User talk:Pinecone23

Hello, Pinecone23! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:42, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Islena Rey Rodríguez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Islena Rey Rodríguez, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bradv 02:30, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pinecone23! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bradv 02:30, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:15, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Blood on Snow, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:14, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Winged Blades of Godric was:

The previous decline reason still holds.We don't need puffery. Instead, add reliable secondary source(s) that have covered her non-trivially.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Islena Rey Rodríguez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Islena Rey Rodríguez, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

∯WBG^converse 04:22, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The only current source is goodreads, but the notability criteria for books requires more - at least a few professional journalistic or academic reviews published in mainstream news or academic sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blood on Snow and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Blood on Snow, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:38, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, White Man's Burden (album), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Whispering^(t) 13:46, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Riksby.

A New Page Patroller Meatsgains just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 03:04, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pinecone23,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating The Glaucus Block! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains}} and it's nice to meet you:-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 23:33, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Meatsgains: Nice to meet you too! As mentioned on the articles talk page, the information in The Glaucus Block comes from the Swedish article sv:Kvarteret Glaucus. Is this enough, or should I add other sources as well? Pinecone23 (talk) 18:53, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that works. I would suggest providing more sources as well if possible. Meatsgains^(talk) 17:15, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Nature area (Sweden), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Britishfinance (talk) 02:07, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Mjölkö.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The provided sources do not mention Mjölkö, although one of them appears to merely be a dead link. At any rate, the Swedish-language article has plenty more sources that can be used.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:10, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Street lighting in Stockholm, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:06, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CASSIOPEIA: Hello and thank you for reviewing the article! I have a query: since it's a translated article (as mentioned in the article's talk page), most of the sources come from the corresponding Swedish page. Why doesn't this count as "enough sources and citations"? Pinecone23 (talk) 10:27, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pinecone23, Greetings and thank you for the question above. All Wikipedia languages sites operate independently from each other, thus each site has their own guidelines. For English (EN) Wikipedia, for a page to be merit a page in the mainspace, the subject needs to be notable, the content needs to support by (1) significant coverage of (2) independent (secondary sources), (3) reliable sources, which the sources talk "directly" about the subject and not merely passing mentioned. (4) the content also needs to be free of copyright infringement and (5) written in neutral point of view - NO WP:PROMOTION. What you would do is to add the sources from the Swedish Wikipedia to EN Wikipedia page. Sources can be in any languages. See referencing on how to provide inline citation and for source from internet, you can use "horizontal" Template:Cite Web template.Once the inline citations are provided then submit the draft for review. Let me know if anything else I could help. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:42, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CASSIOPEIA: I appreciate your guidance and I will make sure to follow your instruction. Thanks! Pinecone23 (talk) 10:54, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome Pinecone23. Pls note I added "NO" promotion in article on my above message. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:03, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CASSIOPEIA: Looking at Special:PermaLink/896415470, the revison of Street lighting in Stockholm when you draftified it, I see no WP:PROMO. Please elaborate why you make a point of it. Sam Sailor 08:08, 8 June 2019 (UTC) (please ping on reply)[reply]

Sam Sailor Greetings. I just layout all the important info for an editor to note the requirements/guardline for an aritlce to be acceptable. I later add the "NO" before "WP:PROMOTION as I missed the "NO" out in my initial message. Why the way, may I ask why the questions was being raised? Cheers. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:23, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

​Because the wording is clumsy and leaves the impression that you are warning the editor of promo. They have been here for almost three years, so the newbie instructions should not be needed unless there is a specific issue that meeds to be addressed. Sam Sailor 08:36, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Sailor That was not meant as a warning but just listed important notes/requirements. I added as they were no sources provided on the article which most of us would think a editor of three years would know - see here [1]. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:43, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CASSIOPEIA: If you are moving new articles to draft space only because they are unsourced, then I believe you are misunderstanding WP:DRAFTIFY, which I urge you to re-read before you move more articles. Do you mind me asking what your first language is? Sam Sailor 08:57, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Sailor Hi, as per WP:NPPDRAFT "A newly-created article may be about a generally acceptable topic, but be far from sufficiently developed or sourced for publication. Such pages can be moved to the draft namespace". I dont really have a first language as I am multilingual, growing in an environment (family and school) that we would communicate few different languages on one conversation setting. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:30, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CASSIOPEIA: Notice that WP:NPPDRAFT specifically states "Such pages can be moved to the draft namespace". Do you understand the difference between "can", "should" and "must"? Please notice that WP:DRAFTIFY says "The page is obviously unready for mainspace. It does not meet WP:STUB; or it would have very little chance of survival at AfD; or it meets any speedy deletion criterion." I do not believe it is good practice to draftify an article with 4694 characters (787 words) "readable prose size" as was the size of Street lighting in Stockholm just because it is unsourced. What other options could you have used? Sam Sailor 09:50, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Sailor Hi, I refer to WP:NPPDRAFT and you refer to WP:DRAFTIFY. If it states "can" then one could perform the action but it is not a "must" or "should" - I guess you are treating me as a second grade English class student here, say ya. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:30, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Street lighting in Stockholm, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Stevey7788 (talk) 12:02, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Street lighting in Stockholm and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Street lighting in Stockholm, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 19:15, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Windmills in Stockholm, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Masum Reza^📞 13:42, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pinecone23. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "White Man's Burden".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 04:41, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pinecone23. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Nature area (Sweden).

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:31, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Windmills in Stockholm, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Blood on Snow, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pinecone23. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Blood on Snow".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 16:51, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Windmills in Stockholm, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pinecone23. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Windmills in Stockholm".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:51, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pinecone23. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Windmills in Stockholm".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:33, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Pinecone23 for copy edits totaling over 8,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE July 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 01:01, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Minor Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Pinecone23 for copy edits totaling between 1 and 3,999 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE September 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 08:47, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]