Jump to content

Talk:GUM (department store)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 23:23, 14 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Shopping Centers}}, {{WikiProject Russia}}, {{WikiProject Soviet Union}}, {{WikiProject Brands}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

GUM's history

[edit]

The first two paragraphs about the building's history make no chronological sense. First, it talks about the late-19th century building (the current one), then it talks about Catherine the Great about 100 years earlier, then a sudden mention of a 3rd building that existed between Catherine's and the current one, designed by some Joseph Bove? I'm not questioning these facts. I'm just pointing out that these two paragraphs are confusing, because they were not written in chronological order. The source that this information was taken from is a Russian-language website. Can a Russian speaker give that website a fresh look, and edit these two paragraphs, so that they make sense? Skyduster (talk) 04:48, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GUM

[edit]

Gum!? Who would call it "Gum?"

It's an acronym, think CREEP. 68.39.174.238 04:30, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article talks about several stores within the building. Wouldn't that make it a mall, not a department store?

Perhaps it would now be classed as a "mall" (in America at least), but when it was built, Russia (or the USSR as it was) was under communism, so it was just one big, state run, department store containing all that the government thought that the people would want to buy. Of course, with the collapse of the soviet republic, and the fairly rapid introduction of capitalism, many different brands and shops have moved into the GUM building (in Moscow). So really, times have changed since the building was built, but it still reatins, to an extent, its old charcter of being one big shop, although it is now split up between brands. Martinp23 20:07, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question

[edit]

About ten years ago, during a game of Trivial Persuit, I responded to the question "What is the largest department store in the world?" with GUM. The "correct" response was, of course, "Macy's, NYC". I still think I'm right. The article could benefit from some actual size information -- square footage, etc. And a comparison to Macy's probably wouldn't be unencyclopedic. —  MusicMaker5376 17:01, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Probably Macy's. But it's also a "mall" - indoor covered with different shops - maybe a bit smaller than the old Marshall Fields store in downtown Chicago.

Smallbones (talk) 04:34, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What did GUM formerly stand for?

[edit]

Currently only the present explanation of the abbreviation is given, as "Main Department Store". Later in the article it is mentioned that the "G" in the name formerly stood for "Gosudarstvennyj", but that word is not translated into English nor shown in Russian characters anywhere in the article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:23, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

State Universal Store.--Dojarca (talk) 03:45, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Party officials only?

[edit]

I'd always heard that GUM was only open to officials of the Communist Party and their families, etc. Any truth to that? 173.81.169.24 (talk) 02:32, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@173.81.169.24 No, just the "Section 200", a special section of it, where the BOSCO Bar now is placed. --YOMAL SIDOROFF-BIARMSKII (talk) 22:52, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.giovannardierontini.it/
    Triggered by \bgiovannardierontini\.it\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 16:49, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One of the few stores in the Soviet Union that did not have shortages of consumer goods

[edit]

Really? I remember visits there in the 1970s, and like any other store at the time, you couldn't actually buy anything. The TV department had a single color TV on display with hoards of kids crowded around watching it, but you couldn't buy one. The jewelry department had a watch display case full of not watches, but pictures of watches. You could buy shoes but the prices were higher than black market. You would go there to hang out and eat cucumber salad in the snack bar, not to buy. I don't remember lines to get in, but there were lines at any of the few departments that had anything to sell. Kendall-K1 (talk) 02:08, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on GUM (department store). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:36, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]