Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominic Khoo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:29, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dominic Khoo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article on non-notable individual subject to a lot of undeclared COI editing. Lacking in-depth coverage in reliable secondary sources. Written in an extremely unencyclopedic tone throughout. Related to another spam article, The Watch Fund. Citobun (talk) 04:40, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:02, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:02, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:02, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I have looked through this article in detail. There is pretty much no claim that would put this above an A7. It reads like a puffed up personal interview. The intimidating list of references are personal press releases or interviews, broken links, and passing references none of which convey notability. No reason to keep this. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 03:30, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.