Talk:Neo-Confucianism

This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Philosophy: Social and political / Eastern High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Social and political philosophy Eastern philosophy

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2020 and 16 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ethanabca. Peer reviewers: KarenRCC.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:31, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2019 and 6 December 2019.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:06, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is a misspelling of the Qin Dynasty. See quote of the text "... It is very related to Confucianists in the Qing Dynasty of China and other dynasties..." I believe this is meant for the "Qin" dynasty which was the unified empire after the Warring States. Qin (246BC to 207BC) preceded Qing(1662 to 1911) by almost 2000 years. Neo-confucianism was at its peak during the Song dynasty(960 to 1276) This should be edited because of the link to the later dyansty.

This is a very good article!!!Neo-Confucianism was NOT the mainstream during the Song Dynasty. It was treated as heresy. It was during the Yuan Dynasty when Neo-Confucianism was taken for the Imperial examination for the first time. That made Neo-Confucianism gain strength. I think it became the mainstream during the Ming Dynasty. --Nanshu 03:17, 12 Oct 2003 (UTC)

I've modified to reflex this. --Menchi 03:55, 12 Oct 2003 (UTC)

If your "Neo-Confucianism" is merely "Dao Xue" (which was used by Zhu Xi and his fellow scholars for referring to themselves), it was treated as heresy and it was not the mainstream during the Song Dynasty. However, sometime we use "Neo-Confucianism" also to include those Zhu Xi's opponents and his predecessors (at least in some Chinese texts). In this usage, I think it was the mainstream during the Song Dynasty. Ye Shi was one of the most prominent opponent of Zhu Xi, and he advocate something like "merchantilism" and "utilitarianism" in Western thought. (Actually, I think Ye's thought is only a form of consequentialism. But in Chinese, "Gong Li Lun" stands for a paraphrase of "utilitarianism", and it can also refer to Ye's philosophy.) There were many conflicting Confucian schools of thought in Song dynasty, but we sometime use "Neo-Confucianism" refer all of them. (P.S. Sorry for my poor English......:( )220.139.235.179 (talk) 19:31, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder why Zhang Sanfeng appears in the list: he has been known as a martial artist but not as a Neo-Confucianist. Ktsquare (talk) 17:11, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)

uh...

what's with the doubling

gelo 07:12, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To begin with, Confucianism is designed to be secular oriented and mainly focused on formulating a moral construct in order to foster a most desirable and harmonious environment in which people could live honorably and prosper in turn. It preoccupied itself primarily on the realm of ethics, social science and political philosophy. In contrast with the Western tradition, theology, natural philosophy, the precursor of modern science, metaphysics, ontology, aesthetics, epistemology, logics, freedom, and liberation, these quintessential schools of thoughts which built the foundation of Western civilization are innately nil in the teachings of Confucius. That is simply a given, for Confucius, his peers, and his disciples, who shall be considered as the paleo-Confucians, had never encountered anything from the West, and simply had to make dues with the existing autochthonous traditions and ideas. Historically, it is Taoism which added much substances in the field of natural philosophy, aesthetics, epistemology, and freedom, while Buddhism acted likewise in the field of theology and metaphysics. Nevertheless, since the Han dynasty officially enshrined that Confucianism as the state sponsored ideology, which exercised its domination for the next two thousands years, the subsequent Confucians, much like a priesthood of a society, had much bearing and influence on the intellectual character of the Chinese for the next two millenniums. In effect, their main contribution isn't necessarily a philosophical breakthrough, but a refinement on bureaucracy and civil service examinations for the new mandarins. They churned out tomes of exegesis of the Confucian canons; ameliorated the poetic verses with all the grace and elegance; blossomed a classic tradition of literary panache; institutionalized the Confucian ethics into the cult of ancestral worship, monarchic loyalty, and patriarchic dogmatism as the most sincere form of orthodox piety; they engineered generations of intellectuals, scholars , and bureaucrats who essentially repeated and refined the previous accomplishments without adding new blood into the aging body. Whereas some sinologists argued that with the introduction of Buddhism which ultimately gave a resurgence in the Song dynasty called Neo-Confucianism, the case is insubstantial and the coinage a misnomer. The new school in Song dynasty founded by Zhu Xi 朱熹 shall be viewed in a historical perspective as the Meso-Confucianism, who simply reinterpreted the authenticity of Confucian orthodox in the lexicons of Buddhism and Taoism. Namely, he consecrated the most noble virtues and honors of Confucian ethics with a dash of religious aura by commandeering phrases in the Chinese vernaculars which were traditionally associated with the nonsecular realm, such as Tianli 天理, or Heavenly Doctrine, Dao 道 or Taoism, and Qi 气 or spiritual energy. The whole monumental effort was really to justify Confucian principles as a form of universal truth. Furthermore, he was the key architect who compiled the canons of Confucianism known as the Four Books (The Great Learning, Doctrine of the Mean, The Analects of Confucius, and Mencius), which had a tremendous impact on the education of subsequent generations of Chinese for almost another millennium. In a nutshell, the Meso-Confucians helped in buttressing the foundation of Confucianism by elevating it to an universal and heavenly status, systematized its doctrines, and codified its teachings. That is all.

-- Dachuxing, an excerpt from Grand Strategy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.131.195.142 (talk) 21:10, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To my colleagues on wikipedia I found very few suggestions to give on this article of Neo-Confucianism. In the origins section, while the idealistic origins of Neo-Confucianism are widely proven, there is a lack of geographical background given to pretext the references ideologies. There is a lack of footnotes given in the sections discussing the two different types of schooling. Also, when discussing the general rejection of of a relationship between the reincarnation and karma from the Neo-Confucians it mentions how several Neo-Confucians had different ideas about how to address this relationship, but goes into almost no detail about any of those methods of the Neo-Confucians behind them. Hagriff1 (talk) 07:13, 26 September 2017 (UTC)hagriff1 (talk) 12:12, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Neo-Confucianism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110614035130/http://www.ekoreajournal.net/upload/html/HTML43412.html to http://www.ekoreajournal.net/upload/html/HTML43412.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:20, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For over a year, this article has included an apparent historical error. The article was edited in 2016 to describe a person named "Xi Ling" instead of "Zhu Xi." If this edit was an intentional hoax, then it might be necessary to peer-review this article to prevent this from happening again. Jarble (talk) 01:34, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I propose the Vietnamese name be given as "Tông-Minh Lý Học" which is more fully cognate with the other languages given. Karen-bmi30 (talk) 11:38, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The text does say that Neo-Confucianism incorporated things from Buddhism and Taoism (although it also says it rejected them and especially their supernatural elements), but it should explain more clearly what it added that original Confucianism didn't have. I understand that actual Neo-Confucians, like many such renovators of traditional doctrines, would rather claim that they just preserve and elucidate the true original teaching of Confucius. But the very acceptance of a concept such as Neo-Confucianism presupposes that it at least specifies important things that weren't specified in original Confucianism. 62.73.69.121 (talk) 09:23, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]