User talk:Canadiansteve

A tag has been placed on File:ANAT Mainipulator arm.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 18:44, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Hybrid ANAT walker robot.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 18:45, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Mobile ANAT Robot.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 18:45, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• So put a notice on your website stating that the images are licensed under the Creative Commons. See this page for example. Two of the images on it have been uploaded (to the Commons of course, and no-one has queried them. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:47, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:07, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:ANATWalker.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 21:09, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:ANAT Manipulator arm.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 21:13, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to upload media files with false or lacking copyright and source information, as you did at File:ANAT Manipulator arm.jpeg, you may be blocked from editing. Please make sure you have read and understood our image use policy before making any further uploads. If you have questions, ask at the copyright question page. Please stop uploading images and claiming you own the copyright when you obviously don't. Eeekster (talk) 21:13, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I obviously do, buddy. Contact the company president of Robotics Design at ck@roboticsdesign.qc.ca, who is right here, and you will confirm that to yourself. See other images ive placed here, and you just might find an obvious precedent. If Robotics Design Inc. owns the copyright who is Robotics Design Inc.? I am, for all you need to know, so let me do as I please, and if you want to contact the company, go to contact us, and call us, or email.

It isn't up to me to confirm the copyright status and we don't know who you are or what your relationship with the company is. Therefore your claims of owning the copyrights aren't valid here and you'll have to deal with establishing your ownership if you want the images to not be deleted. Eeekster (talk) 21:20, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ive had to establish "ownership" or unlimited access to anything that has to do with the company before several times. How would you like me to do it this time?????

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robotics Design is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robotics Design until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Orange Mike | Talk 00:44, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've been told this three times, despite not doing it once. Your accusation is unfounded.

Hello. It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on others' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence Robotics Design. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. — CharlieEchoTango — 02:14, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed your request for help from the user talk pages where the users have not replied yet. It is ok to ask one or two users for help, but doing to 30 users can be considered canvassing. If you have any questions, I would be happy to help you. Best, Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 04:20, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Canadiansteve. You have new messages at CharlieEchoTango's talk page.
Message added 02:41, 6 November 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hello Canadiansteve. I've added my Keep request to two deletion discussions. I'm afraid that, once a deletion discussion is started on Wikipedia, a herd mentality develops and deletion becomes almost a foregone conclusion. It's an interesting sociological phenomenon, but it's very unfair, and I think Wikipedia ought to tackle it. Biscuittin (talk) 09:06, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re the AfD for RD Inc, calm down, let the process work through a bit. Yelling at everybody all the time raises hackles. Maybe stick to one post per day. Greglocock (talk) 04:04, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Let the process work through a bit" Does that mean let the deletion go ahead? Biscuittin (talk) 10:27, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see that ANAT Technology is a requested article at Wikipedia:Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences. If somebody other than you requested it, then that looks like an additional reason for keeping it. Biscuittin (talk) 21:26, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:30, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think we are making progress. I have asked on the deletion pages what changes need to be made to your articles to satisfy the critics. Biscuittin (talk) 14:30, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Canadiansteve - I've replied to you at User talk:Biscuittin. Biscuittin (talk) 14:52, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Haven't managed to save ANAT Technology. Hope we have better luck with Robotics Design. Biscuittin (talk) 01:39, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can read the decision at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ANAT Technology. Biscuittin (talk) 01:44, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think Robotics Design has been saved - see top line at Talk:Robotics Design Inc Biscuittin (talk) 16:05, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Robot may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• exposing workers to the hazardous and tight spaces such as in [[Duct (HVAC)|duct]] cleaning.<ref>{{cite news|url=on.fb.me/1o843oN |title=The Trouble with Regulation |publisher=National Air Duct

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:48, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Bixi (company) —has been proposed for merging with PBSC Urban Solutions. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Mindfrieze (talk) 22:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Zellers. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Meters (talk) 20:50, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Robots? Asteroid mining? Mafia? Sharks? Keep your ranting out of article talk pages. Meters (talk) 20:54, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1. Roboticsdesign.ca

2. Same, if you understand engineering

3. Read any of the articles on the Robert Moniz guy, that's what they talk about.

4. Your collapse of my comment was perfectly fine. That's what I was trying to sell him. Your ignorance on the topics do not make them any less real than if I said I was selling cherry soda pop. I shortened the conversation for you, you're welcome, and thank you for offering the option to shorten it even more. It's pretty that way. Canadiansteve (talk) 00:08, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

None of this has anything to do with the Zellers article. Read WP:NOTAFORUM and keep your bizarre ramblings out of Wikipedia. Meters (talk) 01:59, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your interest in my reason for editing the article should be referred to the same guide. Canadiansteve (talk) 02:48, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You literally deleted a message from the Moniz Zellers where he talked about some mafia looking things. I agree with deleting it and I understood and cared just about as much as when we spoke, but there, mafia sounding things. Canadiansteve (talk) 13:17, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Zellers, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 20:01, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can't get you to participate in the discussion where it doesn't involve telling others they can't participate in the discussion, but I can get these so very serious warnings when I put the results of it on the page. It's pathetically obvious you have a blatant conflict of interest here, and I could not begin to care. I know the pain in putting a company page up here, heck I'm learning from you. If you work with me to make the article something that isn't embarrassing our country, that would make me happy - the real reason I decided to get involved, and I will go back to my mountain and let everyone start shaking after their Justin Beiber faces and come back when it's over. Canadiansteve (talk) 13:01, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Zellers. You do not have consensus to remove this sourced content Meters (talk) 16:27, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And you accusing me of having a COI is pretty rich, considering that in 13 years your only interest in Wikipedia has been your Robotics Design Inc company, and now, after six years of inactivity, an attempt to add Moniz to the Zellers article because you "wanted to sell him robots" [1]. Please retract the claim that I have a conflict of interest here. I consider that a personal attack. Meters (talk) 16:47, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So there too, complete logical fallacy and off-point ad homenim attack to add to the list, my COI with a completely unrelated company that I didn't bother trying to hide, and the only relation is to explain how big of a waste of time this is, I'm much better off being busy for another 13 years. I like the Bay less when I talk to you. If I considered this to be worth anything whatsoever, I'd spend more than two or three minutes other than the big first block. I outlined plenty of reasons for me to be here, and you want to call that a personal attack? Repeat that if you want it, and then I will list one by one all the obvious evidence and similarly pathetic attacks and there can be a big vote over you, I didn't bring a single person to help with this because other than you making drama that is going to be there long after their little Zellers.

I can just go find the guy, get the Zellers name, give a license to a few dozen people per trade school/university and have them all join the debate. The total I gain from this conversation is $0 and it won't happen, but I can just go one by one and the edit history. I see the end of this, and you're shooting yourself in the foot by fighting me. I'm not that special and if your pop up's on top, next step will be the guy and the next step will be the criminal record and then you have the Zellers page talking about criminals on the top. Leave it at the bottom and fortify that position while you can, it's accurate and you just get a new charity made or a new tech installed in the place to get your article about the location up top with a positive story and his Zellers is obviously not going to have anything noteworthy and you win. Usually people pay me a lot for this, so there, now you can definitely not say I care anything about anyone involved in this, and will help and hurt anyone on a whim for what I see will hurt Canada. Not that I spent much effort there.

Again, stop making pointless drama here that won't work out and just go to the talk page on the article. I come on once a day, no discussion a consensus is assumed, especially if you're active on the page. The issues are very clear, and your attempts at confounding it are defeating the purpose. Now the Bay looks more sleazy.

Here's one I'm guessing isn't going to help you to answer: does Mr. Ollie have a conflict of interest? I'd much rather we continue this on the talk page and reach or don't reach consensuses, just like you didn't need to for the other edit that put the Moniz drama in there. Canadiansteve (talk) 08:09, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah gaslighting. The term for that is gaslighting. Canadiansteve (talk) 08:10, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 18:54, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You have also violated the policy on Biographical content about living people. Cullen328 (talk) 19:33, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Canadiansteve (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My edits were not disruptive, I spent a lot of time there. It was obvious the editors there had a major COI, and so I threatened to open a Zellers strip club, which I previously showed would be funny to anyone not involved, and they said it was a threat. I said that because me saying I would bring other editors there was seen as a threat, a useful thing, and they claimed I was threatening them, which only makes sense if they have a personal connection to the company. The rest of what I wrote is obviously connected to deciding what should be said about a worldwide situation. Also no one else here talked to the guy and went to the stores. If the editors would be asking me and participating to understand rather than declaring that everything must stop, I could do something. Also the Moniz family bought the trademarks for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumers_Distributing and I can help in other things about this as well. I have very little interesting in adding that here because it's not that funny, if it helps him or not to write that he's buying everyone's names is an interesting question.

Go ask anyone that doesn't work for HBC if me threatening to open a Zellers strip club (not that I ever would open any) would be a threat to them or just a off-topic part of the conversation. If either editor had answered any of the problems I made in my post, there would be no drama in the first place, just a discussion on where the new pop-up Zellers and Moniz Zellers unfinished legal drama belongs on a mid-importance page. I would also much prefer someone else just goes and edits the facts in and could care less what happens to this account, but good on all you working hard here

Also it says the Moniz and the account he made are my sock puppets? No they're not. He made an account on his laptop at my place because I told him to, but I have had my account there for years and have no access to his or whatever email he signed up with. That's just nonsense. Technically the only reason those accounts exist is I said do it yourself, but I wasn't the one writing there beyond saying "say thank you very much" when you're mad. I saw what they did and I agreed it wasn't accurate. Also he was going to go to a university to ask someone and I felt bad. Anyways do whatever you do and you can prove I have no access to that account and anything on it was the Moniz guy doing it, and I do not want to start having anything to do with the account, sneaking patents is criminal. Kind of adds to how funny this story is for banning me for wanting to write about it. Totally worth it for the laugh either way thanks guys. Also anyone can come to my house and I will give them a foot or back massage if they are not vaxxed, I get paid for exercise and I sell them robots because only rich people can afford massages. Usually.Canadiansteve (talk) 02:12, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What you describe with the other accounts is called meat puppetry. We don't know if you are sitting behind the computer or not. You don't really address your violations of policy. I don't think you will be unblocked to further edit about the dispute you seem to be in, perhaps you should concentrate on resolving that first instead of Wikipedia editing. 331dot (talk) 07:23, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

"Do not recruit your friends, family members, or communities of people who agree with you for the purpose of coming to Wikipedia and supporting your side of a debate." - Description of meat puppetry

In what way, shape or form could this possibly be my side? I did not recruit anyone, the guy asked me to do it and I said no. When you guys told him he couldn't edit I agreed to do it, but I'm not on anyone's side, he's a clearly criminal, and I thought it was a bank. The Bay I like, but I don't have a COI for anyone, I did my best to make it very clear that I have no interest in anyone in the conversation, and there is no possibility of them comprehening my interests without years of experience or engineering degrees.

The guy mostly wanted the little side bar to say is a department store instead of was, and I am not someone that can be bribed, I see logical reasons why that is wrong and will not support it. Same with the HBC lawyer-editors, when they made logical points I agreed. The only other page here I did anything for was a clear COI I didn't try to hide, and I really was enjoying the experience to have no skin on either side of the game and just enjoy the semantics debates. If you read over the things I was asking to be discussed, none are particularily one side or another, and if you want a COI, I care less about the article accuracy, the HBC or the Moniz Zellers than I care about embarasment to Canada. If latest news goes up top, then the drama belongs there technically, but it makes the country have more drama and therefore all the info can be put completely accurately in the little bottom section. To believe I am being recruited to do that makes me look bad, that's what you would pay for someone to say about you?

All the sleazy corporations and the sneaky criminals can have an iced tea. When they have funny drama like this, a little section in the middle of a page works. Is there anything wrong with any of that?Canadiansteve (talk) 14:29, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.