User talk:Joelr31/Archive5

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Joelr31. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

We've got few like this on the horizon and I'm not sure how to approach it. Do we default keep them? Marskell 16:59, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

But how long is too long? At some point, for the sake of a dynamic, not over-long page, we're going to have to close things. For instance, Dawson Creek has been up 20 days in FARC. Marskell 15:00, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

I posted a lengthy thread on the talk page. Any feedback you have is most welcome. Marskell 21:08, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

You took the protection off of the Watchmen main article, which is the 3rd time it has been unprotected in the last 4 hours ... did you even look at the history? It has been completely blanked several times by anonymous users in the past 12 hours alone! Maybe you have the time to keep repairing it, but I for one can no longer contribute to the upkeep of this page. --Dennette 20:14, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Don't leave threatening messages on my userpage again or I shall report you. I hope I have made myself clear. Thank you.BjF 18:25, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

I know about the warning, but I'm afraid I did not make any further revert to the country article. The matter with the list of largest building is not related to the country article. — Instantnood 21:23, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

They are related only in the way that user:Huaiwei is involved, and there's no 3RR violation with my edits, but user:Huaiwei's [1]. — Instantnood 21:34, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Guess you're talking about the country article. If you do actually look into my edits [2], you can tell they're not revert warring. — Instantnood 18:07, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

My edits to the country article were not even revert. Don't think they can be borderline. The edit with the list of largest buildings that you mentioned is hardly " petty syntax " as you've said. It is related to the political status of an entity, which is an important issue for an encyclopædia. Would Guam, Puerto Rico be presented as "Guam, United States" and "Puerto Rico, United States"? Would Åland be "Åland, Finland", and Greenland be "Greenland, Denmark"? — Instantnood 18:39, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for the warning. Please also see Category:University stubs. I will go outright and list all revert warring articles as they appear, instead of pretending all is all nice and cosy, or to claim that I am all innocent and the full fault lies only in the other party concerned. The arbom didnt go through all that trouble for nothing. And the last thing I would do is to try to include my factual arguments in the talkpage of an administrator who is merely attempting to stop the bad wikibehavior. I do not think instantnood dosent know the arbcom considers facts and behavior as seperate issues when dealing with such misbehavior.--Huaiwei 03:56, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

• I would like to draw your attention to the Royal Assent article as well. Thank you!--Huaiwei 11:55, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
• Also note Districts of Hong Kong.--Huaiwei 13:42, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Hello, I notice that you blocked user 205.188.116.5 (talk · contribs) for inflammatory edit summaries. IP 205.188.116.131 (talk · contribs) has been doing the same thing tonight. Thanks for keeping an eye out! InvictaHOG 03:23, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi! I was adding some species to the North American list and thought you may want to know about the Zenaida Dove/Key West Quail-Dove I added. I'm slowly working my way through National Geographic and filling in missing species. Thought you may want to know.......... pmeleski

Sorry about the count. I didn't really think about the ToC being messed up. Probably wasn't a good idea anyways.... If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka Talk to me! 03:14, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

I actually hate the ref after puncuation thing, but knowing it would be a problem I tried to make sure they all came after the full stop when editing today. I may have missed some, which I'll look for tomorrow. I'm quite happy with jaguar :). It's always been my favourite cat.

FAR continues along. I'd like more comments as always, but the page is still fairly active. Cambodia has been kicking around quite a while. It's quite close to standard, and I think I'll just make the last few changes myself. I'll keep you informed. Cheers, Marskell 21:18, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Oh, and Bob Dylan: there is no consensus at the moment and I think it should go keep. We haven't had one yet that is a true "no decision = keep" so I wanted to make sure we're on the same page. Marskell 21:22, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

I have just sent you an email on this. I am afraid I have been telling nothing but the simple truth all along, except I had no idea of her identity (and personal agenda with me) until yesterday.

You must do what you have to do, but so must I, morally, apart from anything else, and if you persist in trying to force me to enable this individual that I have observed to exhibit classic abusive and controlling behaviors on Wikipedia and I now know with certainty to be one of the truly most abusive people I have ever encountered I shall take the matter straight to Jim Wales himself. --Zeraeph 22:59, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Zeraeph has again brought her vendetta to the Asperger Talk and has linked the dicussion to the Administrative NoticeBoard's discussion about her behavior. 152.163.100.133 00:24, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

I am curious...how does a random AOL user happen to "just incidentally" notice this? --Zeraeph 01:10, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

If you wish to rephrase your warning to refrain from any suggestion of attribution of identity to a cyberstalker i have not chosen to identify in accord with protocol it will not be deleted. --Zeraeph 01:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

I thought someone threatened Z with being blocked for ignoring repeated admin User:Joelr31mulitiple administrative directives concerning undeleting on Talk:Asperger and an admin User:Joelr31 directive concerning deleting an administrative warnings from her talk page. She continues to flaunt your authority. You are no one when it comes to what seems an active delusional state. Just my impression. Someone issued a warning to her some hours ago about her being blocked if she persisted. What happened to that person? 205.188.117.70 02:21, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Whoops there goes YET ANOTHER AOL Web Proxy Server [3]. In real terms, HOW LIKELY is it that random AOL users come across this issue and decide to comment upon it? PLEASE open your eyes Joel, she is just making fun of you. --Zeraeph 02:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

LMAO. I rather think that your refusing to care about what Joel has been telling you so many times already suggests that it is you who are making fun of Joelr31. Was it Joel who gave her the warning? I am Kiwi 02:43, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

And A "SINGLE TOPIC" poster who has never posted on any other issue [4]. --Zeraeph 02:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

How are you, mi pana? I noticed that the "Did you know?" section is no longer being posted in the article. So, what are we going tod o with the Did you knows? It is a very interesting section which should be posted somewhere visible, don't you agree. Maybe, we should place links to it in some other pages, such as in the "List of Puerto Ricans" and such. Tony the Marine 02:01, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

I will have to fail this nomination since it has not gathered the required support votes yet and the nomination has been extended long enough. Since this is a very good list, I encourage you to submit it again in a couple days. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ 10:56, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi, on the Jimmy Smith page, you changed electric to electronic. I know that the definitions of electronic do vary, and in some cases it is used fairly interchangeably with "electric". However, in a musical instrument context, electronic is often a synonym for "digital"-- e.g. involving integrated circuits. An electric guitar is thus described as an "electric" instrument, because it has simple electric workings: potentiometers, magnetic pickups, etc. On the other hand, a CASIO keyboard, with its integrated circuits and computer chips can be described as an "electronic instrument". The early Hammonds, with their electric motor-driven spinning tonewheels and magnetic pickups can arguably be described as an electric instrument, or an electro-mechanical instrument (a reference to the spinning tonewheels); this helps to make the distinction between a 1940-era Hammond "electric organ" and a 1980 CASIO electronic organ.Just some ideas: )NatMor 20:14, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi Joel, Thanks for your response. THere has been a similar discussion over this issue on the Hammond Organ article, and in that case, what people did was put the formatting as [ [electronic organ|electric organ] ] (I put a space on the ['s so that it won't disappear), so that "newbie"s to Hammond organs wouldn't mistakenly think that the 1940s Hammond had Integrated Circuits! : ) NatMor 13:32, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi Joel, What is a FARC in the Wiki-context?NatMor 20:17, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

My first barnstar! I'm elated to finally have finished that wretched article also. Sabine's Sunbird talk 17:19, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Hello Joelito, I have been working for a couple weeks now around the Puerto Rico Sections. I am considered by many as a very knowledgeable person in this area and recently consulted with PBS on the making of "Visions of Puerto Rico" if you happened to see it. I am working now with Wikimedia the parent of Wikipedia on this project, but there is an issue on the copyrights. I have sent Wikimedia a special licence to allow me to copy sections of our 42 websites to the Wikipedia. But until that goes thru my instructions from them to get things going are just point links for now so I can get my thoughts organized. Oh also we are a Public non prifit corporation registered in Puerto Rico so calling it as "links to your own private websites" is not accurate either. Now since I assume you just went on a deletion spree, are you going to fix it all or am I writing to Wikimedia explaining why I have made no progress and who is at fault? As Wikimedia can trace it.--Dolphingvp 20:14, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Look forget it. I do not need this kind of harassment. I will be writing to Wikimedia and explaining it to them. You can explain it to them yourself. They can get someone else. As I said we were doing linking to form notes as we were going to replace all those with Wikipedia pages as soon as they posted the appropriate copyright info. I will be on the Island in a few weeks for meetings. I think I'll mention it around there is a punk kid who think he knows it all at Wikipedia.--Dolphingvp 21:20, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

I quit I am sending a note to Wikimedia resigning like I said. I will not be harassed. Not cut this out, Jut delete this and let it go. I will not post anything else here, Wikimedia can do what they want. --Dolphingvp 21:33, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Why did you list the request to move Ipod to the ipod as no consensus where it was 16-0 against the move. That is an obverwhelming consensus. I think that should be changed. --My old username 01:07, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

The other guy kept doing it to me, too, when I feel that the articles ARE important. Tell him to knock it off.

Hi,

This guy, user:Hahahihihoho, has been vandalising wikipedia for months. Just look at his talk page. He behaves like mentaly chalenged, so noone wants to block him forever, but I think we should.

This time, he vandalized Balkans article again. For some reason, he keeps deleting parts of the text related to refusal to some SE-european country to be considered part of the Balkans because it has pejorative meaning.

Please, help us get rid of this creature. --Ante Perkovic 01:06, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Joelr:

Dont listen to him. I write sources when I edit like I did on the Balkans. And Croats DONT FORM Majority in Mostar Mr Einsten Perkovic.

I hope you can look on justice joelr and see that I have right in taking away stuffs that is not true. Hahahihihoho 01:19, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Joel, Thanks for your cleanup on Caguas. I will make a note and not add "Education", unless/until I find something on education. Unless of course you or someone else enters the information first.

By the way.... where did "Joelito" come from? (The name/nickname, that is...)

Wow Joel, thanks for letting me know. I feel so humble. I wasn't expecting something like that. It feels good, though.

Anyway, I also want to share with you an e-mail that I received from El Senado de Puerto Rico, after I wrote to them and suggested that the names of Capts. Manuel Rivera and Humbert Roque Versace be placed in "El Monumento de la Recordacion" in San Juan:

September 8, 2006

Mr. Tony Santiago:

President McClintock has referred your suggestion to me so that we can initiate the research process that precedes inclusion in the Memorial during our Memorial Day 2007 annual event honoring our heroes.

We'll keep you updated and, if included, could use your help in getting close family addresses so that President McClintock can invite them, as well as you, to the unveiling ceremony.

Thanks for your assistance and everything you do to keep the world informed about Puerto Rico in Wikipedia.

Freddy Vélez-García

Secretario de Administración

Senado de Puerto Rico

Tu Amigo, Tony the Marine 01:38, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Please do ont erase my editing on the T-Rex article(You erased the 'rex') I find it extremely offensive.

Hi, I noticed you recently removed a vadalism comment from the US talk page. While I agree with the removal of that comment I also noticed that you speak Spanish from your user page. So do you know what "ME PONENE DE RE YANKEES?" means. I know its just a stupid vandalism comment but I am just really curious what that means. I haven't been able to found any translation, except for ponene which comes from poner? Anyway if you have a moment to spare-do you know what that phrase means? Is it just nonsense, as I thought? Thanks. Regards, Signature^brendel 01:32, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Your article is side by side with Paris Hilton on the Wall Street Journal online! Check it out! Sabine's Sunbird talk 02:06, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

For the note re Jaguar. Let me know when Fauna of Puerto Rico is on the FAC.

I must say that I'm quite happy having engaged with the FA process. I've been here 18 mos, and for a while I was wondering if it was worth it, as I was putzing about talk pages having stupid debates with who knows who. The FAs (creating my own and looking at others) have convinced me the place is worthwhile. Marskell 19:47, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

It's mentioned in the lead paragraph no less! It must have been a truly exceptional moment to notice that article referenced in WSJ. If you were a less modest Wikipedian, you'd no doubt start a page entitled Wikipedia:Pages created by Joel31 mentioned in the Wall Street Journal. Actually, I think that's one of our failings—Wikipedia talks about itself too much. So better to keep it to yourself as a compliment and an incentive to keep editing; the best I've got is a word from Jill Tarter calling Planetary habitability "interesting" (in an e-mail forward). Hey, that's not bad :).

I'm actually thinking I may look at the stable versions thing more (I know little about it). I do spend hours here—is it worth it, knowing that Jaguar (or Elfin-woods Warbler) could be denigrated by kids who only care about whether the cat (or bird) could beat a croc in a wrestling match? Not that there's anything wrong with kids editing (teenagers do loads of good work here) but I've often felt, with my own pages and looking at others, that the problem with the detoriation of pages is the "that's so cool!" problem; people (kids or the kid inside adults) will add a "this is so cool!" sentence but half of them will be memes that are actually inaccurate and the page will decline.

Anyhow, I'm rambling. I'll see you on my watchlist :). Marskell 20:38, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi, I'm pretty useless when it comes to copyediting - but I will look for anything glaringly obvious. Tony might have time to help, and Wayward does a good copyedit too.--Peta 23:50, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

One other thing, you should write up fair use rationales for fair use images. I've also found that there are quite a few nature photographers on flickr who use wikipedia appropriate creative commons licences, so you might get lucky there, just do an advanced search for cc licenced photos that can be modified and used commercially.--Peta 23:55, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Epa, Joelito, I have a full day tomorrow, but I can look at it over the weekend. I am NOT a good copyeditor either (Tony's the best), but I can at least attempt a first pass. I'll do what I can this weekend. Congrats on the WSJ article :-) Sandy 00:48, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

OK, I did what I could, but I'm not a great ce. I thought it was in pretty good shape, but there were some things (terms, etc.) I wasn't familiar with, so I didn't know how to proceed. I may have introduced an error (in the ma - does that include ago?), so please double check. I'm wondering if it's possible to wiki more of the terms and definitions, since I didn't know a lot of the terminology. My own preference would be for more commas and dashes, but I don't know if that's just a preference or grammatically correct, so I didn't include them. Maybe after you address the in-line questions (from Peta?), you can ask Tony to have a look next, since he's the best ? Best of luck with it! Sandy 02:20, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Murderous is good, and my sense is that Tony doesn't mind when he's asked in advance, and has time. :-) I asked Tony to ce my article: he must be swamped. Your English is SUPERB: certainly far better than my written Spanish, and better than most of the native Spanish-speakers in my household! I think the article is well on its way. Suerte! Sandy 03:21, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Hello Joel,

My name is Joel as well (tocallo). I never thanked you for cleaning up the Utuado page after I expanded it from a stub a few months ago. I've been a fan of Wikipedia for some time now and that was my first time adding to a page. My passion for Utuado started a few years ago while researching my family's history and genealogy. Long story short, last October I bought a vacation home in Utuado and it has become my permanent home since then. I love this island. Anyway, the reason for my comment is this, what the heck is going on with the Puerto Rico pages?? User 192.203.40.2 is ruining the pages. The Utuado page looks cluttered and messy. There is so much on there now that is unnecessary and/or redundant. His/her work is sloppy.... gosh, I hate the lists! I know there is only so much you can do, but I just wanted to vent. Thanks. Jbermudez 19:48, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply to my comment Joel and thanks again for all your time and dedication to the Puerto Rico content in Wikipedia, it's really all outstanding.Jbermudez 21:10, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Whatever man. Just cause you're an estadista with issues doesn't mean your about shit. POV my ass. I'll get other folks to deal with this later. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.107.71.14 (talk • contribs)

Why did you change it back from Isabel to Isabella? From Quaker24

You are actually wrong, her name in English is Elizabeth. Isabella is Italian. Isabel is Spanish, why not use the Spanish version, since that is the most acceptable version since the true English version is not acceptable, and it is an English article not an Italian one, why not just stick to the original form of her name, Isabel? Quaker24.

Hello, Joel. I apologize if I reverted your edit as vandalism, but I have to stand by the reversion. I initially assumed it was vandalism because "come" appeared to be a typo of "cum", as a vulgar reference to one way of collecting DNA. That, combined with the unnececessity of that word in that location, makes the change read as vandalism. May I ask why you want to place it there? – ClockworkSoul 13:57, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

• That seems like a significant improvement to me. :) Cheers! – ClockworkSoul 14:06, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Joel, my understanding is that adding the NPOV tag to a section is an entirely appropriate way of beginning a discussion on the issue, especially since NPOV violation is such a serious problem. Since you seem to disagree strongly, out of courtesy I'll wait awhile before adding the tag again to see if there is a response to my comment on the talk page. I hope you'll show me the same courtesy by not immediately reverting my edit a 3rd time. Best, Gnixon 17:03, 19 September 2006 (UTC).

Hi Joel,

Just wanted to say thanks so much for heliping out on the Bongo (antelope) article I'm working on. I'm new to this so please help out as much as you can!

Thanks so much again,

Black Stripe 20:19, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

I have a question about Keily Williams, was she a playmate for playboy or was that her sister? from Quaker24

I remember having to switch Z. portoricensis to Z. pumila in all my notes halfway through writing my dissertation. It had been one of the easiest endemics to identify, so it was a shame to lose it (unlike, say Argythamnia stahlii, which I couldn't distinguish in the field from its non-endemic congener). Guettarda 13:36, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Hmm...I may be wrong. The authors of this worldwide list of cycads considers Z. portoricensis a valid species. Guettarda 13:46, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Are you still at RUM? You might want to pay Gary Breckon a visit - he should know one way or the other, and may have a list of endemics that he might be willing to share. Guettarda 13:50, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Joelito, do you have any idea on this? Sandy 16:47, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks so much for keeping an eye on those articles, but did you actually read what are my edits to them? Are those edits warring, particularly for the latter two you mentioned? I'd deeply appreciate if you can actually step in to help bringing them out of the troubles. Thanks in advance. — Instantnood 19:03, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

That's indeed a problem. The troubles can't be actually addressed without the participation of sysops who're familiar with the subject. There have been sysops stepping in and taking actions, disregarding what's actually going on, and were not helpful at all. And those who're familiar don't want to deal with it. — Instantnood 19:43, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi, you left me an generic warning for edit warring. Please note that the majority of my edits today have been removing articles from categories and stubs that have been deleted by the community, or removing unsourced information added by Instantnood. If you've got a specific beef with any edits, please ask me directly. I'll either refrain or explain. In the meantime, I'll standby that unsourced information and removal of community deleted material is in line with the best concern of the project. thx. SchmuckyTheCat 23:40, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

User:Snle keeps deleting verifiable content that I have added to Shenyang, Dalian and Northeast China, and as you can see at the talk pages, he refuses to engage in any kind of serious discussion on the topic. There are ample precedents for having multiple language names of cities on Wikipedia. Please advice.--Niohe 19:35, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Stop removing information from Music of Bosnia page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Redcardiff (talk • contribs)

Hi, Joelito, and thanks for your comments in my recent request for adminship, which succeeded with a final tally of 70/4/4. I hope I can live up to your expectations, and if there's ever anything you need, you know where to find me! --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 00:16, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Joel—Frantically busy at the moment with real-world editing, but I'll try. Tony 01:07, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

I would like to reguest your opinion in the following issue :Talk:Puerto Rican women in the military

Thank you, Tony the Marine 21:24, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

I know you're still looking for copy editing, but I think you should trust the page is good and just go for the FAC. Really, the copy seems fine and the FAC period will allow for tweaking. As suggested, I would just alter the "Ortoiroid" sentence at the beginning of human impact so it doesn't come out of nowhere. Marskell 22:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Can you please restore my article that you intiated the deletion of? Please also specify exactly why (without referencing Wikepedia webpages) you deleted the article in the first place. Since your deletion, it was revised, at the suggestion of another administrator, to include a sentence on why the subject was important. I would very much appreciate if you restored the article, with the revisions, immediately.

Hey, sorry about changing the flag. Obviously my mistake... I thought I was on the Puerto Rico article. UserDeleted092906

Hey Joel,

The anthem of San Juan "En Mi Viejo San Juan" is the most recognizable anthem by Puerto Ricans on the island and Puerto Ricans worldwide. Of all the anthems of the municipalities, this anthem is dearest of all. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and as should be treated as such. What may be or not be important to you may have importance to someone else. There is no freedom of written expression if you are the only one who decides what others can read or cannot read.

Of all the Anthem of the municipalities, "En Mi Viejo San Juan" is the one anthem that children are taught and is sung in schools in the mainland. This being Hispanic Heritage Month was not the time to state that the San Juan "Anthem is definitely not needed" This is an insult to all Puerto Rican on the island and abroad.

You have no idea what this anthem means to a lot of people, especially those that left the island many years ago searching for a better life hoping one day to return. No Respect.

That said....

I understand where you are coming from.... You must understand that this is an encyclopedia. For many on the mainland this is one of only a few place on the web you can find good information about Puerto Rico.

The libraries in the states have limited information and the information (books) is 40 - 50 years old. I learned new things about Puerto Rico while working on the pages.

Most pages had limited information. Example: Villalba is a municipality of Puerto Rico.

No more. Thats it. All I knew about most of the municipalities is that they are a municipality of Puerto Rico. Maybe a dozen had useful information.

I have added information to more than 50 of the municipalities. I know that I have created list. These lists are good starting points where people, including you can expand on.

Example: you decide to remove these sections, which had links to other pages on the portal and also places in which new articles or description could have been added. There are people who actually do not know these places exists and why.

Go ahead; tell me about Capilla del Cristo. Why it was erected on this spot. The miracle that happened here. Hint: Horse and rider. Its importance. Why the gates are closed and when do they open. Tell me about the three different festivals in June. Without a list you would not have known there were three festivals in June. Why celebrate? These are subjects that can be expanded upon. These lists help.

• Capilla del Cristo (Cristo Chapel)
• Casa Blanca
• Centro de Bellas Artes (Fine Arts Center)
• Club Gallistico San Juan
• Condado Lagoon
• Convento de los Dominicos (Dominican Convent)
• El Cañuelo
• Fort San Felipe del Morro (El Morro)
• Fort San Jerónimo
• El Capitolio (White House)
• Old San Juan
• Pablo Casals Museum
• Parque de las Palomas - Palomas Park
• Fort San Cristóbal
• Santa Catalina Palace ( La Fortaleza )
• Muñoz Rivera Park
• San Juan Cathedral
• San Juan Museum of Art & History
• Town Hall

• Internacional Folk Festival - January
• Musical Theater Festival - January
• Calle San Sebastián Festival - Febraury
• Puerto Rican Theater Festival - March
• Puerto Rican Music Fiesta - May
• National Trovador Contest - May
• Patron San Juan Bautista Celebrations - June
• Festival de Verano - June
• Casals Festival - June
• Ceramic Festival - September
• Nacional Cuatro Competition - December

Respect other's opinions.

Are you an engineer that works without blueprints? Revisions... Revisions.... Revisions.

Perhaps this site should be call; Wikipedia the Free Semi-Encyclopedia.

I see you removed the review, which makes sense until at least four days from now, when it won't be mentioned on the mainpage at all. But maybe leave a note at User talk:Descendall so he doesn't feel put-off? Marskell 17:17, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

MagicKirin`ANSWER MagicKirin 20:03, 28 September 2006 (UTC) I saw that you deleted my edit. Please refrain from deleting accurate information. MagicKirin