Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names

If you believe someone has chosen an inappropriate username under Wikipedia's username policy, you may list it here. However, before listing the user here, please consider contacting the user on his or her talk page and bring their attention to the problem and Wikipedia:Changing username.

When contacting the user, {{subst:UsernameConcern|reason for objection}} or {{subst:uncon|reason for objection}} may be helpful, but feel free to paraphrase it or write your own original text if you prefer. Please try to assume good faith and don't bite the newcomers, if possible: allow for the possibility of innocent error or other reasonable explanation.

Names that are offensive, inflammatory, impersonating an existing user, or asserting inappropriate authority will generally be permanently blocked by admins. Please also read Wikipedia:Username before reporting here. Grossly, blatantly, or obviously inappropriate usernames should be reported at WP:AIV instead.

Be aware that usernames are subject to specific criteria which differ from controls and guidelines regarding other forms of self-expression on Wikipedia. Please ensure you are familiar with the username policy before commenting on a username. This is not the place to discuss the behavior of a user unless it is directly related to their username.

Please inform all users reported here with {{subst:UsernameDiscussion}} or {{subst:und}}. If the RFC is closed as "Allow", please follow up by informing the user with {{subst:UsernameAllowed}} or {{subst:una}}. Admins who impose username blocks, please detail the specific reason with {{UsernameBlocked|reason for block}} or {{unb|reason for block}} (not just "Violates WP:U", please).

Navigation: Archives • Instructions for closing administrators • Purge page cache

This page is for bringing attention to usernames which may be in violation of Wikipedia's username policy. Before listing a username here, consider if it should be more appropriately reported elsewhere, or if it needs to be reported at all:

• Report blatantly inappropriate usernames, such as usernames that are obscene or inflammatory, to Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention.
• For other cases involving vandalism, personal attacks or other urgent issues, try Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents; blatant vandalism can also be reported at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, which is sometimes a better option.

Do NOT post here if:

• the user in question has made no recent edits.
• you wish to have the block of a user reviewed. Instead, discuss the block with the blocking administrator (see also Wikipedia:Blocking policy § Unblocking).

Before adding a name here you MUST ensure that the user in question:

• has been warned about their username (with e.g. {{subst:uw-username}}) and has been allowed time to address the concern on their user talk page.
• has disagreed with the concern, refused to change their username and/or continued to edit without replying to the warning.
• is not already blocked.

If, after having followed all the steps above, you still believe the username violates Wikipedia's username policy, you may list it here with an explanation of which part of the username policy you think has been violated. After posting, please alert the user of the discussion (with e.g. {{subst:UsernameDiscussion}}). You may also invite others who have expressed concern about the username to comment on the discussion by use of this template.

Add new requests below, using the syntax {{subst:rfcn1|username|2=reason ~~~~}}.

Tools: Special:ListUsers, Special:BlockList

---

Tools  : Special:Listusers, Special:Ipblocklist

If a discussion becomes lengthy, it may be moved to a subpage. See existing subpages.

This page has an archive.

New listings below this line, at the bottom, please. Add a new listing.

---

Does anyone know if Superbot (talk · contribs) is an authorized bot? If not (and it seems like it from the contribution history), this account should be blocked. Aecis^Brievenbus 00:09, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Disallow contributions indicate user is not a bot. -SpuriousQ (talk) 00:11, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Disallow references that imply bots are against WP:U RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 00:12, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Disallow -WP:U - no names of Wikipedia things if it's not that thing. --TeckWiz ^ParlateContribs_@ 00:15, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Disallow You have to BE a bot to be named a bot! --Xnuala 00:50, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Disallow Per above. Wikipedian27 02:33, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Absolutely clear Disallow - this one is specific in WP:U. Philippe Beaudette 02:38, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Disallow, but write a particularly kind note to the new editor, who probably had no reason to suspect this would be a problematic name. Newyorkbrad 02:39, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Disallow. I agree, we need to be sure to not have this editor feel that this disallowance = biting. --Kukini ^{hablame aqui} 03:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - I'm confused by this - don't we ALWAYS want editors to feel that way? What makes one user more deserving of that than any others? This isn't intended to be a "bite" to User:Kukini, whom I respect, but is intended to point out that I see this occassionally (and am indeed guilty of saying it) and someone asked me the same question. It kind of re-adjusted my thinking. Philippe Beaudette 04:28, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment, would this user be allowed to change his name at WP:CHU? BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, odometer) 04:24, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• User notified of impending block, block to be imposed at or after 04:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC). Please remove this discussion after blocking. Deiz [[User talk

Deiz|talk]] 04:20, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

• Disallow Name is trademarked software - look up "SuperBot" on Google. --sunstar net^talk 15:16, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent nonsense username. Wikipedian27 02:31, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Disallow for random characters in violation of WP:U - I googled it to be sure it wasn't a surname, doesn't appear to be. Allow - it's a name. Philippe Beaudette 02:40, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Allow I've encountered surnames that don't google (my own until recently!), and with a bit of practice I could probably pronounce this one too! How about asking the user?--Xnuala 02:56, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Disallow long non-distinct string of random characters violates Username Policy--William Thweatt ^Talk | ^Contribs 02:58, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Allow a random string of characters would not generally look like this. It's somewhat pronounceable and not objectionably long. -SpuriousQ (talk) 03:33, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Allow I think SpuriousQ may be right here. This does not appear random to me. --Kukini ^{hablame aqui} 03:58, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Allow It would seem that the users' name (or alias) is Vivek Vaibhaw Dwivedi.Proabivouac 04:47, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Allow: And here's Vaibhaw. After all the assurances I got on WT:U that people would never block long foreign names as "random", they could tell the difference (the examples I gave were Finnish, Maori, and Inuit) -- along comes a name from India, and here come the calls to "disallow as random". My head hurts from pounding against this wall, and the neighbors are starting to complain. Oh, please. -- Ben 06:10, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Should we file pre-emptive RFCs now on names like Einojuhani Rautavaara, Raimo Hämäläinen, and Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde; Parekura Horomia, Kōmihana Tirotiro Whanonga Pirihimana, and Te Āti Haunui-a-Pāpārangi; Simeonie Keenainak, Irene Avaalaaqiaq Tiktaalaaq, and Kenojuak Ashevak -- either as shown or withthenamesallruntogether? As far as I know, these people haven't logged in yet, but someday they might. -- Ben 06:47, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - Ben, always - ALWAYS stop banging your head before you hear the squishy sound, 'kay? Philippe Beaudette 06:15, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• It's more like a grinding sound. Some of the bricks and mortar are starting to give way. -- Ben 06:47, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Allow -- Vivek is a common Indian name. I can't speak for the remainder. - Longhair\^talk 10:23, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Random characters. Violation of WP:U. Wikipedian27 02:44, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Disallow for random characters in violation of WP:U. Why do people choose such strange usernames? Nol888_(Talk) 02:47, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Disallow Seemingly random characters. It looks like it might say something in leet, but even if it does it doesn't matter if no one can read it.--Dycedarg ж 02:52, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Changed to Allow. I'm annoyed I didn't see that. Anyway, once it's pointed out to you, the pattern is easy enough to spot. Although I'd like it if his signature was formatted in such a way as to make it more obvious.--Dycedarg ж 08:04, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Disallow Allow This one actually has a pattern, though. It's Phred (Fred) with 13 stuck in it. I did a quick search to see if that's the name of a banned user, and it doesn't seem to be. However, WP:U says apparently random sequences of letters and/or numbers, and this is certainly apparently random. Given the user's explanation, I'm inclined to allow it now. Philippe Beaudette 02:53, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Disallow long non-distinct string of (apparently) random characters violates Username Policy--William Thweatt ^Talk | ^Contribs 03:00, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Disallow Apparently random. --Kukini ^{hablame aqui} 03:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• User notified of impending block, block to be imposed at or after 04:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC). Please remove this discussion after blocking. Deiz talk 04:20, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Allow Thank you Phillippe; my username is indeed the letters of "Phred" (a pseudonym of mine) alternating with the digits of 13, my favorite number. I have used this username for some time on many sites (e.g. GM Inside News, Digital Corvettes, eBay, my blog) and I am rather attached to it. It would be sad as well as inconvenient to have to change it. Can I convince you to reconsider? --P1h3r1e3d13

I think the issue is that it's a hard username for other users to remember and use, and thus hard to reference in other posts, etc. The policy on WP:U deals with apparently random sequences of letters and/or numbers and to most people I think this one would be apparently random. However, let's let this run for a bit here and see what other people think. Thanks for coming here and letting us know what the username means and it's precedent. That makes the discussion much more productive! Philippe Beaudette 05:03, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you; I appreciate your consideration. Does this mean I can consider my block postponed and expect another message beforehand if I am to be blocked after all? --P1h3r1e3d13

No, I certainly don't have that ability. This page does, however, operate by consensus and consensus can change. Previously the consensus was disallow, because we didn't know the context and it appeared random. Now that there's explanation it's possible that the consensus can change. I would expect that you would be notified in the event of a block, but we'd need one of the Wikipedia administrators to make that call. Luckily, several of them watch this page. I'm curious to hear one of them chime in and shed some light on their thoughts. I (and most of the folks who contribute here) am just an editor that has interest in this subject and enjoys seeing the interesting names that come through. Philippe Beaudette 05:12, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Allow: Could as easily have been "Phred13", but we're not making aesthetic judgments here, and I don't see a WP:U violation. "Apparently random"? Please, it's no such thing. Strip the numbers, and it's "Phred", strip the letters and it's "13" thrice, simple patterns interleaved. Plus it's his pre-existing ID elsewhere, on multiple sites,, which makes it almost like his real name. -- Ben 05:47, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Added "Strong" -- Ben 06:15, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Allow It's obviously meaning Phred13, with the number 13 in between. It's easy to pronounce, and it can be considered leet. --w^{L<speak·check·chill>} 07:08, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Disallow but allow the user to change it to something like 13Phred13, something other editors could actually be expected to work with. As it is, it appears random, weither it is or not. I came up with a 30 character password recently, which is really not random at all, but if you looked at it, you'd barely know where to start -- feb^talk 07:25, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Allow. P1h3r1e3d13's explanation is fine with me. PeaceNT 08:27, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:U prohibits usernames that relate to editing processes. Wikipedian27 03:05, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Allow Many editors use "editor" as a generic part of their names. --Ginkgo100^talk 03:56, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Allow I don't see this one as "official" perse. Could not find a specific policy against "editor."--Kukini ^{hablame aqui} 03:57, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Allow - I don't think the editing process rule applies here - that's for "delete", "parse", etc - given that, this is a description of the, well, article editor. Philippe Beaudette 04:23, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Allow I don't think that is what the policy meant. ^HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 04:29, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Allow: Doesn't claim any authority above or beyond the ordinary run of Wikipedians, this being "the encyclopedia anyone can edit", after all. The user might as easily chosen "Person" or "Human Being" -- except those are already taken. Would I have been wrong to use "Template Tinkerer", had I wanted such a bland and impersonal name? Surely this is the opposite end of the scale from "offensive". -- Ben 05:32, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Allow: am I the only person seeing the irony in this nom? either way, no violation -- feb^talk
  • Yeah, bigtime.
• Allow - per Phillippe - I think the point is that newcomers don't try to click someone's name hoping to accomplish something.Proabivouac 06:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Allow No violation of WP:U. PeaceNT 08:30, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Allow and yes, I too see the irony. John Reaves (talk) 08:58, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Allow- No violation. --TeckWiz ^ParlateContribs_@ 16:05, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Allow What's wrong with it? ♥Tohru Honda13♥ 16:21, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is it really appropriate to pick the name of an ethnic group and then add "blood n veins" to it? It's like having "Arab blood n veins" as a username. Khoikhoi 05:03, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I believe he/she is saying he/she is proud to be Assyrian.Proabivouac
• Allow - I'm having a hard time finding a policy under which this would be unacceptable, except MAYBE it could be potentially viewed as offensive, but I don't think that a reasonable person would find it so. I think in this case we should let it go and keep an eye on contribs. That may shed some light on meaning. Philippe Beaudette 05:09, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Allow: What's "offensive" is to denounce or derogate others' ethnicity; it's not offensive to show pride in one's own. Remember the "Allow" on Theangryblackwoman (talk · contribs)? Why fuss about "Proud American" or "Bonny Scot" or other ethnic/national-pride names that don't tear anyone else down? At most it would become an issue in questions about COI edits or edit-wars, which haven't happened yet, may never happen, and if they do happen would be user-conduct concerns, not grist for RFC/NAME. -- Ben 05:40, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Allowper Ben. --w^{L<speak·check·chill>} 07:10, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Disallow - I'm sorry but their are different ways of stating of being proud of your ethnicity. With a username like that, he sounds like his ready to go to war then to construct educationaly. Chaldean 14:31, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Allow No rule against stating your ethnicity. Chaldeans assumptions are creative at best, I see no indication of any of that. ^HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 14:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moved again from AIV - Violation of WP:U (see WP:U#Inappropriate usernames Religious and hate names) John Reaves (talk) 08:40, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Disallow. This name could cause religious offence. Sam Blacketer 10:02, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Disallow per all. --w^{L<speak·check·chill>} 10:41, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment No problem with "God" in this context ("hate names"?) but possible intellectual property issue.[1]Proabivouac 11:58, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Disallow-Religious name. --TeckWiz ^ParlateContribs_@ 16:10, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Throughout HIstory Man Has Observed Society And Its Changes (talk · contribs) seems to have chosen a username which is way too long (and also has a capitalisation mistake). WP:U says that extremely lengthy usernames are inappropriate. Sam Blacketer 11:52, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Disallow Too long.Proabivouac 11:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Allow: (1) On "capitalisation mistake". In a book title, capitalizing the word "And", and the letter "I" in "HIstory", would be a mistake. In a name, the matter's not so clear-cut. In real-world names, words like "de" or "von" are generally given the case (upper or lower) and spacing that the named person prefers. I'd presume we extend the same courtesy here. (Though I was once told that if I'd CamelCapped my username as BenedictTheMoor I might have been blocked on sight as a likely Cplot sockpuppet.) If this actually was a mistake on the user's part, it's the user's embarrassment to bear, and I imagine we'll see a name change request going through soon enough. . . . (2) On "lengthy". It would be overlong for a nick to sign on talk pages. The user may sign with just the acronym "Thimhosaic" -- which would explain that capped "I" as making the acronym pronounceable. As a username, the phrase is certainly not hard to read, pronounce, or distinguish from other users, as one long random string among others might be. It's easier to remember than many much shorter names. When referring to this user in conversation, "Throughout..." would be sufficient to let others know whom you mean. -- Ben 13:44, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Just to comment, I'm not suggesting that he be blocked for having mistakenly capitalised the second letter of 'history', just that he may wish to change his name anyway. As far as lengthy, we recently had a debate on My foot is caught in the shoe washer (talk · contribs) which some people (not me) contended to be too long; that had 36 characters. This one has 59 characters. Sam Blacketer 13:53, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• And we ended up allowing Foot's name. But if you'd like to make your suggestion directly to Throughout, on the user talk page, I'd certainly encourage having that one-to-one discussion. -- Ben 15:02, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I think it's not right to simply look at the number of characters in a name. This username may have 59 characters, but it's a lot clearer than specimen User:Justaverylongname1212212112212112. What matters is the context of the name: can it be understood and reprocuded by other users without having to copypaste? I think that is the case here. Aecis^Brievenbus 14:15, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Disallow per comment by Aecis. No one would enter this name w/o copying and pasting it. And the mistakes in a long name make it even harder. --TeckWiz ^ParlateContribs_@ 16:13, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Disallow. Unacceptably long, arbitrary uppercase. PeaceNT 16:27, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Disallow - Too long. // DecaimientoPoético 16:33, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent random characters, perhaps even nonsense name. Wikipedian27 14:07, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Could this be a vowelless way to write Live Scorpion? Aecis^Brievenbus 14:12, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Or "Lives Creepin'", or "Loves Carpone" (a Christian martyr also known as Carpophorus), or an acronym of "Let Very Social Characters Revel Playing Numbers" -- having seen that the full phrase would likely get blocked as too "lengthy".... -- Ben 14:30, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• I see "Love scorpion" ^HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 14:56, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes, love not only bites, it stings. -- Ben 15:17, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Allow - Looks fine. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 15:25, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Allow-Just ask the user which word it really is, then we know, just take out the vowels of [word]. Pretty easy to remember. --TeckWiz ^ParlateContribs_@ 16:16, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why was he blocked. I saw him on the new user list with no contribs, then I saw he was blocked Why?Zbl 15:01, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He spent too much time reading Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names. -- Ben 15:07, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment my first impression is that this is a Can't sleep, clown will eat me impersonator. No opinion either way though. Aecis^Brievenbus 15:05, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• The words "can't" and "will" are trademarks? -- Ben 15:11, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Trademarks? What are you talking about? Where do trademarks enter into it? ^HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 15:29, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Those are the only two words the blocked username has in common with the other (pre-existing) username. Excess similarity is clearly not the issue. If all it takes to get blocked is a username of the form "Can't... will....", then the existing user must have a trademark on those words. ... What? You mean he doesn't? Then there's no reason to block those two words. -- Ben 15:42, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Much greater resemblance to "My foot is caught in the shoe washer" -- though I'd key off the word following "my", and call them "Foot" and "Shoe". I can tell the difference, most days. -- Ben 15:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Disallow for trolling whilst creating a username. Sam Blacketer 15:47, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm acutely uncomfortable with the accusation of "trolling whilst creating a username". We already have the rules against obscene, offensive, inflammatory, etc., and don't need "trolling" to cover those. As Wikipedia:Troll points out, "trolling" is a very subjective judgment, and has often been applied to the innocent. I'd prefer not to see it given as a reason to block, especially before someone's even made any edits. -- Ben 15:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• It is already a part of WP:U: "Usernames that give the impression that you intend to cause trouble" are listed as inappropriate. Sam Blacketer 16:12, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Disallow It's semi-variation on "Can't Sleep, Clown Will Eat Me." Plus, it's long. Acalamari 16:25, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Disallow - Clearly a can't sleep clown will eat me attack name. We get variations on this all the time. pschemp | talk 16:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reported to AIV as: "Username may be rude, inflammatory, unnecessarily long/confusing, too similar to an existing user, contains the name of an organization or website, or is otherwise inappropriate." I'd like more imput on this one. Metros232 15:01, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Allow, looks fine unless the person complaining would like to narrow down the criteria as to what's objectionable. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 15:26, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Boy, that reason sure covers the field! Let's see: it's not rude, it's not inflammatory, I don't think it's too long or confusing (on which my opinion will surprise no-one here or at WT:U), show me the existing username, might be an existing organization but has anyone looked it up?, and "otherwise inappropriate" is just too vague. "Looks like an organization name" might have been a clearer way to put it. Editors here are supposed to be individuals, not organizations. -- Ben 15:32, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Contact SunStar Net (talk · contribs) for clarification if necessary. He's the one who posted it to AIV with that reason. Metros232 15:38, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• And, wow, you know, "SunStar Net" looks like a website name....... -- Ben 16:02, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• http://www.sunstar.net -- Yes, indeedy!
  Once this was a website, though it's not there anymore;
  You may try to enter, but the "Closed" sign's on the door.
  Get there through the Archive, for now that's the only way
  to let the light of SunStar.Net still shine upon your day.   -- Ben 16:41, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• http://www.khea.info/sports.html tips the gaff: "Kentucky Home Education Association", so it really is an organization, with "homeschool sports" one of their areas of concern.

This was already blocked, as it is advertising the group and is a group account. Check the block log before posting please. pschemp | talk 16:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reported to AIV as "username..." I don't know if this is completely inappropriate. Could be a company name but could also be some sort of play on St. Elmo's Fire. Metros232 15:02, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Allow The name is fine. ^HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 15:05, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Allow It' fine. I don't see the problem. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 15:27, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

comment If the person reporting this name did not give a reason, then I don't see the need in repeating it here, without a reason. I will close this soon as no claim of a problem exists. ^HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 15:28, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Contact SunStar Net (talk · contribs) for more information. He reported it to AIV. Metros232 15:37, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Allow-No violation. --TeckWiz ^ParlateContribs_@ 16:18, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Allow It's all cool. ♥Tohru Honda13♥ 16:20, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Allow. Could refer to the gymnasium at St Elmo's School for Girls, the fictional school in "The Four Marys", a UK comic strip. We'd allow "Hogwarts Gym", wouldn't we? -- Ben 16:23, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense username. Wikipedian27 16:34, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]