Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names
Navigation: Archives • Instructions for closing administrators • |
This page is for bringing attention to usernames which may be in violation of Wikipedia's username policy. Before listing a username here, consider if it should be more appropriately reported elsewhere, or if it needs to be reported at all:
- Report blatantly inappropriate usernames, such as usernames that are obscene or inflammatory, to Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention.
- For other cases involving vandalism, personal attacks or other urgent issues, try Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents; blatant vandalism can also be reported at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, which is sometimes a better option.
Do NOT post here if:
- the user in question has made no recent edits.
- you wish to have the block of a user reviewed. Instead, discuss the block with the blocking administrator (see also Wikipedia:Blocking policy § Unblocking).
Before adding a name here you MUST ensure that the user in question:
- has been warned about their username (with e.g. {{subst:uw-username}}) and has been allowed time to address the concern on their user talk page.
- has disagreed with the concern, refused to change their username and/or continued to edit without replying to the warning.
- is not already blocked.
If, after having followed all the steps above, you still believe the username violates Wikipedia's username policy, you may list it here with an explanation of which part of the username policy you think has been violated. After posting, please alert the user of the discussion (with e.g. {{subst:UsernameDiscussion}}). You may also invite others who have expressed concern about the username to comment on the discussion by use of this template.
Add new requests below, using the syntax {{subst:rfcn1|username|2=reason ~~~~}}.
Tools: Special:ListUsers, Special:BlockList
Kevinkillsfosho (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Username implies intent to comit violence--Heliac 16:48, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Allow - committing violence in the real world, no? Kevin can't kill anyone on WP last time I checked!--Ed ¿Cómo estás? 17:13, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Allow -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Allow Why not? No violation here. Wǐkǐɧérṃǐť(Talk) (Contributions) 17:16, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Allow Agree with the previous two comments. TortureIsWrong 17:20, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
SexySpeclilmami09 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Username is sexually suggestive--Heliac 16:51, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Allow - no vio of WP:U--Ed ¿Cómo estás? 17:15, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Allow WP:U#Sexual says "sexual acts, genitalia, or sexual orientation", simply being sexy is not a violation. HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 17:15, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Disallow - Refers to sexual incitement [1] which implies the rest. The Behnam 17:17, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Allow Per HighinBC. Wǐkǐɧérṃǐť(Talk) (Contributions) 17:17, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Allow - weve had this before. weve concluded sexy is not innapropriate. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:18, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Pzzy puss (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Username is sexually suggestive--Heliac 16:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Allow - A puss is a cat? I see no vandalistic intent here. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:15, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Allow Please re-read the WP:U#Sexual policy and explain how this is in violation. HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 17:17, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Allow - I believe that when it is doubled like that it most certainly refers to a cat. The Behnam 17:18, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Neutral - puss is alt sp for pussy, possible reference to fem genitalia, possible vio of WP:U--Ed ¿Cómo estás? 17:18, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Allow What about the Pussycat dolls? Per Chrislk02. Wǐkǐɧérṃǐť(Talk) (Contributions) 17:20, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Double Dickel (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Username is sexually suggestive--Heliac 16:57, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Allow Please re-read the WP:U#Sexual policy and explain how this is in violation. HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 17:17, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Allow - dickel != dick. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:19, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Allow no vio of WP:U#Sexual--Ed ¿Cómo estás? 17:20, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Allow Per HighinBC. Wǐkǐɧérṃǐť(Talk) (Contributions) 17:20, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
MON3YcantBuyLOV3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Contains copywrited lyrics, SHOUTS IN ALL CAPS, and is written in l33t which may give the impression of randomness--Heliac 16:59, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Allow This is a common phrase, and 1337 is not random. ShadowHalo 17:16, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Allow - nothing against leet in policy. I see nothing wrong with thism, there is no apparent randomness to it. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:17, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Allow No copyright issue, common phrase predates song, not violation. HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 17:19, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Allow Nothing wrong here. Wǐkǐɧérṃǐť(Talk) (Contributions) 17:21, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Greenappledesign (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
spam for a business --Heliac 16:59, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Disallow [2] ShadowHalo 17:18, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Disallow Promotional username. HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 17:18, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
JUSTTHEREFORLOVE (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
All CAPS--Heliac 17:00, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Allow So far as I know, all caps are allowed. ShadowHalo 17:17, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Allow - nothing wrong with that. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:17, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Allow Please re-read the WP:U policy and explain how this is in violation. HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 17:17, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Xxlostxxangelxx (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Contains numerous repititions of XX + username has religous overtones, may offend Christians--Heliac 17:01, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment How is this an obvious violation? And if it were, why isn't this being reported at WP:AIV? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ShadowHalo (talk • contribs) 17:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC).
- Allow It is not an obvious violation, or a violation at all. It was rejected from WP:AIV. HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 17:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Allow -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:15, 30 March 2007 (UTC)