Jump to content

Talk:Shiv Sena (1966–2022): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
top: discretionary sanctions
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
|archive = Talk:Shiv Sena/Archive %(counter)d
|archive = Talk:Shiv Sena/Archive %(counter)d
}}
}}

How come its not marked as an Islamophobic party? that is such a large part of political programme [[Special:Contributions/45.44.224.14|45.44.224.14]] ([[User talk:45.44.224.14|talk]]) 15:24, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/shiv-sena-caa-mns-raj-thackeray-1639986-2020-01-25


== Semi-protected edit request on 29 February 2020 ==
== Semi-protected edit request on 29 February 2020 ==

Revision as of 15:25, 1 June 2020

How come its not marked as an Islamophobic party? that is such a large part of political programme 45.44.224.14 (talk) 15:24, 1 June 2020 (UTC) https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/shiv-sena-caa-mns-raj-thackeray-1639986-2020-01-25[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 29 February 2020

At the end of "Alliance with BJP" section, include:

After the 2019 Maharashtra Legislative Assembly election results, Shiv Sena declined to support BJP for the government formation demanding an equal share in the power and withdrew from National Democratic Alliance. Hardeepasrani (talk) 20:31, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hardeepasrani:  Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Can I Log In (talk) 03:56, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Can I Log In: I'm new to Wikipedia as a contributor so correct me when I'm wrong. This should serve as a reliable source as there's an entire article on Wikipedia about the 2019_Maharashtra_political_crisis.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hardeepasrani (talkcontribs) 2020-03-01 12:38 (UTC)
@Hardeepasrani: You edit requst has been answered by someone else. Wikipedia can be edit by anyone. Sometimes, things that do not follow wikipedia policies can slip by unnoticed. Sources you want to cite on wikipedia should be secondary sources. Wikipedia is a tertiary source, but you can still use 'em. The issue with using wikipedia as a source is that there is a lack of accuracy and fact-checking, and therefore, are not reliable. For more info on this subject, see WP:WPNOTRS To reply, copy and paste this: {{SUBST:replyto|[[User:Can I Log In|Can I Log In]]}} ([[User talk|talk]]) 00:25, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Done It's a good suggested edit since it is a major change in the party's relations; I've used slightly different text, but conveyed the same information. Goldsztajn (talk) 22:37, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]