Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 March 17: Difference between revisions

Template:Pro (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Agree (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Pro with Template:Agree.
Exact same usage. Also, there's an interwiki conflict between d:Q5056 and d:Q6257793. kwan-in (talk) 23:36, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to {{Agree}} which is better. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 12:45, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:British dependencies (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:United Kingdom constituents and affiliations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:British dependencies with Template:United Kingdom constituents and affiliations.
Proposed by User:Wikipean, nominating here on that user's behalf. Ego White Tray (talk) 04:14, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:17, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Abu Bakr (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Khalid ibn al-Walid (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Ibrahim (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Adam (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Nuh (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Aisha (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Israfil (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Khadijah (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Fatimah (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

These are hard-coded instances of infoboxes that should not exist as separate templates, but should be integrated in mainspace. They have few (if any) links related to the main subjects so they're not viable as navboxes (there are exceptions like {{Khalid ibn al-Walid}}, but there's already a campaignbox about his battles). eh bien mon prince (talk) 21:44, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• See WT:WikiProject Templates for preliminary discussion. Agree that these should be executed as standard infoboxes within article space and deleted as hardcoded duplicates. VanIsaac_{WS Vex}^contribs 00:15, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• I don't agree, i think every one of them could be developed more and more. Dzlinker \,,/(*_*)\,,/ 10:55, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• i too don't agree that they should be deleted i have changed the {{Ibrahim}} as here. --Ibrahim ebi (talk) 15:31, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2013 music (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Replaced by Template:YYYY music for flexibility and uniformity. Iketsi (talk) 19:55, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Agree with nom, but couldn't the new template be named to something more descriptive like "Music by year" or "Years in music". --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 20:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I support deleting all music by year templates to conform to the uniformity that has been proposed and implemented. As the one who created the templates up for deletion, my knowledge of constructing templates at the time was lacking, so I am glad that someone "polished" my contribution. (Tigerghost (talk) 05:15, 18 March 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Template:2012 music (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Replaced by Template:YYYY music for flexibility and uniformity. Iketsi (talk) 19:53, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2011 music (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Replaced by Template:YYYY music for flexibility and uniformity. Iketsi (talk) 19:48, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2010 music (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Replaced by Template:YYYY music for flexibility and uniformity. Iketsi (talk) 19:41, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2009 music (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Replaced by Template:YYYY music for flexibility and uniformity. Iketsi (talk) 19:27, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:LinkTalk (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I created this template, my first, then it was suggested on the village pump that I could just modify la2 directly, the template this is based on. So I did that. So this one is a duplicate of La2 now. Silas Ropac (talk) 17:47, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete - You could probably speedy delete it as G6 or G7, or even G2. Nice improvement, by the way. -PC-XT+ 05:00, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Southeastern Conference Men's Basketball Rookie of the Year navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Naavbox overkill. WikiProject:College Basketball has drwan the line for templates at Conference player of the Year and would not support adding an entire new class of conference templates to the mix. We already probably have too many Rikster2 (talk) 00:56, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Tthe established understanding, if not the express consensus of WikiProject College Basketball is to emphasize major national awards, honors and championships over conference-level awards, honors and championships. Being the conference freshman of the year, while deserving mention in a college player's infobox and article text, does not rate the need for another navbox among many. It's simply a matter of prioritization. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 01:16, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per general consensus on treatment of varying degrees of notable awards.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:06, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I support a stand-alone list article for Rookie of the Year, but not an accompanying navbox. As Rikster mentioned, WP:CBB believes Division I overall conference players of the year deserve navboxes, but not when you start trivializing these awards to rookie-level. Jrcla2 (talk) 15:52, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]