User talk:Rohirok: Difference between revisions
→About Ricardo Lagos in List of Agnostic: wiki link |
KeithTyler (talk | contribs) Demkina RFM |
||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
Absolutely it is confirmed ; Ricardo Lagos have been all his life AGNOSTIC. Everybody knows in Chile, he always has said it. Michelle Bachellet is agnostic too. I'am from Chile and I know what I write. Please it does not erase it!. ''(This unsigned comment was left by [[User:ANDRÉS NÚÑEZ]])'' |
Absolutely it is confirmed ; Ricardo Lagos have been all his life AGNOSTIC. Everybody knows in Chile, he always has said it. Michelle Bachellet is agnostic too. I'am from Chile and I know what I write. Please it does not erase it!. ''(This unsigned comment was left by [[User:ANDRÉS NÚÑEZ]])'' |
||
== Demkina RFM == |
|||
{{RFM-Filed|Natasha Demkina|Natasha Demkina}} |
|||
Note: I know you're not involved with the article anymore, but I thought you might possibly want to be involved in RFM. Or not. I just felt you should be notified as a possible party. - [[User:KeithTyler|Keith D. Tyler]] [[User_talk:KeithTyler|¶]] <small>([[WP:AMA|AMA]])</small> 18:33, 14 April 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:33, 14 April 2006
Here are some links I thought useful:
- Wikipedia:Tutorial
- Wikipedia:Help desk
- M:Foundation issues
- Wikipedia:Policy Library
- Wikipedia:Utilities
- Wikipedia:Cite your sources
- Wikipedia:Verifiability
- Wikipedia:Wikiquette
- Wikipedia:Civility
- Wikipedia:Conflict resolution
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Wikipedia:Pages needing attention
- Wikipedia:Peer review
- Wikipedia:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
- Wikipedia:Brilliant prose
- Wikipedia:List of images
- Wikipedia:Boilerplate text
- Wikipedia:Current polls
- Wikipedia:Mailing lists
- Wikipedia:IRC channel
Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. The Wikipedia:Village pump is also a good place to go for quick answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.
Sam [Spade] 14:22, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
I've added a little reply on Talk:Baptist re: Baptists as Protestants. I agree it was wishy-washy the way it was stated, but the truth of the matter was lurking just below. The article text was ALMOST correct, just without making clear statements as to why. --ABQCat 05:28, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
||
Thanks for your work on the Telecaster article! It's really strong now. Auto movil 14:02, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Hello. I received your message on the above. Because you can assure that you will maintain the list, I will change my vote to keep and rename. Jtmichcock 14:05, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for the ArbCom Vote!
I wanted to thank my few "yes voters" in person...well, not in person, but at least contact you directly. Thank you for your vote, and for saying that you "liked me." It is appreciated. I love you.
Rowlan 15:57, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for voting!
Hello there! I wanted to thank you for taking the time to vote on my arbitration commitee nomination. Although it was not successful, I appreciate the time you spent to read my statement and questions and for then voting, either positively or negativly. Again, thank you! Páll (Die pienk olifant) 22:36, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Great work on Bigsby
I was going to come back to it, I'd just restored the link to tremolo while I investigated what disregarding rhythm to rapidly produce pitches when musical notation calls for such a treatment was supposed to mean. I'm still not entirely sure. But you've addressed my concerns I think, and more. Andrewa 18:14, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Hi
Wow... an American Baptist (minister?) from Cincinnati who plays a brass instrument? I'm starting to wonder if I know you.
Atchius 00:10, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Mediation Case: The Humanist papacy
Comments concerning this mediation case and the edit war leading up to it have been deleted. The matter is resolved.
Mediation Case: Natasha Demkina
Following wholly justified complaints concerning my mediation attempt for this case, I stepped down as mediator. As I was no longer mediating, and did not intend to continue participating in the article whatsoever, I deleted all comments here concerning the issue. It was objected that this constituted censorship. This objection was retracted. It was also suggested by two others that this constituted a violation of civility according to Wikipedia standards, to which I respond below. I believe this settles the matter, though I welcome corrections to my understanding of the policy. Rohirok 01:45, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
- I have read the policy concerning user talk pages. According to the first paragraph, while many treat their user talk pages the same way as regular talk pages, regularly archiving past comments rather than deleting them, it is also acceptable to delete them after they have been responded to. As I have withdrawn completely from the Demkina article, I do not see how any further response concerning the article and my aborted attempt at mediation is called for by Wikipedia civility standards, and therefore I believe that deletion of comments concerning that article are acceptable. My involvement with two contentious issues over the past couple of weeks has prompted me to take a break from editing Wikipedia, a break that has been postponed while I cut off these loose ends on my talk page. If and when I return, for the sake of starting with a new attitude, I would much rather not have the comments documenting these burnout-inducing disputes staring back at me on my own talk page. So, barring any further interpretations of Wikipedia policy being offered in opposition to the action, I will delete the comments relating to these issues. Rohirok 22:27, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
About Ricardo Lagos in List of Agnostic
Absolutely it is confirmed ; Ricardo Lagos have been all his life AGNOSTIC. Everybody knows in Chile, he always has said it. Michelle Bachellet is agnostic too. I'am from Chile and I know what I write. Please it does not erase it!. (This unsigned comment was left by User:ANDRÉS NÚÑEZ)
Demkina RFM
Note: I know you're not involved with the article anymore, but I thought you might possibly want to be involved in RFM. Or not. I just felt you should be notified as a possible party. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ (AMA) 18:33, 14 April 2006 (UTC)