. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:27, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

		The Laos Barnstar of National Merit
		For your work creating articles on the Laotian Civil War. 3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 20:44, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Operation Sinsay, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the battalions imported from Military Region 3 during Operation Sinsay held their objective for three days before being returned? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Sinsay. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:33, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:56, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gatoclass (talk) 12:42, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 17:16, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mifter (talk) 00:01, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am having a few problems with an enthusiastic but at times very dogmatic editorial colleague on the Fokker Scourge article. In fact, things have reached a pass where some second opinions might be useful. The specific question he is hammering at the moment is that we shouldn't ever say "No. 1 Squadron RAF" (in spite of that being the usual way of putting it) but "1 Squadron" (on the grounds that the "No." is redundant). I wouldn't object to an occasional omission of the "No.", if only for elegant variation, but he has been going right through the article wiping every instance and claiming that "Wikipedia is not a source" (which is true enough, but nothing to do with the case). The gentleman concerned has been making dozens of other (mostly very pettifogging) changes to the article - a few have been genuine improvements, and most at least acceptable alternatives but some of have made clear text obscure, even meaningless. I have let everything he has done that is at all acceptable stand, but the really bad ones I've had to change - usually with a new version rather than a provocative revert.

I was wondering, if you have a moment, if you'd like to have a little look at the Fokker Scourge talk page (go straight to the bottom if you like) and tell me, either here, on my talk page, or even on the talk page of the article if you want to actually buy into the discussion, if I'm being totally unreasonable and should just give up. This is (for a WWI aviation article) quite a high traffic one - and I'd like to leave it in reasonable shape. At least readable, and plain in meaning (two things I value far above brevity for its own sake). --Soundofmusicals (talk) 01:22, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gatoclass (talk) 00:17, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rudolf Berthold you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rudolf Berthold for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:20, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

hi, I made some edits to the references etc. of your WP:GAN article Jagdgeschwader II. If you have any questions, let me know. later Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 08:41, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jagdgeschwader II you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 08:21, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jagdgeschwader III you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 08:22, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jagdgeschwader III you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jagdgeschwader III for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 16:02, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jagdgeschwader II you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jagdgeschwader II for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Iazyges -- Iazyges (talk) 16:21, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For your help last month in reviewing the good article nomination for Navarre, Florida, and your help in editing the page, so that this month, after resubmitting a good article nomination, it has been approved to become a good article, on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Navarre, Florida, I would like to award you this:

	Wikipedians of Navarre Service Award
	Awarded by a member of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Navarre, Florida, due to this user's service to aiding the advancement of Navarre, Florida, and its corresponding Wikipedia pages. Navarre0107 (talk) 15:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You!!!--Navarre0107 (talk) 15:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The oleo strut of the F.E.2's undercarriage is of course well known - and well referenced. Just two sources that come to mind are:

• Hare, Paul R. The Royal Aircraft Factory. London: Putnam, 1990. ISBN 0-85177-843-7, pp.208-209.
• Cheesman, E.F., ed. Fighter Aircraft of the 1914–1918 War. Letchworth, UK: Harleyford, 1960. pp. 44-45.

I have nonetheless run into a bit of conflict with someone with interests from "a later war" who disputes this - perhaps on the authority of works documenting more modern "oleo struts". I wonder if you could apply an impartial eye on this one? --Soundofmusicals (talk) 23:54, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Oswald Boelcke you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 12:40, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Oswald Boelcke you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Oswald Boelcke for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 02:40, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Oswald Boelcke you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Oswald Boelcke for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 05:22, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	I love the work you have done on the Werner Voss page. I have added a subject to the Talk page and value your input. Thanks! KearneyOutlaw (talk) 22:50, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		The WikiChevrons
		For you work on Rudolf Berthold you are hereby awarded these WikiChevrons. Congrats! TomStar81 (Talk) 19:30, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

		The Epic Barnstar
		For you work on Rudolf Berthold you are hereby awarded The Epic Barnstar. Congrats! TomStar81 (Talk) 19:30, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

		The World War Barnstar
		For you work on Rudolf Berthold you are hereby awarded the World War Barnstar. Congrats! TomStar81 (Talk) 19:30, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

		The Biography Barnstar
		For you work on Rudolf Berthold you are hereby awarded The Biography Barnstar. Congrats! TomStar81 (Talk) 19:30, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dicta Boelcke you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 19:40, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dicta Boelcke you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dicta Boelcke for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 02:02, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just promoted your hook to Prep 1. I was wondering what you think about identifying him, like:

... that the Dicta Boelcke, written by German flying ace Oswald Boelcke in 1916, was the world's first manual of aerial combat tactics? Yoninah (talk) 14:06, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't understand your message on my talk page. Can I add the extra words to the hook? Yoninah (talk) 17:05, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Georgejdorner,

in the articles Karl Plauth and Flying ace, the term "Überkanone(n)" appears. I can't find it anywhere else and was surprised about the term as well, but I am not knowledgeable about the topic. It has apparently already been discussed at Talk:Flying_ace and Talk:Flying_ace/Archive_1#Translation_of_the_word_.22.C3.9Cberkanone.22. Today, Hamilton McWhorter III is linked from the Main Page, in "Did you know?", prominently, with an image of a golden medal. That's how I found the "Flying ace" article, and how I found the term "Überkanone". I'm sure others will, too; would you mind if I remove it as it does seem to lack a reference?

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:37, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Friedrich Ritter von Röth you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 00:41, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Georgejdorner: How are you? I was planning to the GA review of Albert Kesselring, but I noticed you had already left a message on Hawkeye7's page on the 27th September 2020. Are you still planning to reviewing. If you weren't, I planning to start this weekend. I see it has been sitting since April waiting for a review. scope_creep^Talk 09:37, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Max Näther you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 06:02, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hans Rolfes you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Catlemur -- Catlemur (talk) 16:41, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hans Rolfes you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Hans Rolfes for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Catlemur -- Catlemur (talk) 17:21, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Friedrich Noltenius you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 09:41, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Friedrich Noltenius you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Friedrich Noltenius for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 12:42, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Max Näther you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Max Näther for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 19:01, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Max Näther you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Max Näther for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Most Comfortable Chair -- The Most Comfortable Chair (talk) 08:01, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Friedrich Ritter von Röth you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Friedrich Ritter von Röth for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 00:03, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Max Näther at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Hog Farm _Bacon 04:21, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You forgot a couple of steps in passing the nom. See WP:GAN/I.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:17, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Georgejdorner! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Black Flight eligibility, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hans Berr you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Georgejdorner -- Georgejdorner (talk) 03:01, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G'day, George, I hope you are well. I notice that you have created the GA review page for this article even though you are the nominator; was this an accident? It isn't usual for the nominator to create the review page, and often this will mean that the review will stagnate for quite some time as potential reviewers will think that the article is already under review (when it actually isn't). If it was an accident, do you wish for me to use my admin tools to delete the review page for you as a mistake? This will put the article back into the pool of unreviewed articles and allow someone else to pick up the review when they are ready. Please let me know what works for you. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 07:47, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kurt Wolff (aviator) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 07:20, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Carl Menckhoff you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 07:21, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kurt Wolff (aviator) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kurt Wolff (aviator) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 00:41, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Carl Menckhoff you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Carl Menckhoff for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 03:21, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Great work on the revisions to Karl Allmenröder's page. Sopwith07 (talk) 04:46, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Kurt Wolff (aviator) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:00, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hans Berr you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Hans Berr for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Willbb234 -- Willbb234 (talk) 11:01, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Karl Allmenröder you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Karl Allmenröder for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KommanderC -- KommanderC (talk) 17:00, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aviation is now B class for above article. I just missed it somehow. Djmaschek (talk) 19:31, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Short of an actual troll or vandal, I have never before seen such a stubborn user as User:DagneyGirl on Wikipedia. The manner in which they protest in fractured English and then conclude with "so be it" is indicative of an inability to work with others. I hope you and the various editors who take exception to their attitude, communication and editing habits are able to have them censured. Such behavior would have normally incurred at least one block by now.--Quisqualis (talk) 20:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

She has now deleted both her talk page and her contributions page to hide the evidence of her actions.Georgejdorner (talk) 19:28, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hide from whom? Another use who is unaware of contributions and page history?!--Quisqualis (talk) 22:52, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My belief that she had deleted those pages turned out to be false.

I have posted her on WP:ANI, but it does not look like they will do anything about her.Georgejdorner (talk) 18:27, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive: This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		The 100 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
		It seems that you have written 100 Did You Knows and no one has noticed (no award for 25 or 50!). That can never be the case, thousands of people will have seen your DYKs and thousands will have read your work about military operations. You have improved the front page, the DYK project and to top it all, helped to build an amazing free educational resource. So thanks - people notice. Victuallers (talk) 11:00, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I pinged you in my reply to the message you left on my start page, but perhaps that didn't show up for you. I'd love to hear your thoughts on this discussion regarding theaerodrome.com as you previously stated that "I've been explaining this every few months for the last decade". -Ljleppan (talk) 08:03, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there,

I've looked a bit more into Hefty's name being 'Friedrich' or 'Frigyes'. I found the following: in the book "Austro-Hungarian Albatros Aces of World War 1" he appears with the name 'Friedrich' and I've also found a newspaper article from the Detroit Free Press from 1965 talking about his death, and there he is also mentioned with the name 'Friedrich' (well technically, he's mentioned as 'Frederik'). However, in his book "Repülők előre!" that he wrote in 1940, he appears as 'Hefty Frigyes' (Hungarian way of writing the name, with the surname before the first name). So it does seem that he used both versions of his name, but still couldn't find what his exact birth name was. But I do think this should be mentioned in the article, maybe as a note that he used both 'Friedrich' and 'Frigyes'? Alin2808 (talk) 12:19, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:03, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Rudolf Szepessy-Sokoll at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 03:54, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About the DYK nomination for the article Minttu, I have updated the information about the current product line with a cite to Pernod Ricard's official Minttu website. JIP | Talk 01:39, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You recently reviewed the DYK nomination for Julius Busa. You seem to have linked the wrong DYK nomination at Talk:Julius Busa. Could you recheck the talk page? JIP | Talk 11:47, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 6,400 views (533.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2021 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 04:35, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive
January 2022 Backlog Drive: On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged. On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue. Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion. The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7. The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed. The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125. The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members New Members KingAviationKid (Joined on 17 December) PatrickChiao (Joined on 22 December) Wp9097 (Joined on 16 December) Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921. Closed Discussions Featured Article assessment Jim Lovell (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Good Article assessment HAL Tejas (discussion) – Closed as not promoted on 30 December 2021 William Hodgson (RAF officer) (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Supermarine Sea King (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 22 December 2021 Raymond Hesselyn (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 4 December 2021 Deletion Timeline of Berlin Brandenburg Airport's construction (discussion) – Closed as delete and redirect on 30 December 2021 Evergreen International Airlines Flight 17 (discussion) – Closed as keep on 25 December 2021 Requested moves Akbarpur (Ambedkar Nagar) Airstrip → Akbarpur Airstrip (discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 1983 Avensa Douglas DC-9 crash → Avensa Flight 007 (discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 035 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 035 (discussion) – Withdrawn on 28 December 2021	Article Statistics This data reflects values from DMY. Aviation pages by quality Quality Total FA 142 FL 15 A 56 GA 505 B 4,573 C 11,878 Start 15,082 Stub 18,754 List 2,539 Category 11,638 Disambig 653 File 2,713 Portal 629 Project 89 Redirect 1,518 Template 2,489 NA 66 Assessed 73,339 Unassessed 1 Total 73,340 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 251,753 Ω = 4.92
New/Ongoing Discussions Featured Article review D. B. Cooper (discussion) – Since 14 December 2021 A-class Article assessment Granville Gee Bee Model A (discussion) – Since 21 April 2020 List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Iraq War (discussion) – Since 22 February 2010 Good Article assessment Romanian Air Corps (discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Jean Batten (discussion) – Since 2 October 2021 Merger proposals List of astronauts by name → List of astronauts by year of selection (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of cosmonauts → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of space travelers by name → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 Holidays Czech Airlines → Czech Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 June 2021 Bendix Aviation → Bendix Corporation (discussion) – Since 30 May 2021 Airport Movement Area Safety System → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (discussion) – Since 29 May 2021 ASDE-X → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (discussion) – Since 28 May 2021 Splitting proposals Family Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 November 2021 2021 Kabul airport attack (discussion) – Since 24 September 2021 List of military aircraft of the United States (discussion) – Since 16 August 2021 Braniff International Airways (discussion) – Since 8 September 2019 Deletion List of maiden voyages (discussion) – Since 29 December 2021 Requested moves Hot-air balloon → Hot air balloon (discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 108 → Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 109 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 150 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 150 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 206 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 206 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 708 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 708 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 892 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 892 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 TWA Flight 800 → TWA Flight 800 (1996) (discussion) – Since 27 December 2021 Dynamic Airways Flight 405 → Dynamic International Airways Flight 405 (discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 CommutAir Flight 4281 → CommutAir Flight 4821 (discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Thai Airways → Thai Airways International (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Thai Airways fleet → Thai Airways International fleet (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 List of Thai Airways destinations → List of Thai Airways International destinations (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Did you know Ravish Malhotra (discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Alexander Tahy (discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 Veronica Volkersz (discussion) – Since 6 December 2021 Rudolf Szepessy-Sokoll (discussion) – Since 3 December 2021 On The Main Page Did you know... ... that the aerobatic demonstration aircraft used by SoloTürk is also used in military operations of the Turkish Air Force? (24 December)
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list. Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 10,106 views (842.2 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 03:14, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that Karl Urban (aviator) was rated B class by user:Catlemur. I questioned whether using one source was enough to disqualify an article. User:Hawkeye7 responded that using one source was not disqualifying. I think it was an honest mistake by the first reviewer. FYI: Here is the exchange. Djmaschek (talk) 05:09, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Karl Urban (aviator) - Expanded lede, added graphics, general clean up.Georgejdorner (talk) 05:48, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• ping|Georgejdorner Another good article from you, but it relies way too much on one source (O'Connor), sadly. C-class for failing b1. FredModulars (talk) 04:11, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Thank you for the assessment.Georgejdorner (talk) 18:39, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Looking at B class criteria, it doesn't appear to disqualify an article if it depends heavily on one source. Since I could be wrong, I'd like the opinion of other editors on this topic, please. Djmaschek (talk) 06:05, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Template:one source: Citing only one source is not a violation of any policy. I see no mention in our local consensus at WP:MILMOS#SOURCES, so I would not disqualify an article on this basis. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:38, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• I went ahead and assessed it as B class.--Catlemur (talk) 19:16, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • No worries. I just received another book on the Austro-Hungarian Aviation Troops. I can probably pry some more info from that.Georgejdorner (talk) 08:47, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • No additional info found.Georgejdorner (talk) 22:07, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:04, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Eight years!

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Erwin Böhme at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Maury Markowitz (talk) 17:23, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just learned that Oswald Boelcke, Theo Osterkamp and Gotthard Sachsenberg all attended the same school at the same time in Dessau. Cheers MisterBee1966 (talk) 07:17, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adolf Ritter von Tutschek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Military Merit Order.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 1 review between April and June 2022. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 07:17, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply] Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 1 review between July and September 2022. Hawkeye7 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:32, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply] Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

I just noticed that the FAC for Oswald Boelcke has been archived for lack of reviews; I would definitely have taken a look, and probably supported again, if I'd noticed it. Sorry about that -- that would have prevented it being archived, at least for a while. If you decide to nominate it again, please let me know -- it's perfectly neutral to let prior reviewers know that an article is at FAC again. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 22:58, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Mike, your offer is much appreciated. However, there was a review in progress when it was archived again, so I doubt your review would have stopped it being pulled. It has become apparent to me that I am wasting my time trying to get an A Class or FA nomination reviewed in this forum.Georgejdorner (talk) 00:16, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Sorry you feel that way, but of course it’s your call. If you do ever take another crack at FAC, with this or another article, let me know. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 00:30, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, do you happen to have information on Alexander von Winterfelt? According to my sources, he was a fighter pilot in both WW1 and WW2, with four claims in WW1. However, I don't have much information on his WW1 service. Thanks MisterBee1966 (talk) 07:06, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 18:51, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Citation Barnstar
		Thanks for your assistance in providing the Above the Trenches source for the Keith Park article, it was much appreciated! Cheers, Zawed (talk) 05:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Page references available upon request.Georgejdorner (talk) 21:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this message because you were a Good article reviewer on at least one article that is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 or you signed up for messages. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of Good articles for copyright and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent Good article reassessment and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information. A list of the GA reviewers can be found here. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. You can opt in or out of further messages at this page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		Military history reviewers' award
		On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 4 reviews between October and December 2022. Hawkeye7 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 04:17, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply] Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Wanted to drop you a note about the Sigma War Games article. I found it utterly fascinating, and was surprised I had never heard of it before, given my interests.

It appears the US managed what the games suggested would be among the best possible outcomes - stalemate followed by war weariness and increasing public opposition. But the whole thing... they themselves concluded they would lose almost every time but went in anyway to attack their former ally who was already signalling their interest in a deal. WOW.

This story should be much better known than it appears to be. Maury Markowitz (talk) 14:35, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]