Talk:Reciprocity (social psychology)

The contents of the Reciprocity bias page were merged into Reciprocity (social psychology) on 4 May 2024. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Animals Low‑importance Reciprocity (social psychology) is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. It is requested that an image or images be included in this article to improve its quality. WikiProject Animals To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some Open Tasks : Copyedit: Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species. Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae), Requests: Mammals: Invertebrates: Campocraspedon Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species. Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration Psychology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Sociology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nrubio428.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 January 2021 and 25 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jaylaa20. Peer reviewers: DkendraS.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Should there be some mention of autism in this article, as one of the required criteria for autism is a lack of social reciprocity? 24.117.64.95 (talk) 05:50, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Japanese word for 'Thank You' is 'arigato,' 'sumimasen' is a formal way to say 'excuse me,' or 'I am sorry,' when apologizing for something minor like breaking the a glass or spilling water on someone. Therefore discrediting the example. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.160.98.31 (talk) 23:35, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is a strange wording, please consider revising:

If a sufficient proportion of the population interprets the breaking of a social norm by another as a hostile action and if these people are willing to take (potentially costly) action to punish the rule-breaker then this can maintain the norm in the absence of formal sanctions. The punishing action may range from negative words to complete social ostracism.

the population interprets the breaking of a social norm by another as a hostile action

All of this is unclear...revise revise...or else I would think that it would say if 1 person out of a group of two thinks the other one is giving me the finger is an invitation to give her a punch if nobodu knew it because she is mute...

I do no not get the consequences...do you :-O) 85.81.121.107 (talk) 11:34, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

People who are unable/unwilling to reciprocate social behaviours are labelled in this article as "free riders" with a link given to an economist's definition of said phrase. This is an incredibly vague definition and no sources are given. This reeks to me of prejudice and lack of understanding of the subject matter. If edits to this article are being made as part of coursework from a University degree in psychology/sociology and these are the conclusions that are being drawn then I find that very worrying. Please revise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:25F1:A900:4025:EA1C:EC3F:E1E5 (talk) 23:01, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article has recently been edited by students as part of their course work for a university course. As part of the quality metrics for the education program, we would like to determine what level of burden is placed on Wikipedia's editors by student coursework.

If you are an editor of this article who spent time correcting edits to it made by the students, please tell us how much time you spent on cleaning up the article. Please note that we are asking you to estimate only the negative effects of the students' work. If the students added good material but you spent time formatting it or making it conform to the manual of style, or copyediting it, then the material added was still a net benefit, and the work you did improved it further. If on the other hand the students added material that had to be removed, or removed good material which you had to replace, please let us know how much time you had to spend making those corrections. This includes time you may have spent posting to the students' talk pages, or to Wikipedia noticeboards, or working with them on IRC, or any other time you spent which was required to fix problems created by the students' edits. Any work you did as a Wikipedia Ambassador for that student's class should not be counted.

Please rate the amount of time spent as follows:

• 0 -No unproductive work to clean up
• 1 - A few minutes of work needed
• 2 - Between a few minutes and half an hour of work needed
• 3 - Half an hour to an hour of work needed
• 4 - More than an hour of work needed

Please also add any comments you feel may be helpful. We welcome ratings from multiple editors on the same article. Add your input here. Thanks! -- LiAnna Davis (WMF) (talk) 19:46, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article is the subject of an educational assignment supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:25, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 January 2023 and 28 April 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kcardos2 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Kcardos2 (talk) 20:38, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]