User talk:Davidgoodheart/Archive 4

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Davidgoodheart. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Why did you remove my current talk page and added old and archived threads to my talk page? --BabbaQ (talk) 08:51, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

@BabbaQ: It was a mistake as I must have clicked on your old history by mistake as I was removing a space for you. Sorry about that! Davidgoodheart (talk) 17:54, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

No worries. Just got a bit confused. :)--BabbaQ (talk) 18:27, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

"as I was removing a space for you".  I wanted to see who was the editor that made multiple edits in the Fried Green Tomatoes film article that involved spaces (1, 2, 3) -- spaces that had not affected the display of content. And I saw your above reply to the editor asking why you had removed their current talk page and added old and archived threads. So I checked your edits on that editor's talk page and saw these: a, b, c, d, e. None of these are edits made to content written and posted by you.
I've been on Wikipedia long enough to know that there are editors with compulsive impulses, and for the most part minor compulsive edits are harmless. But a user's talk page is a personal space. You cannot indulge compulsive preferences when it involves the comments of other editors (including messages/announcements posted with bots), and you certainly cannot edit the format and display of another editor's talk page (unless you obtained their permission to do it beforehand). So I am leaving this comment to make you aware of WP:TPG -- specifically regarding WP:TPO. [Just in case ... do not make edits to this comment by me, be they in spaces or wiki markup (see WP:TPO).] Pyxis Solitary (yak). L not Q. 06:04, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

@Pyxis Solitary: The editor has stated in the past that they don't care if I edit their talkpage. I am also on good terms with this editor as well. Davidgoodheart (talk) 16:35, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

@Pyxis Solitary: Thanks for letting me know this as you do have the right to express your concerns. Davidgoodheart (talk) 16:47, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Very well, then. I am glad to hear that. Ciao! Pyxis Solitary (yak). L not Q. 09:25, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of people who disappeared mysteriously at sea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Costa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John and Gillian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Junkyard.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly.

For your move of Death of Gabby Petito without reading the heading. wizzito | say hello! 00:52, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

@Wizzito: I KNOW that and that is why I reverted it, and I DO feel silly as I didn't read the heading before I did that. Davidgoodheart (talk) 00:55, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

I noticed someone reverted your removal of a bunch of content from the list. Just letting you know so maybe you can restore it again. There's a couple people you should watch out for that are going around and trying to forcibly chop down any long articles into smaller articles. Ergzay (talk) 15:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

@Ergzay: Do you mean the Unidentified serial killers who were removed or do you mean the fugitives from justice who are no longer sought? Davidgoodheart (talk) 16:02, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello I saw that you were a primary editor of the Wiki entry for Text Messaging. I have historical information to add but I have never added anything to Wikipedia before. May I send you the information for your guidance on how to add it to the historical section of the page?

Many thanks,

Jvasilatos (talk) 04:45, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

	The 100,000 edits barnstar
	Thank you for all your contributions. Hope to see you around for a lot more years to come —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 00:03, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

PS: I saw you crossed 100,000 edits, and wanted to be the first one to congratulate you. I couldn't find any appropriate barnstar for the situation, so I created this one, I hope you like it. Thanks again, —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 00:03, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations, Davidgoodheart.--Kieronoldham (talk) 19:39, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Felicitations. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:20, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Please review the edits I have made on your page. Just wanna ensure I have made the actual tweaks and insertions you requested.--Kieronoldham (talk) 19:22, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

@Kieronoldham: Good job! But please change the wording "I have" and "thanks me". Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:29, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Done. You are a lot higher than me on this list. Doubt you'll ever catch the likes of users BrownHairedGirl or Materialscientist in terms of total number of edits though. ;) Maybe by 2028 or so I'll have reached your milestone.--Kieronoldham (talk) 19:48, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Sorry, I saw your message just now. I think your request has been fulfilled. Let me know if there is anything else :-) —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 17:27, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

@Usernamekiran: If you can make me some userboxes sometime that would be great. Davidgoodheart (talk) 17:41, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I hope everything is well with you. I have been improving the article about Lars Vilks. He died yesterday. He has been the victim of several crimes over the years and some people suspect murder when it comes to his untimely death. --BabbaQ (talk) 16:25, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

@BabbaQ: Hi, it's good to hear from you! Sorry to hear about the death of Lars Vilks as untimely deaths are often sad. I am dealing with a lot of issues right now. I will get back to you soon. Davidgoodheart (talk) 21:59, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

I have had a lot to do myself as of recent. Because of the murder of rapper Einár, I improved the article so it could appear at RD on the main page. Also created Einár discography and an article about one of his kidnappers Haval.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:10, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

@BabbaQ: Very interesting! I am very eager to talk and will get back to you as soon as I can as I have a lot going on right now. Davidgoodheart (talk) 00:21, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

I have created an article about the Disappearance of Helena Andersson in 1992. Without a doubt one of Swedens most publicized crime cases.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:46, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

@BabbaQ: Great job! I had it added to the List of people who disappeared list. I will get back to you as soon as I can as I am facing some serious issues right now. Davidgoodheart (talk) 01:49, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

How are things, Davidgoodheart? I seriously can't find much of substance to add to the Idris Khattak article. --Kieronoldham (talk) 01:42, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

@Kieronoldham: I have a lot going on right now for sure. As for Khattak it doesn't need any more sources added. I will make an infobox for it soon and add a few touchups and then see how it looks. It may be then okay to add to the List of kidnappings as it is not a major disappearance that has much coverage. Davidgoodheart (talk) 03:18, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

That's reassuring to know. I noted a lack of English language articles out there. Some trivial aspects (daughter's travelling alone safety concerns within that area of Pakistan etc.) could be added, but not too much of real substance for the article itself.--Kieronoldham (talk) 03:41, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

				All the best!
				Have a good Christmas, Davidgoodheart. All the best for 2022.--Kieronoldham (talk) 01:04, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

@*Treker: and the same to you too! Davidgoodheart (talk) 02:33, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to List of people who disappeared mysteriously: post-1990. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

How 'bout this?--Kieronoldham (talk) 23:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Chrome-like finish. --Kieronoldham (talk) 00:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Here yous go.--Kieronoldham (talk) 01:02, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Please see my proposal to speedily rename subcategories of Category:Enforced disappearances by country e.g. Category:Forced disappearances in Argentina to Category:Enforced disappearances in Argentina to align with the parent category per C2C. Hugo999 (talk) 04:12, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Pilaz (talk) 23:12, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Davidgoodheart, Star Mississippi, Schazjmd: courtesy ping, FYI. Pilaz (talk) 23:17, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

You are hereby requested to stop your disruptive voting at Articles for Deletion. You have spammed the same copypasted rationale on multiple deletion discussions at the very same minute within the past week:

• 21:51, 3 February 2022 (UTC): diff1, diff2, diff3, diff4, diff5
• 22:15, 3 February 2022 (UTC): diff6, diff7, diff8, diff9
• 03:46, 2 February 2022 (UTC): diff10.

This behavior has been going on at AfD for months. I recommend you stop engaging with AfD discussions since you are uninterested in assessing the claims brought forward by other editors. I will be asking an admin to strike all your current votes in light of this, and future violations will be brought to ANI. Pilaz (talk) 18:36, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

• David, I note here that you do not even attempt to hide that you're copy/pasting your votes. I advised @Pilaz: that I am unable to look into this right now as I'm going offline, but strongly suggest you take Pilaz' warning and mine under advisement. Please evaluate each article based on notability criteria, not the desires of other contributors. Star Mississippi 18:50, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

@Pilaz: OK, fine I WON'T do it anymore. but please don't ask them to remove my votes as I don't that it would warrant that, I never thought that copypasting was against the rules. Davidgoodheart (talk) 20:09, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Please review WP:AFDEQ, WP:DISCUSSAFD, WP:PERX/WP:EVERYONEELSE. AfD is not a vote. Editors are meant to individually review the claims of the nominator and of their peers and produce an informed judgement, not a blanket judgement like you have. The fact that you didn't even bother to remotely alter your copypasted "vote" and that you produced several "votes" within the same minute are extremely serious evidence that you didn't even read the articles you were expressing your opinion about. Since they undermine the integrity of the AfD process, since you didn't bother editing half of them (like you have claimed below), and since I've already asked two AfD admins to deal with this outside of ANI, I will heed Star Mississippi's advice and bring this to ANI. Pilaz (talk) 21:07, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

@Star Mississippi: I never knew that copypasting was against the rules and also I felt the same about each article. I have now removed my votes and re-added them all re-worded. I won't this again. Davidgoodheart (talk) 20:32, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

@Pilaz: What's an ANI? You also said future vilolations would be brought there. Since I didn't know about this I think that you shouldn't take it there until I do this again and I won't. Davidgoodheart (talk) 21:22, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

I think it's worth mentioning that Davidgoodheart has been making similar comments on AfDs since January 2019 but this is the first indication I can find that anyone has discussed his AfD comments with him. It can be hard to improve when nobody has let you know that you've done anything incorrectly. Davidgoodheart, I hope you will review the links that Pilaz provided and use them to improve your AfD participation. Schazjmd (talk) 21:52, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Although this is a major blow to the integrity of AfD discussions, I agree with you Schazjmd. The proper way forward, imo, is to strike the current open !votes and to leave this user a second chance, albeit with a warning. I'm still going to bring this to WP:ANI to get those votes stricken and to raise awareness. Pilaz (talk) 21:58, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Since you may be unfamiliar with norms, editing others' comments without indicating it is also poor form. I find it surprising that an editor of your tenure doesn't know ANI Star Mississippi 22:52, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

• They were also warned in September 2021 about this [1] by Pyxis Solitary and have repeatedly altered other people's comments without their consent: [2] is an example among others. Per WP:ETIQUETTE: Though editing articles is acceptable and encouraged, editing the signed words of another editor on a talk page or other discussion page is generally not acceptable, as it can alter the meaning of the original comment and misrepresent the original editor's thoughts. Avoid editing another editor's comments unless necessary. Pilaz (talk) 11:19, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Star Mississippi 13:09, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Death of Manon Dubé, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Manon Dubé (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

I'll make the expansions you requested shortly. K.--Kieronoldham (talk) 06:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

By community consensus as determined at ANI, you are topic-banned from participating in the WP:AfD process for three months, except as concerns articles you yourself created. Because this is formulated as a topic ban, rather than a page ban, I understand it to also include WP:DRV insofar as the deletion of articles is concerned, but not WP:MfD, WP:TfD, etc. Sandstein 15:38, 9 February 2022

@Sandstein: What day does my ban expire? Davidgoodheart (talk) 15:54, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Three months after the closure of the ANI thread, 15:36, 9 February 2022 (UTC). I'll let you do the math. Sandstein 16:27, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

This any good, Davidgoodheart?--Kieronoldham (talk) 08:57, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

@Kieronoldham: Yes, that's really good!, Please make the final touches in the wording so that it is shorter an reads like the other userboxes. Davidgoodheart (talk) 15:11, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

'Bout this?--Kieronoldham (talk) 18:48, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

@Kieronoldham: That's really good and it can stay like that, but what I meant was change the wording to look of this {User:Kieronoldham/Userboxes/VinylRevival} which is a shorter version of wording.

Looks a heck of a lot better now, Davidgoodheart.--Kieronoldham (talk) 13:04, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Any good?--Kieronoldham (talk) 15:10, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• @Kieronoldham: That's fine. Davidgoodheart (talk) 16:43, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Any adjustments feel free to suggest. Not sure if they were the ten cent bottles you mentioned. Regards, --Kieronoldham (talk) 16:59, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

@Kieronoldham: Yeah, I meant the ones that were wider and said non-refillable on them. Davidgoodheart (talk) 17:01, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

You'd have to send me a Commons image link. Ben Shaws glass pop bottles are probably the earliest glass 75p - £1 bottles I can recall. (Sold off a milk float and returnable.)--Kieronoldham (talk) 17:20, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

@Kieronoldham: This scene Pepsi bottles scene from this 1987 movie shows glass bottles that are the right kind. Davidgoodheart (talk) 17:24, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

No worries. Nothing to apologize for, Davidgoodheart. I knew it was not your intention. You'll have to forgive me too - I was irritable yesterday afternoon as I found out I was unsuccessful in a job application I had my heart set upon. (Can't stand being unemployed.) I'll check the commons later today for you.--Kieronoldham (talk) 11:08, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

This image a better one? --Kieronoldham (talk) 14:12, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Whattaya you think of this, Davidgoodheart? I like this one. Matter o' fact, I'll add that to my own page. Still recall when Ghostbusters 2 was in the cinema.--Kieronoldham (talk) 22:24, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

@Kieronoldham: It's a good one, thanks. Davidgoodheart (talk) 01:48, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Hope all's well for you, Davidgoodheart. Hope I didn't offend you with the refusal of adjusting my page. You are more than welcome to offer proposals of edits. Part of the refusal reasoning was you stating you'd been banned from AFD for a fixed term. Keep in touch. Key.--Kieronoldham (talk) 02:02, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

@Kieronoldham: You have granted me access to edit your talk page, which is what I was asking. I had no intent of editing your userpage, which you declined. Davidgoodheart (talk) 02:08, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, you wrote "your page without asking you." This could have referred to either page (user or talk). Ambiguous. No worries. K.--Kieronoldham (talk) 02:14, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

	The Hard Worker's Barnstar
	A much deserved barnstar in recognition of your efforts to improve and expand criminal biographies! Your work does not go unnoticed! BabbaQ (talk) 09:26, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

@BabbaQ: Thanks, it's so nice to hear that! I will get back to you in a short while as I am not so active at the moment. Davidgoodheart (talk) 23:03, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

@BabbaQ: Happy Easter! Davidgoodheart (talk) 22:06, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Same to you, Davidgoodheart.--Kieronoldham (talk) 00:20, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

I cannot see anything in the article that indicates he was ever missing.--Kieronoldham (talk) 21:38, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

This any good, Davidgoodheart?--Kieronoldham (talk) 02:03, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I've noticed that you have messed around with the categories on the external links section for no reason. While your contributions are appreciated, please do not continue this disruptive behavior. 2001:569:7F96:EE00:8997:5070:71C8:71D (talk) 21:46, 2 May 2022 (UTC) lk:Davidgoodheart#top|talk]]) 23:03, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

It wasn't for no reason as it is easier to go through and looks better if it is in alphabetical order. Please no more about this silly issue. Davidgoodheart (talk) 02:37, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

For most pages regarding biographies of living people, they are usually categorized first by their year of birth and the Category:Living people, and then the rest of the categories are placed in alphabetical order. Just a heads up. 2001:569:7F96:EE00:DC6D:D5D7:D244:DEA8 (talk) 03:01, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. [3][4] --Hipal (talk) 22:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Richardson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

... ... ... This any good, Davidgoodheart? Key.--Kieronoldham (talk) 20:33, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Haven't forgotten, Davidgoodheart. Rest assured. 24 hours max.--Kieronoldham (talk) 04:31, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

... --Kieronoldham (talk) 01:38, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Paul (given name)

added links pointing to Paul Smith and Paul Jones

List of people with given name Michael

added a link pointing to Michael Brown

Tammy Lynn Sytch

added a link pointing to Booker T

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

his brother was Attila Sallustro^[1] and if I remember well he was a footballer when he was young... --2.237.220.21 (talk) 12:12, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of people named David, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Brown and David Carroll.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of people with given name Michael, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Jones.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For your significant contributions over the years... Keep it going! Volten001 ☎ 09:44, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Thomas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.

For a year you have been adding citations to BitChute, which the Wikipedia article describes as "known for accommodating far-right individuals and conspiracy theorists, and for hosting hate speech". The links you are citing are copyright violations as they are unofficial uploads, which violates the WP:YTCOPYRIGHT policy.

Here are some examples of citations to BitChute you added to provide a citation when it is entirely unnecessary and unrelated to the text it is supposedly supporting:

• August 2021: Carly Rae Jepsen
• October 2021: Dallas (1978 TV series)
• February 2022 (possibly the worst): Ironic (song)
• May 2022: Hanson (band)
• Today, July 13, 2022: Octopus's Garden

and pretty much everything else at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&limit=20&offset=60&profile=default&search=insource%3A%22bitchute.com%22&ns0=1

If you want to cite audiovisual material then use Template:Cite AV media or other ones. Please undo your edits and remove this WP:REFSPAM and copyvio within a week or I will report this spam elsewhere. Thank you, Heartfox (talk) 21:50, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

@Heartfox: I just removed a lot of sources now and will finish up the rest later. Davidgoodheart (talk) 00:09, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

@Heartfox Thank you for addressing these problematic citations. That said, I would encourage a more restrained approach to the use of warning templates. It's best when raising an issue with an experienced editor to avoid templating and just drop a friendly note unless this has already been attempted. Beyond which, level IV warnings are reserved for egregious cases where there have been multiple attempts to communicate that have failed and or situations where circumstances are such that no reasonable person can assume anything other than bad faith editing. Which FTR I seriously doubt is the case here. In my experience it is best when raising concerns about problematic edits to always assume good faith until/unless commonsense makes that impossible. Thank you again for alerting Davidgoodheart to the above noted issues, which I am sure will be corrected expeditiously. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:48, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

I have no clue how the citation in Ironic (song) can be considered anything but bad faith. There is zero reason to provide a citation to the music video hosted on an "alt-tech video hosting service" to support the song's name in the lead. Sorry but I can't assume good faith with edits like that. In the examples above, all of the videos cited are posted on BitChute by the same account, which is also odd. Heartfox (talk) 01:37, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Poor judgement ≠ bad faith, and, unless I am missing something, this is the first instance of the issue being raised. All of which said, these citations are clearly inappropriate. Davidgoodheart, I advise you very strongly not to add any links to that webhost w/o extremely good reasons and any links you may have added should be removed. IMO the site should probably be deprecated given its rather dodgy reputation. And if you have any connection to the account there, then that really is something where you should know better. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:11, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

@Heartfox: OK, I will remove those links as I have been doing, just give me time as there are many that I must remove that will take awhile. Davidgoodheart (talk) 13:42, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

@Ad Orientem: OK, I will remove those links as I have been doing, just give me time as there are many that I must remove that will take awhile. Davidgoodheart (talk) 13:42, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you. -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:16, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of people named David

added links pointing to David Taylor, David Chu, David Shapiro and David Chiu

John (given name)

added a link pointing to John Smith

List of people with given name Michael

added a link pointing to Michael Parker

Paul (given name)

added a link pointing to Paul Davis

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marc (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marc Davis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of people named David, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Kaye.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of people named David

added a link pointing to David Smith

Paul (given name)

added a link pointing to Paul Maloney

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Added the entry as requested. Sorry, it slippped my mind. K. Kieronoldham (talk) 19:53, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Davidgoodheart,

Thank you for creating Death of Sonja Engelbrecth.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Likely fails WP:BLP1E. Tragic, but not sure of encyclopedic value.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Slywriter}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Slywriter (talk) 23:54, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! —⁠andrybak (talk) 23:50, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

@Andrybak: I will try to remember that for the future. Davidgoodheart (talk) 23:59, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of people named David, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Brooks.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello David 👋

I would like to request that this article page Disappearance of Jovelyn Galleno be filed under Category:Missing person cases in the Philippines if possible. Wazzup Carl 01:52, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

@Wazzup Carl: Done, you can add it to the List of people who disappeared as that would be a good idea. Davidgoodheart (talk) 02:03, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Duffy (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Duffy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I noticed that you edited the murder of Don Banfield page I created recently and was wondering if you could give me some advice. Yesterday an IP started vandalising the page/adding unreferenced content [5], [6], [7]. Then, they went on the talk page and added a long legal threat saying they were going to sue the writer of the article and that they were 'contacting my solicitors': [8]. I was just wondering what you think I should do in this situation? I read WP:No legal threats and it seems quite a serious matter. I doubt they will stop vandalising the article. Classic Middlesex (talk) 07:06, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

@Classic Middlesex: I am not an administrator, you will need to contact one to get information about this. Davidgoodheart (talk) 15:24, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Classic Middlesex Having a look Ad Orientem (talk) 15:32, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

IP already blocked. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:34, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

I've revdeled their edits as serious BLP vios. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:38, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello. How can I help add entries to disappeared lists? Gingerbreadhouse97 (talk) 14:59, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

@Gingerbreadhouse97: For starters, please add Tegan Lee Lane to the List of solved missing person cases. Davidgoodheart (talk) 18:27, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Already added the requested entry, Davidgoodheart.--Kieronoldham (talk) 22:00, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Sure, be happy to add entries from Monday onwards, Davidgoodheart.--Kieronoldham (talk) 01:07, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Wilson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for your edits to this article. However I'm confused by your addition of a "see also" referring to List of solved missing person cases. I had a scan through that list, but could see no reference to Dr. Stern. JH (talk page) 08:32, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

@Jhall1: He has now been added to the list. Davidgoodheart (talk) 17:26, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. I suppose technically he counts as having been a missing person, though it does seem to be stretching things a little. JH (talk page) 08:27, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2012 Bain murder-kidnappings

added a link pointing to Whiteville

Chris

added a link pointing to Chris Hogan

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kiana of Nishapur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iranians.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Special:Diff/1108375681/1111196019 Curious why you added, maybe you know something? All the article says is her cause of death is unknown. Maybe it was cancer or something.. - GreenC 21:28, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

@GreenC: I fixed it. Davidgoodheart (talk) 21:33, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Ah. Yeah that Mexico thing is a legitimate mystery how she died which I hope someday to discover I thought maybe you had some information from some other source she went missing in Mexico. Thanks for the update. -- GreenC 21:47, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Bell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

I don't think career developments can warrant time to devote to edits in the immediate meantime. I'll let you know when they can. Kieronoldham (talk) 06:07, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Sure. Starting tomorrow I'll be happy to. Wednesday may be a wee intermittent glitch, but otherwise, sure. --Kieronoldham (talk) 01:18, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Briggs.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

I assume you found your answer once you deleted your note on my Talk (I was offline), but that's the CfD if you didn't. Have a great day. Star Mississippi 15:31, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

@Star Mississippi: I think this was done secretly as I was not even informed that it was up for deletion and should of been as I created it. The person who nominated for deletion didn't even have an account. It shouldn't even of been nominated as it was kept after a previous afd as only one person wanted it deleted. And when it was appealed it says there is no restriction about re-creation. Flat out there was not call for it's deletion. Therefore I think that it should be restored and those who wanted it deleted told that they were in the wrong in deleting it. Davidgoodheart (talk) 20:44, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

You've brought it to DRV, which is the correct course of action. I'm not sure what you mean by the person who nominated it not having an account, it was nominated by @McPhail. I'm not sure why you weren't notified though. Star Mississippi 20:59, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

@Star Mississippi: I didn't see that McPhail nominated for deletion, my mistake. But like I said shouldn't articles and cfd that are closed as keep should be kept? Davidgoodheart (talk) 21:25, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

A 2018 no consensus (Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_April_12#Category:Professional_wrestling_jobbers) does not mean it can never be deleted. Factors change over the course of four years and editors who participated in this discussion and in the current DRV appear to believe it has. I didn't participate and know nothing of wrestling, so I take no position on the close. Star Mississippi 21:28, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

@Star Mississippi: There we two previous afds, the first one shown above was closed as a no consensus, then there was a SECOND afd that took place around two years later that was closed as a KEEP that User:Ad Orientem closed and that is why it should of been kept. Davidgoodheart (talk) 21:34, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Found it at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2020_July_24#Category:Professional_wrestling_. I'd missed it in the logs. But the same issues apply. Just because something was kept two years ago doesn't mean it will be kept now. It appears at DRV that folks agree with the close, so it's unlikely to change at this stage. Star Mississippi 00:33, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Please remember that consensus can change. It being closed as a keep doesn't mean it remains a keep forever. I've seen articles survive AfD more than 5 times only to eventually get deleted anyway. — Czello 07:25, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

I just want to add something else to this, too. Don't take it too personally when something you created gets deleted. I get it, it sucks because it's something you've worked on and you believe should exist. I've had articles I've worked on be deleted before, ones that I spent days writing by gathering sources for. But it comes with the territory of being on Wikipedia - you have to accept that occasionally the community might disagree with you and your work is deleted. The best thing you can do is keep that stiff upper lip and move onto the next article, otherwise we'll find ourselves abandoning our hard work on Wikipedia, and that doesn't help anyone. — Czello 08:41, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

While you're welcome to take it to ANI, @Davidgoodheart, I don't think you'll get the outcome you're looking for especially with the direction the DRV is going. @Czello's advice here is good. Suggest taking it to heart. Star Mississippi 15:43, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Or, at least, check the "minor edit" box for minor edits. Doing these things show courtesy and respect for fellow editors. - Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 16:06, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

British Lotus racing green... Kieronoldham (talk) 17:13, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Kavanagh.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

An article that you have been involved in editing—Murder of Sarah Payne—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 19:33, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of people with given name Michael, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Ross.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of people with given name Michael, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Michael Connor and Michael Connors.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of people with given name Michael, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Hamilton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

The TV people... Kieronoldham (talk) 19:25, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Steve, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve Sawyer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, can't go into details but something bad has happened in my family which is impacting my mood. Also (on the same day), a bot has found issues with 60+ of the maybe 140 images I have uploaded over the prv. 1 to 12 years (after all this time and what must have been millions of views, including scrutiny from others). Even though I agree with some of the rationales, I only have until 1 December to address them. Some might stay, but I doubt many will. I am only going to try and address the most pertinent half a dozen or so. Be ready to get back to normal soon. Rest assured. Kieronoldham (talk) 09:48, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Happy to recommence assisting you from tomorrow, if you wish, Davidgoodheart.--Kieronoldham (talk) 21:10, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Done. Hope yous like it. :) Kieronoldham (talk) 01:59, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who have earned the 100,000 edits award has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Sandstein 08:22, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Thomas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Kieronoldham (talk) 01:31, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Davidgoodheart! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
★Trekker (talk) 00:11, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

★Trekker (talk) 00:11, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:21, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Your Christmas message is missing the closing |} to the table, and thus any posts made after it are included in the table settings. I've fixed a few that I've seen, but you might want to a) check with everyone you left the message, and b) make sure either the template you used or the page you were copying from is fixed. Thanks! Primefac (talk) 17:38, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

This happens every year - christmas messages lacking a table-end or a closing </div>. Usually the cause is copypasting the code of a template, omitting the whole of a line that ends with <noinclude>. Usually, WP:SUBSTing the template avoids this problem. --Redrose64 🦌 (talk) 18:27, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2023!

Hello, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2023. Happy editing, --BabbaQ (talk) 23:33, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

• I have not been very active for about a week. A lot of Christmas related work :) Hope you had a great Christmas.BabbaQ (talk) 23:33, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

• Wishing you and yours a joyous feast. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:46, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
• Merry Christmas. I hope you have a great Christmas and New Year. scope_creep^Talk 10:05, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

BabbaQ (talk) 19:52, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:03, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 03:05, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Kieronoldham (talk) 01:17, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

All okay, Davidgoodheart? Be able to help again wi' the occasional edit if you wish. K. Kieronoldham (talk) 01:43, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scott (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scott Walker.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Done. Kieronoldham (talk) 14:56, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of The Transformers (TV series) characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stan Jones.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of people with given name Michael, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Lockwood.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

My friend. How are you these days? I took some time off Wikipedia. But I am back.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:47, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

@BabbaQ: Hi, my friend! Its great to hear from you again. I have a lot going on right now. I will let you know about in the next little while. Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:49, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of The Transformers (TV series) characters, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Smokescreen and Soundwave.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Rooney.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of people with given name Michael, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Martin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello Davidgoodheart. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Category:WWF/WWE King Crown's Champions/King of the Ring winners, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Only mainspace articles are eligible for A7. Thank you. BangJan1999 19:26, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, I'd actually forgottten about this request, Davidgoodheart. Will do within the hour. Got an FBI mention to add to the Beverly Potts article first. Kieronoldham (talk) 21:12, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

 Done, Davidgoodheart. Lo siento for the delay.--Kieronoldham (talk) 21:28, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Bailey.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scott (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scott Young.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

You appear to be slipping back into your old habits.

• Keep, as the article has 51 sources. here
• Keep, for all the great things he did that were very notable. here
• Keep, due to the good sourcing that this has. here

These are not helpful arguments at AfD. Please remember to base your input in policy. It's much more helpful to the closers. Star Mississippi 15:07, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Schmidt.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:28, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of people with given name Michael, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Diamond.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul (given name), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Paul Jenkins and Paul Lee.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Paul (given name)

added links pointing to Paul Wilson, Paul Wong and Paul Woods

John W. Hopkins

added a link pointing to Logger

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peter Kürten, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cornfield.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of The Transformers (TV series) characters, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mine and Wizard.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Do you think the article should be renamed Douglas Gretzler and Willie Steelman, Davidgoodheart? They were two equally active and culpable participants in this drug-fueled murder spree. Any idea where to specifically highlight the point? Nobody has replied to the comment I made on the article talk page nine months ago. Kieronoldham (talk) 06:16, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

@Kieronoldham: That seems OK to me. Davidgoodheart (talk) 15:07, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Keep up the good work! BabbaQ (talk) 10:05, 6 June 2023 (UTC)