Talk:Kash Patel
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Biography: Politics and Government Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
New York (state): Long Island Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
Alex Ward was wrong
This article needs to be updated with the latest reporting from Axios (https://www.axios.com/off-the-rails-trump-cia-kash-patel-6c5ea317-43e9-48da-993f-5c7ab823c4c1.html), as well as the fact that there's a new administration. -- 72.194.4.183 (talk) 07:25, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 21 January 2021
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add the following information to the "Early Career" section discussing his employment as a trial attorney in the United States Department of Justice National Security Division:
In February 2016, Patel sparked controversy after attending a court proceeding before a District Court Judge in Houston without proper attire. The Judge commented to Patel: "what is the utility to me and to the people of America to have you fly down here at their expense, eat at their expense and stay at their expense when there are plenty of capable people over there, in this room plus over there? You’re just one more nonessential employee from Washington. . . . You don’t add a bit of value, do you?"
The Judge suggested taxpayer money by attending the hearing in the first place. He subsequently excused Patel from the proceedings and issued an "Order on Ineptitude" to describe his conduct.
[2] [3] Smooster1213 (talk) 00:09, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- Not done. WP:UNDUE concerns, not WP:NPOV. ◢ Ganbaruby! (Say hi!) 01:02, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- Incredible repudiation of documented and linked information on this topic - very relevant to the main entry. Who are these people - GanBarRuby? Kash Patel? Jack Ruby? SUPPRESSORS with Pre-Judice.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:8a:400:8710:85d2:87fd:6243:61bf (talk • contribs) 17:39, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Done I concur, so I've added some of the material to the article. There are WP:NPOV problems without it, which would seem to be covering up the warts and blemishes on this BLP. Elizium23 (talk) 06:08, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- Incredible repudiation of documented and linked information on this topic - very relevant to the main entry. Who are these people - GanBarRuby? Kash Patel? Jack Ruby? SUPPRESSORS with Pre-Judice.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:8a:400:8710:85d2:87fd:6243:61bf (talk • contribs) 17:39, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
References
- ^ https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/you-dont-add-a-bit-of-value-do-you-texas-judge-berates-government-lawyers/2016/02/11/0b3a181c-d006-11e5-88cd-753e80cd29ad_story.html
- ^ https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/
- ^ https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/you-dont-add-a-bit-of-value-do-you-texas-judge-berates-government-lawyers/2016/02/11/0b3a181c-d006-11e5-88cd-753e80cd29ad_story.html
Lol, this is one of the most biased, poorly sourced Wikipedia entries I think I've seen.
It seems wikipedia isn't even attempting to create the veneer that it is an apolitical, fact based source. Briandrewdrew (talk) 02:21, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- WP:SOFIXIT. clpo13(talk) 02:33, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Correct. Wikipedia is nowhere near reality. They should have just stuck with movie articles and basic pop culture. They can't even get the ABBA page done right. Good grief! 2600:1700:9F90:2EA0:986B:ABB8:6062:F40E (talk) 16:14, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
PLEASE REMOVE ATTEMPTS.
The truth is they didn't attempt, they had succeeded in proving that Christopher Steele, author of the "Steele Dossier" was paid for by the DNC by using a subpoena on a bank, forcing Fusion GPS to admit that Christopher Steele had been paid for by the DNC, aswell as having 65 "witnesses" ranging from attorney generals to James Comey himself, admit under oath, that there was no evidence or information that the Trump administration colluded, conspired, or coordinated with any member of the Russian government to secure the election victory.
STOP BEING BIAS AND JUST TELL THE TRUTH. 65.94.104.215 (talk) 20:47, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- Unhinged WP:OR nonsense. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 23:49, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, you are, Snoogan. And stay off my pages at Uncyclo. Nobody cares what your problem is. 2600:1700:9F90:2EA0:986B:ABB8:6062:F40E (talk) 16:16, 28 May 2022 (UTC)