User talk:DMahalko

I am currently writing an article on Ward leonard control, which is a type of DC motor speed control system. I noticed that you contributed on Brushed DC Electric Motor. Since I am new to wiki,it would be great if you can take a look at mine and give me some feedback or improve the acticle.Spaceel 15:26, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DMahalko, Thank you for your knowledgable contribution on dioxin to the incineration article. I have edited your contribution somewhat to integrate it better with the existing text. I also changed the info on auxiliary heatersburners, as they actually only work as backups in modern plants, not as general temperature aid. I hope you agree with these edits.

Sincerely, Claus Hindsgaul

--Claus Hindsgaul (talk) 15:14, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is a spectacular find. Good work, man. I've commented out some of the more personal notes, though - such Mahalko-focused details are really only relevant in userspace. DS (talk) 14:28, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you are not happy with any of the redraws, ie. if I've made something unclear or done it wrong, then please tell me and revert it back to the original etc. I don't really have any idea what I'm drawing, well I know enough to know that the direction of a coil is important etc., but not the specifics... so it's possible I have omitted something important or made something unclear... So just let me know :) Thanks -- Borb (talk) 14:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the excellent contribution!Kmarinas86 ^(6sin8karma) 04:26, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since you're the one who added text to WP:CMF describing how videos should not be thumb'ed or resized, could you please comment at WT:FA#Videos? I raised a question there about getting captions on embedded video (whether it should be done with thumb or with some sort of video template). Thank you, rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 03:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Pinball. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(^Õل^ō)ˀ Contribs. 18:23, 18 January 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})[reply]

Hello, DMahalko. You have new messages at WP:VPT#Image render failure: SVG containing JPG.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

PleaseStand ^(talk) 20:13, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In response to Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)/Archive_76#Somewhat_less_than_random_articles.3F, I have created the following script that you can use, called Enhanced Random Articles, which skips disambiguation and stub pages: User:Gary King/enhanced random article.js. Gary King (talk) 23:04, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I don't have much experience with Javascript, so how are exclusions specified? Are they inserted directly into the code, by replacing where you have "undefined" in there?

Also, is there a way for me to give the script a list of article title keywords to exclude?

Is this inserted into the monobook.js, or whatever it is? DMahalko (talk) 07:26, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Special:MyPage/skin.js. Insert the following code:

importScript('User:Gary King/enhanced random article.js');

enhancedRandomArticle = {};
enhancedRandomArticle.showDisambiguationPages = false;
enhancedRandomArticle.showStubs = false;
enhancedRandomArticle.patterns = [];

The .showDisambiguationPages is set to false, meaning not to show disambiguation pages (change to true to show them). Same with .showStubs; false means not to show stubs, true means to show them. The .patterns line is to exclude certain keywords from article titles. This is done like so:

.patterns = ['(album)', '(singer)', '(song)']

Which would exclude article titles with those keywords, so The Beatles (album), Pink (singer), and White Christmas (song) are excluded. Gary King (talk) 19:09, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed your recent edit of the dioxin disambiguation stub to move all information relating to dioxin toxicity and contamination incidents to the article polychlorinated dibenzodioxins. I have to say I do not agree with this decision as many incidents mentioned, such as the Irish Pork Crisis, or the Belgian incident are in fact incidents of PCB contamination, with PCDDs forming on a very minor part of the overall "dioxin like toxin" load. I think the way things are arranged currently is counterintuitive and in some ways in accurate. A discussion is ongoing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine/Toxicology_task_force#Dioxin as to the best way to re-organise the topic in a more coherent and accurate way.Arthurbagwaste (talk) 08:37, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Novell eDirectory - OUs can be trustees - no need for shadow groups.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:38, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Novell eDirectory - OUs can be trustees - no need for shadow groups.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:30, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DMahalko. You have new messages at Tom94022's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks for uploading File:Novell eDirectory - OUs can be trustees - no need for shadow groups.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:14, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Novell eDirectory - OUs can be trustees - no need for shadow groups.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:14, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that edit! I understand now. --Edcolins (talk) 11:06, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a discussion of the relevance of the section "Drive bay height" that you added to Floppy disk yesterday, on the talk page there. My apologies for not adding this notice right when I started the discussion this morning. Rwessel (talk) 19:10, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

i am interested in a popular science article on a chrysler hybrid gas turbine. how would i find it?Mkoronowski (talk) 15:46, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Start at Google Books: http://books.google.com/bkshp?hl=en&tab=wp

Though, your question intrigued me so I did the research for you. :-)

Popular Science, Sep 1973: http://books.google.com/books?id=scA6lVmzQA8C&lpg=PP1&dq=%22popular%20science%22%201973&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false

DMahalko (talk) 19:54, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

you are great! thankyou so much. you actually found the second article I was looking for. with respect to this article, i worked with pampreen who was a key contributor to chryslers work. do you think it appropriate to add this to the gas turbines article?

if you have time, can you look up a newer article about a hybrid race car engine? i designed the compressors on it.Mkoronowski (talk) 21:04, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. What an interesting...font. --Wtshymanski (talk) 21:58, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to disagree with you, but files systems are not human readable. There is surely a utility or several to display the entries is various human readable form. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DGerman (talk • contribs) 16:31, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's nice to have someone knowledgeable in that field add material. The challenge is that in it's current state it's sort of specialty sidebar comments, and on one particular method (2d image based) of 3d. Would you be interested in writing it to be more of an introduction and explanatory? Thanks. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 15:45, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be willing to do this? We sure could use this if so. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 11:50, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your addition to disk formatting because it is inaccurate when you consider all disk drive history - most media had to be formatted to be accessed by the system and it had nothing to do with the somewhat unreliable mechanisms of some disk drives. BTW you could not tilt the earliest disk drives. In essence your addition was a non-sequitor. Some disk drives had unreliable mechanisms but most did not. Your conclusion that "The initial purpose of disk formatting was therefore to compensate for these mechanism misalignments and drifting" is simply not true. Tom94022 (talk) 05:08, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Uninterruptible power supply, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. You added what seemed to be good information, however we need a source for it—do you have one? Thanks! —danhash (talk) 16:23, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Current consensus both here and on the article's Talk page is that you need to provide sourcing, Please do so or discuss the matter further rather than simply re-adding the material without references. Thank you. Doniago (talk) 21:19, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is no "consensus", it's just you and maybe Wty out of 9 billion people. DMahalko (talk) 21:21, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was looking at the top 30 newsgroups in the article Usenet.[1]. Since this comes from early 2008, it might be helpful to update it. I would wager that alt.binaries.boneless is still at number one, but could not find an updated chart despite searching on Google. Could you help here? Thanks.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 22:45, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you are a Giganews subscriber, the current list can most likely be derived from your newsreader's list of newsgroups, such as NewsBin. I currently do not have a UseNet subscription. DMahalko (talk) 01:16, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

After some searching, here is a current list from Easynews. As predicted, alt.binaries.boneless is still out in front in the #1 position, but the other places have changed since 2008.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 20:06, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited IBM Personal System/2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IDE (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Pigging, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ultrasonic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Linear actuator, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rotor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Dot matrix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Embossed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Television licence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Off-the-shelf (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
	For finding and adding useful and beautiful public domain images, as well as producing some original images and donating them to Wikipedia. Reify-tech (talk) 14:22, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		Video Barnstar
		For your excellent videos on farming, I hereby award you a one-of-a-kind barnstar. Your efforts are seen and appreciated! Royalbroil 02:43, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I second this note of thanks. A video like Commons:File:Forage harvester - forage wagon 320x240.ogv is an excellent contribution to making Wikipedia's coverage of economically important topics what it should be. Everyone relies on agriculture and industry for their material existence, but many people do not work in those areas and are not raised by parents who do, so if we expect people to be informed/educated about these major aspects of the world, we need good Wikipedia content to help inform them. Thanks for leading the way on that. Quercus solaris (talk) 16:47, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Bearing (mechanical), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grease (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:44, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited LaserWriter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daisy-chaining (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Active directory - OUs can not be given rights to objects.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:28, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Off line regulator, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electronic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:45, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting a comment Talk:Novell eDirectory#Netware Name Service --Vssun (talk) 04:59, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For the purposes of vectorizing and editing your image(s), I'm asking for your help in uploading source files for the following images: File:Building Plenum - NoPlenum.png File:Building_Plenum_-_Normal.png File:BuildingPlenum-Unintended-BiggerYellow.png

If you want to assist me, please upload the original source files created in Microsoft Word 2007 to this site: http://commonsarchive.org (see the scope of the project here: http://commonsarchive.org/wiki/Commons_Archive:Project_scope).

When/if you upload the source files there, please alert me here or on my talk page.

Thank you in advance.

Zerodamage (talk) 08:30, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Active directory - OUs can not be given rights to objects.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:01, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've created the first catalog page by adapting content from Automotive light sources. Notice the images do not render in the catalog wiki. Kindly please assist? Thanks —Scheinwerfermann ^T·_C22:18, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1. I have migrated all images over from the Commons to Wikia, citing the Commons page for each one, for source/attribution.

2. Added References/Reflist to bottom. Where'd it go from the original?

3. Converted article wikilinks so that they still point back to Wikipedia-en. Underscores are needed in place of spaces for the cross-wiki link to work:

[[Wikipedia:Daytime_running_lamp|Daytime running lamp]]

(Oh wait, maybe not. A lack of underscores is not breaking cross-wiki links for article: http://catalog.wikia.com/wiki/List_of_7400_series_integrated_circuits

The Wikia easy-editing GUI does not handle the display of reference tags properly, but it all works normally as on Wikipedia after clicking Publish. To edit references, and links back to Wikipedia, use the "edit as Source" tab at the top.

Also I see on some occasions, wikipedia Templates will need to be copied over to Wikia but it's a one-time issue, and they appear to work properly over there.

DMahalko (talk) 00:47, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire‎. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Mesconsing (talk) 23:51, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Flywheel energy storage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fatigue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I commented on your post about NTIS here; let me know if I can help. -- phoebe / (talk to me) 17:24, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Intel Atom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ECC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Вітаю! Прочитав на вашій основній сторінці розділ про мови. Я так розумію, що Ви з нашої діаспори. Цікаво, а Ви трохи українською (русинською) розмовляєте чи тільки виключно англійською спілкуєтесь? Якщо трохи володієте українською мовою, то можна було б більш якісно висвітлити деякі теми українського життя у англомовній вікіпедії. З повагою --ConsigliereUA ^(talk) 19:00, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Google Translate, Ukrainian to English

Collaboration

Greetings!I read on your main page section about language. I understand that you are in our diaspora. I wonder You little Ukrainian (Ruthenian) speak only English or only communicate? If a little speak Ukrainian, it could be more efficiently highlight some themes Ukrainian life in the English Wikipedia. Yours - ConsigliereUA (Talk) seven p.m., 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Sorry I don't speak anything other than English. Even with the Google translate, I don't understand what you are trying to say. DMahalko (talk) 03:25, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I undid your edit to Wikipedia:Spam. While what you say is true, that page is about other types of spam.

I don't know the best place to put such information, this isn't it. Perhaps you could write a user essay about the topic. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 00:11, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is on topic and relevant to the article. That article is about all types of spam, as it is simply titled "Spam". The article is not titled "Wikipedia:Article Spam".

If I were to follow your logic then the most appropriate action is to turn the article into a disambiguation page, and create two new sub-articles, titled "Article Spam" and "Editor Spam".

DMahalko (talk) 06:26, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think the confusion is that the page is NOT an article, it is a "project page," that is, a page about or for the benefit of the administration of the English Wikipedia or the community of Wikipedia editors. Despite the title, is not meant to be a compendium of all possible ways spam interacts with Wikipedia. It doesn't deal with IRC-spam on Wikipedia IRC channels, for example. If you really want to get it added to that page, you might try opening a discussion on Wikipedia talk:Spam and see what the community consensus is. The article is Spam, which is about spam in general. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 16:55, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DMahalko. FYI, I've marked your August 17, 2008 edit to RS-485 as dubious. Please see Talk:RS-485#Star unavoidable with PTZ cameras?. Thanks. jhawkinson (talk) 17:12, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Open Office detects redirected App Data in use on another roaming account.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:36, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Your videos on hay baling are enlightening, and help the reader/viewer learn much more about the process compared to only text and still images. I personally found them fascinating. Thanks. 98.215.55.215 (talk) 15:51, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Active directory - OUs can not be given rights to objects.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:36, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Shake well has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not WP:NOTABLE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:45, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(This discussion is more appropriate on the article talk page. Moving to Talk:Diving_weighting_system#Is_lead_toxicity_worth_discussing_here.3F.) -- DMahalko (talk) 19:42, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Duracell AA crop.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:55, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited System administrator, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hacker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Intel Active Management Technology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 3rd party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You still have these?

I would suggest getting someone like the Internet Archive to scan them, then the scans can be ranscribed on Wikisource possibly. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:53, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's not really necessary, as they are already scanned by Google Books and listed on the article page for them: Hawkins Electrical Guide -- DMahalko (talk) 19:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DMahalko. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback at the dishwasher article. Lots of people would think what you were thinking and not say anything. I appreciate you speaking up so that I can adapt. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:17, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Quasi-governmental, DMahalko!

Wikipedia editor Emir of Wikipedia just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please see Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_November_28#Quasi-governmental. --

To reply, leave a comment on Emir of Wikipedia's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:23, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DMahalko. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I'm not quite sure what the bibliography section is for at New Rome, Ohio. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:21, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am only fixing the broken links. I assume they should be turned into inline citations, but I don't have much interest in this so will leave it to someone else to finish. -- DMahalko (talk) 06:25, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DMahalko. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DMahalko. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:IE7 Errors caused by 10000 GDI Objects 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Interlaced video and crawling scanlines.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Alt.binaries.boneless has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is no indication that this newsgroup has ever been studied.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 08:09, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Indent-fix-begin has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:44, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Indent-fix-end has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:44, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Moving Coil Voltage Regulator.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, superseded by File:Moving Coil Voltage Regulator.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:22, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on MacMall, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:46, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inertia negation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inertia negation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:23, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zero seek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zero seek until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:32, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Refrigerate after opening is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Refrigerate after opening until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:36, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bender Machine Works is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bender Machine Works until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:41, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article High school rank is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High school rank until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:05, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inertia damper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inertia damper until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 00:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Unlooper has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced for 10 years. My BEFORE shows very few uses. Very niche gadget/tech with dubious notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:45, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]