Jump to content

Talk:Transfix: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Diachronic: new section
rerate stub->Start
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Linguistics|class=Stub|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Linguistics|class=|importance=Low}}


Thanks for the ref, but half of the new examples arguably did not contain transfixes. Rather, one could argue that the imperfectives are formed from a person prefix plus a number infix, so I restored the older and simpler examples. [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 08:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the ref, but half of the new examples arguably did not contain transfixes. Rather, one could argue that the imperfectives are formed from a person prefix plus a number infix, so I restored the older and simpler examples. [[User:Kwamikagami|kwami]] ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|talk]]) 08:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:11, 2 December 2013

WikiProject iconLinguistics Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Thanks for the ref, but half of the new examples arguably did not contain transfixes. Rather, one could argue that the imperfectives are formed from a person prefix plus a number infix, so I restored the older and simpler examples. kwami (talk) 08:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Diachronic

The article lacks diachronic explanation of how transfixes arise. What sources have explored this? --98.226.71.46 (talk) 17:43, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]