Talk:Transfix: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Diachronic: new section |
rerate stub->Start |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Linguistics|class= |
{{WikiProject Linguistics|class=|importance=Low}} |
||
Thanks for the ref, but half of the new examples arguably did not contain transfixes. Rather, one could argue that the imperfectives are formed from a person prefix plus a number infix, so I restored the older and simpler examples. [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 08:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC) |
Thanks for the ref, but half of the new examples arguably did not contain transfixes. Rather, one could argue that the imperfectives are formed from a person prefix plus a number infix, so I restored the older and simpler examples. [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 08:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:11, 2 December 2013
Linguistics Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Thanks for the ref, but half of the new examples arguably did not contain transfixes. Rather, one could argue that the imperfectives are formed from a person prefix plus a number infix, so I restored the older and simpler examples. kwami (talk) 08:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Diachronic
The article lacks diachronic explanation of how transfixes arise. What sources have explored this? --98.226.71.46 (talk) 17:43, 4 August 2013 (UTC)