Jump to content

Rosalind Franklin: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
[pending revision][pending revision]
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
}}
}}


Hey Stephen(25 July 1920 – 16 April 1958) was a [[British citizenship|British]] [[biophysicist]] who was trained as a [[chemist]] and specialized in [[X-ray crystallography]],<ref name=nlmSite>''The Rosalind Franklin Papers. The Holes in Coal: Research at BCURA and in Paris, 1942-1951'', Profiles in Science, Documents. [[National Library of Medicine]], [http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/KR/Views/Exhibit/narrative/coal.html].</ref> She made important contributions to the scientific understanding of the molecular structures of [[coal]] and [[graphite]] and, using [[X-ray crystallography|X-ray diffraction]], [[DNA]], [[RNA]] and [[viruses]]. The [[DNA]] work achieved the most fame because DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) plays essential roles in cell metabolism and [[genetics]] and the discovery of its structure helped scientists understand how genetic information is passed from parents to children.
(25 July 1920 – 16 April 1958) was a [[British citizenship|British]] [[biophysicist]] who was trained as a [[chemist]] and specialized in [[X-ray crystallography]],<ref name=nlmSite>''The Rosalind Franklin Papers. The Holes in Coal: Research at BCURA and in Paris, 1942-1951'', Profiles in Science, Documents. [[National Library of Medicine]], [http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/KR/Views/Exhibit/narrative/coal.html].</ref> She made important contributions to the scientific understanding of the molecular structures of [[coal]] and [[graphite]] and, using [[X-ray crystallography|X-ray diffraction]], [[DNA]], [[RNA]] and [[viruses]]. The [[DNA]] work achieved the most fame because DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) plays essential roles in cell metabolism and [[genetics]] and the discovery of its structure helped scientists understand how genetic information is passed from parents to children.


By using a technique called X-ray diffraction, Franklin obtained results which led to the realization that a DNA molecule consists of an intertwined [[double helix]] of atoms. An X-ray diffraction experiment directs a beam of X-rays through a sample of a substance onto a screen. A pattern of spots is formed. This is recorded, and used to calculate the arrangement of atoms in the sample. Franklin worked on [[DNA]] in the [[Medical Research Council]] Biophysics Unit at King's College, London, using her expertise in dealing with amorphous materials.
By using a technique called X-ray diffraction, Franklin obtained results which led to the realization that a DNA molecule consists of an intertwined [[double helix]] of atoms. An X-ray diffraction experiment directs a beam of X-rays through a sample of a substance onto a screen. A pattern of spots is formed. This is recorded, and used to calculate the arrangement of atoms in the sample. Franklin worked on [[DNA]] in the [[Medical Research Council]] Biophysics Unit at King's College, London, using her expertise in dealing with amorphous materials.

Revision as of 18:41, 3 March 2011

Rosalind Franklin
Born25 July 1920 (1920-07-25)
Notting Hill, London
Died16 April 1958 (1958-04-17) (age 37)
Chelsea, London
Cause of deathCancer of the ovary
NationalityBritish
Alma materNewnham College, Cambridge
Known forFine structure of coal and graphite, DNA structure, viruses
Scientific career
FieldsX-ray crystallography
InstitutionsBritish Coal Utilisation Research Association
Laboratoire central des services chimiques de l'État
King's College London
Birkbeck College, London

Hello Stalker Children(25 July 1920 – 16 April 1958) was a British biophysicist who was trained as a chemist and specialized in X-ray crystallography,[1] She made important contributions to the scientific understanding of the molecular structures of coal and graphite and, using X-ray diffraction, DNA, RNA and viruses. The DNA work achieved the most fame because DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) plays essential roles in cell metabolism and genetics and the discovery of its structure helped scientists understand how genetic information is passed from parents to children.

By using a technique called X-ray diffraction, Franklin obtained results which led to the realization that a DNA molecule consists of an intertwined double helix of atoms. An X-ray diffraction experiment directs a beam of X-rays through a sample of a substance onto a screen. A pattern of spots is formed. This is recorded, and used to calculate the arrangement of atoms in the sample. Franklin worked on DNA in the Medical Research Council Biophysics Unit at King's College, London, using her expertise in dealing with amorphous materials.

Franklin's role in the discovery of the structure of DNA remains controversial. She recorded a photograph of a DNA molecule that her supervisor, Maurice Wilkins, showed to James Watson and Francis Crick without her knowledge or permission. This image helped Watson and Crick construct a model of DNA, which enabled them to fully understand the molecule's structure. Wilkins, Crick and Watson were awarded a Nobel Prize jointly, some years later, after Franklin's death. Hostility between Franklin and her colleagues is a matter of record. There has been extensive comment in biographical works[2][3][4] and other publications that her work did not bring adequate recognition during her lifetime. Some claim this was due to prejudice. The arguments have focused on details that include the restriction of the Senior Common Room at King's College to men, cultural differences between a rich, cosmopolitan sophisticate and boisterous British ex-sevicemen ("macho rowdies")[5] and Watson's reference to Franklin as "Rosie" and his comments on her appearance in his memoir The Double Helix, which he wrote on his return to Harvard from Cambridge.

Franklin died at the age of 37 from complications arising from ovarian cancer. Several major institutions and awards have been named in her memory.

Background

Franklin was born in Notting Hill, London[6] into an affluent and influential British-Jewish family.[7] Her father was Ellis Arthur Franklin (1894–1964), a London merchant banker and her mother was Muriel Frances Waley (1894–1976); she was the elder daughter and second of the family of five children. Her father's uncle was Herbert Samuel (later Viscount Samuel) who was Home Secretary in 1916 and the first practising Jew to serve in the British Cabinet.[8] He was also the first High Commissioner (effectively governor) for the British Mandate of Palestine. Her aunt Helen Carolin Franklin was married to Norman de Mattos Bentwich, who was Attorney General in the British Mandate of Palestine.[9] She was active in trade union organisation and women's suffrage, and was later a member of the London County Council.[10][11]

Franklin was educated at St Paul's Girls' School and North London Collegiate School[12][13] where she excelled in science, Latin[14] and sports.[15] Her family was actively involved with a Working Men's College, where Ellis Franklin, her father, taught electricity, magnetism and the history of the Great War in the evenings and later became vice principal.[16][17] Later Franklin's family helped settle Jewish refugees from Europe who had escaped the Nazis.[11]

Cambridge, Kingston and Paris

Franklin went up to Newnham College, Cambridge in 1938, and studied chemistry within the Natural Sciences Tripos. One of the demonstrators who taught her was the spectroscopist W.C. Price. Later, he was one of her senior colleagues at King's College.[18] In 1941 she was awarded Second Class Honours in her Finals. This was accepted as a bachelor's degree, in the qualifications for employment. Cambridge started to award the titular B.A. and M.A. to women in 1947, and earlier women graduates received these retroactively.[19] Franklin was awarded a research fellowship and, according to an entry on the web site of the Dolan DNA Learning Center of the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, that is supported by the National Cancer Institute, "She spent a year in R.G.W. Norrish's lab without great success."[20] Later, he received a Nobel Prize for his contributions to chemical kinetics.

Franklin continued to meet the requirements of the National Service Act by working as an Assistant Research Officer at the British Coal Utilisation Research Association (BCURA). The BCURA was located on the Coombe Springs Estate, near Kingston upon Thames on the South West outskirts of London. Professor Norrish was a wartime advisor to BCURA. John G. Bennett was the Director. Marcello Pirani and Victor Goldschmidt, both refugees from the Nazis, were consultants and lectured at BCURA while Franklin was there. She studied the porosity of coal. This work was the basis of her Ph.D. thesis The physical chemistry of solid organic colloids with special reference to coal for which Cambridge University awarded her a Ph.D. in 1945. It was also the basis of several papers. [1] The French scientist Adrienne Weill was one of Franklin's tutors at Newnham. At the end of the war, according to Sayre, Franklin asked Weill to let her know of job openings for "a physical chemist who knows very little physical chemistry, but quite a lot about the holes in coal". At a conference in the Fall of 1946, Weill introduced Franklin to Marcel Mathieu, a director of the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), the network of institutes that comprise the major part of the scientific research laboratories supported by the French government. This led to Franklin's appointment with Jacques Mering at the Laboratoire Central des Services Chimiques de l'Etat in Paris.

The web site [1] provides the following information. Mering was a crystallographer who applied X-ray diffraction to the study of rayon and other amorphous substances, in contrast to the thousands of regular crystals that had been studied by this method for many years. He taught her the practical aspects of applying X-ray crystallography to amorphous substances. This presented new challenges, in the conduct of experiments and the interpretation of results. Franklin applied them to further problems related to coal, in particular the changes to the arrangement of atoms when it is converted to graphite. Franklin published several further papers on this work. It became part of the main stream of work on the physics and chemistry of coal, covered by a current monograph,[21] the annual[22] and other publications. Mering also continued the study of carbon in various forms, using X-ray diffraction and other methods.[23]

King's College London

Double helix

In January 1951, Franklin started working as a research associate at King's College London in the Medical Research Council's (MRC) Biophysics Unit, directed by John Randall.[24] Although originally she was to have worked on x-ray diffraction of proteins and lipids in solution, Randall redirected her work to DNA fibers before she started working at King's since Franklin was to be the only experienced experimental diffraction researcher at King's in 1951.[25][26] He made this reassignment, even before she started working at King's, because of the following pioneering work by Maurice Wilkins and Raymond Gosling- a PhD student assigned to help Franklin.[27][28] Even using crude equipment, these two men had obtained an outstanding diffraction picture of DNA which sparked further interest in this molecule. Wilkins and Gosling had been carrying out x-ray diffraction analysis of DNA in the Unit since May 1950, but Randall had not informed them that he had asked Franklin to take over both the DNA diffraction work and guidance of Gosling's thesis.[29] Randall's lack of communication about this reassignment significantly contributed to the well documented friction that developed between Wilkins and Franklin.[30]

Franklin, working with her student Raymond Gosling,[31] started to apply her expertise in x-ray diffraction techniques to the structure of DNA. She used a new fine focus x-ray tube and microcamera ordered by Wilkins, but which she refined, adjusted and focused carefully. Drawing upon her physical chemistry background, Franklin also skillfully manipulated the critical hydration of her specimens.[32] When Wilkins inquired about this improved technique, Franklin replied in terms which offended Wilkins as Franklin had "an air of cool superiority".[33] Franklin's habit of intensely looking people in the eye while being concise, impatient and directly confrontational to the point of abrasiveness unnerved many of her colleagues. In stark contrast, Wilkins was very shy, and slowly calculating in speech while he avoided looking anyone directly in the eye.[34] In spite of the intense atmosphere, Franklin and Gosling discovered that there were two forms of DNA: at high humidity (when wet), the DNA fibre became long and thin; when it was dried it became short and fat.[35][36] These forms were termed DNA 'B' and 'A' respectively. Because of the intense personality conflict developing between Franklin and Wilkins, Randall[37] divided the work on DNA. Franklin chose the data rich A form while Wilkins selected the 'B' form[38][39] because his preliminary pictures had hinted it might be helical. He showed tremendous insight in this assessment of preliminary data. The x-ray diffraction pictures taken by Franklin at this time have been called, by J. D. Bernal, "amongst the most beautiful x-ray photographs of any substance ever taken".[35]

By the end of 1951 it was generally accepted at King's that the B form of DNA was a helix, but after she had recorded an asymmetrical image in 1952 May, Franklin became unconvinced that the A form of DNA was helical in structure.[40] In July 1952, as a practical joke on Wilkins (who frequently expressed his view that DNA was helical), Franklin and Gosling produced a death notice regretting the 'death' of helical crystalline DNA (A-DNA).[41] During 1952, Rosalind Franklin and Raymond Gosling worked at applying the Patterson function to the x-ray pictures of DNA they had produced.[42] This was a long and labour-intensive approach but would yield significant insight into the structure of the molecule.[43][44]

File:Rosalindfranklinsjokecard.jpg
Franklin and Gosling death notice for a helical structure for crystalline DNA (or A-DNA)

By January 1953, Franklin had reconciled her conflicting data and had started to write a series of three draft manuscripts, two of which included a double helical DNA backbone (see below). Her two A form manuscripts reached Acta Crystallographica in Copenhagen on 6 March 1953,[45] one day before Crick and Watson had completed their model.[46] Franklin must have mailed them while the Cambridge team was building their model, and certainly had written them before she knew of their work. On 8 July 1953 she modified one of these "in proof", Acta articles "in light of recent work" by the King's and Cambridge research teams.[47] The third draft paper on the 'B' form of DNA, dated 17 January 1953, was discovered years later amongst her papers, by Franklin's Birkbeck colleague, Aaron Klug. He then published an evaluation of the draft's close correlation with the third of the original trio of 25 April 1953 Nature DNA articles.[48] Klug designed this paper to complement the first article he had written defending Franklin's significant contribution to DNA structure.[49] He had written this first article in response to the incomplete picture of Franklin's work depicted in Watson's 1968 memoir, The Double Helix.

As vividly described in The Double Helix, on 30 January 1953, Watson travelled to King's carrying a preprint of Linus Pauling's incorrect proposal for DNA structure. Since Wilkins was not in his office, Watson went to Franklin's lab with his urgent message that they should all collaborate before Pauling discovered his error. The unimpressed Franklin became angry when Watson suggested she did not know how to interpret her own data. Watson hastily retreated, backing into Wilkins who had been attracted by the commotion. Wilkins commiserated with his harried friend and then changed the course of DNA history with the following disclosure. Watson was shown (by Wilkins) Franklin's famous photograph 51, which had been given to Wilkins by Gosling. Watson, in turn, showed Wilkins a pre-publication manuscript by Pauling and Corey.[50] Franklin and Gosling's photo 51 gave the Cambridge pair critical insights into the DNA structure, whereas Pauling and Corey's paper described a molecule remarkably like their first incorrect model.

In February 1953, Francis Crick and James D. Watson of the Cavendish Laboratory in Cambridge University had started to build a model of the B form of DNA using similar data to that available to both teams at King's. Much of their data were derived directly from research done at King's by Wilkins and Franklin. Franklin's research was completed by February 1953, ahead of her move to Birkbeck, and her data were critical.[51] Model building had been applied successfully in the elucidation of the structure of the alpha helix by Linus Pauling in 1951,[38][52] but Franklin was opposed to prematurely building theoretical models, until sufficient data were obtained properly to guide the model building. She took the view that building a model was to be undertaken only after enough of the structure was known.[40][53] Ever cautious she wanted to eliminate misleading possibilities. Photographs of her Birkbeck work table[54] show that she routinely used small molecular models, although certainly not ones on the grand scale successfully used at Cambridge for DNA. In the middle of February 1953, Crick's thesis advisor, Max Perutz gave Crick a copy of a report written for a Medical Research Council biophysics committee visit to King's in December 1952, containing many of Franklin's crystallographic calculations.[55] Since Franklin had decided to transfer to Birkbeck College and Randall had insisted that all DNA work must stay at King's, Wilkins was given copies of Franklin's diffraction photographs by Gosling. By 28 February 1953 Watson and Crick felt they had solved the problem enough for Crick to proclaim (in the local pub) that they had "found the secret of life".[56] However they knew they must complete their model before they could be certain.[57]

Watson and Crick finished building their model on 7 March 1953, one day before they received a letter from Wilkins stating that Franklin was finally leaving and they could put "all hands to the pump".[58] This was also one day after Franklin's two A form papers had reached Acta Crystallogrphica. Wilkins came to see the model the following week, according to Maddox on 12 March, and allegedly informed Gosling on his return to King's.[59] It is uncertain how long it took for Gosling to inform Franklin at Birkbeck, but her original 17 March B form manuscript does not reflect any knowledge of the Cambridge model. Franklin did modify this draft later before publishing it as the third in the trio of 25 April 1953 Nature articles. On 18 March,[60] in response to receiving a copy of their preliminary manuscript, Wilkins penned the following "I think you're a couple of old rogues, but you may well have something".[61]

Crick and Watson then published their model in Nature on 25 April 1953 in an article describing the double-helical structure of DNA with only a footnote acknowledging "having been stimulated by a general knowledge of" Franklin and Wilkin's 'unpublished' contribution.[62] Actually, although it was the bare minimum, they had just enough specific knowledge of Franklin and Gosling's data upon which to base their model. As a result of a deal struck by the two laboratory directors, articles by Wilkins and Franklin, which included their x-ray diffraction data, were modified and then published second and third in the same issue of Nature, seemingly only in support of the Crick and Watson theoretical paper which proposed a model for the B form of DNA.[63][64] Franklin left King's College London in March 1953 to move to Birkbeck College in a move that had been planned for some time.[42]

Weeks later, on 10 April, Franklin wrote to Crick for permission to see their model.[65] Franklin retained her scepticism for premature model building even after seeing the Crick–Watson model, and remained unimpressed. She is reported to have commented, "It's very pretty, but how are they going to prove it?" As an experimental scientist Franklin seems to have been interested in producing far greater evidence before publishing-as-proven a proposed model. As such her response to the Crick–Watson model was in keeping with her cautious approach to science.[66] However, as documented above, she did not hesitate to publish preliminary ideas about DNA in Acta, even before they could be definitively proven. Most of the scientific community hesitated several years before accepting the double helix proposal. At first mainly geneticists embraced the model because of its obvious genetic implications. Broader acceptance for the DNA double helix did not start until about 1960, and was not openly acknowledged until 1961 during the 1962 Nobel prize nominations. It took Wilkins and his colleagues approximately seven years to collect enough data to prove and refine the proposed DNA structure. According to the 1961 Crick–Monod letter cited above, this experimental proof, along with Wilkins having initiated the DNA diffraction work, were the reasons why Crick felt that Wilkins should be included in the DNA Nobel prize.

Birkbeck College

Electronmicrograph of Tobacco Mosaic Virus

Franklin's work in Birkbeck involved the use of x-ray crystallography to study the structure of the tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) as a senior scientist with her own research group, funded by the Agricultural Research Council (ARC).[67] She was recruited by physics department chair J. D. Bernal,[68] a brilliant crystallographer who happened to be an Irish communist, known for promoting women crystallographers. In 1954 Franklin began a longstanding and successful collaboration with Aaron Klug.[69] In 1955 Franklin had a paper published in the journal Nature, indicating that TMV virus particles were all of the same length,[70] this was in direct contradiction to the ideas of the eminent virologist Norman Pirie, though her observation ultimately proved correct.[71]

Franklin, and the research group she headed, focused on the structure of RNA, a molecule equally central to life as DNA. RNA actually constitutes the genome (central information molecule) of many viruses, including tobacco mosaic virus. She assigned the study of rod-like viruses such as TMV (tobacco mosaic virus) to her PhD student Kenneth Holmes, while her colleague Aaron Klug worked on spherical viruses with his student John Finch, with Franklin coordinating and overseeing the work.[72] Franklin also had a research assistant, James Watt, subsidised by the National Coal Board and was now the Leader of the "ARC group at Birkbeck.[73] By the end of 1955 her team had completed a model of the TMV, to be exhibited at the upcoming Brussels World's fair. The Birkbeck team members were working on RNA viruses affecting several plants, including potato, turnip, tomato and pea.[74] Franklin and Don Caspar produced a paper each in Nature that taken together demonstrated that the DNA in TMV is wound along the inner surface of the hollow virus.[75][76]

Her former colleagues at Birkbeck College, London Aaron Klug, John Finch and Kenneth Holmes moved to the Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge in 1962.

Illness and death

In the summer of 1956, while on a work-related trip to the United States, Franklin first began to suspect a health problem—she found she could no longer do up her skirt because of a lump around her abdomen.[77] An operation in September of the same year revealed two tumours in her abdomen.[78] After this period and other periods of hospitalization, Franklin spent time convalescing with various friends and family members. These included Anne Sayre, Francis Crick, his wife Odile, with whom Franklin had formed a strong friendship,[79] and finally with the Roland and Nina Franklin family where Rosalind's nieces and nephews bolstered her spirits. Franklin chose not to stay with her parents because her mother's uncontrollable grief and crying upset her too much. Even while undergoing cancer treatment, Franklin continued to work, and her group continued to produce results, seven papers in 1956 and a further six in 1957.[80] In 1957, the group was also working on the polio virus and had obtained funding from the Public Health Service of the National Institutes of Health in the United States for this.[81] At the end of 1957, Franklin again fell ill and she was admitted to the Royal Marsden Hospital. She returned to work in January 1958 and she was given a promotion to Research Associate in Biophysics.[82] She fell ill again on March 30 and died on April 16, 1958, in Chelsea, London,[83][84] of bronchopneumonia, secondary carcinomatosis and carcinoma of the ovary. Exposure to X-ray radiation is sometimes considered a possible factor in her illness.[85] Other members of her family have died of cancer, and the incidence of "female" cancer is known to be disproportionately high among Ashkenazi Jews.[86] Her death certificate read: A Research Scientist, Spinster, Daughter of Ellis Arthur Franklin, a Banker.[87]

Controversies after death

Various controversies surrounding Rosalind Franklin came to light following her death.

Allegations of Sexism

Sayre states "In 1951 ... King's College as an institution, was not distinguished for the welcome that it offered to women ... Rosalind ... was unused to purdah ... there was one other woman scientist on the laboratory staff" (page 96, lines 8 to 10; page 97, line 4;page 99, footnote). Andrzej Stasiak states "Sayre's book became widely cited in feminist circles for exposing rampant sexism in science."[88] Farooq Hussain states "there were seven women in the biophysics department ... Jean Hanson became an FRS, Dame Honor B. Fell, Director of Strangeways Laboratory, supervised the biologists".[89] Maddox states, (page 134, final paragraph) "Randall ... did have many women on his staff ... they found him ... sympathetic and helpful."

Sayre states "that while the male staff at King's lunched in a large, comfortable, rather clubby dining room" the female staff of all ranks "lunched in the student's hall or away from the premises".[90][91] Elkin states that most of the MRC group typically ate lunch together (including Franklin) in the mixed dining room discussed below.[92] And Maddox states, of Randall, "He liked to see his flock, men and women, come together for morning coffee, and at lunch in the joint dining room, where he ate with them nearly every day."

Claustrophobia has been cited as an unrecognised confound to some interpersonal issues attributed to sexism.[89][93] Nevertheless, sexism is said to pervade the memoir of one peer, James Watson, in his book The Double Helix published 10 years after Franklin's death and after Watson had returned from Cambridge to Harvard.[94] In this, he denigrates her work and frequently refers to her in patronizing terms as "Rosy", a name she never used. Much later, at Cambridge, Francis Crick acknowledges, "I'm afraid we always used to adopt--let's say, a patronizing attitude towards her". And another Cambridge colleague, Peter Cavendish wrote in a letter, "Wilkins is supposed to be doing this work; Miss Franklin is evidently a fool".

Ironically, Franklin herself is said to have been "not immune to the sexism rampant in these circles; in a letter to her parents in January 1939, she called one lecturer 'very good, though female'".[95]

Contribution to the model of DNA

One of Rosalind Franklin's important contributions to the Crick and Watson model was her lecture at the seminar in November 1951, where she presented to those present, among them Watson, the two forms of the molecule, type A and type B, and her position whereby the phosphate units are located in the external part of the molecule. She also specified the amount of water to be found in the molecule in accordance with other parts of it, data that have considerable importance in terms of the stability of the molecule. Franklin was the first to discover and formulate these facts, which in fact constituted the basis for all later attempts to build a model of the molecule. The other contribution include an X-ray photograph of B-DNA (called photograph 51),[96] that was briefly shown to James Watson by Maurice Wilkins in January 1953,[97][98] and a report written for an MRC biophysics committee visit to King's in December 1952 which was shown by Dr. Max Perutz at the Cavendish Laboratory to both Crick and Watson. This MRC report contained data from the King's group, including some of Rosalind Franklin's and Raymond Gosling's work, and was given to Francis Crick — who was working on his thesis on haemoglobin structure — by his thesis supervisor Max Perutz, a member of the visiting committee.[99][100] Maurice Wilkins had been given photograph 51 by Rosalind Franklin's Ph.D. student Raymond Gosling, because she was leaving King's to work at Birkbeck. There was allegedly nothing untoward in this transfer of data to Wilkins,[101][102] since the Director Sir John Randall had insisted that all DNA work belonged exclusively to King's and had instructed Franklin in a letter to even stop thinking about it.[103] Also it was implied by Horace Freeland Judson, incorrectly, that Maurice Wilkins had taken the photograph out of Rosalind Franklin's drawer.[104] However, the B-DNA X-ray pattern photograph in question was shown to Watson by Wilkins — without Franklin's permission.

Likewise Max Perutz saw "no harm" in showing an MRC report containing the conclusions of Franklin and Gosling's X-ray data analysis to Crick, since it had not been marked as confidential, although – in the customary British manner in which everything official is considered secret until it is deliberately made public – the report was not expected to reach outside eyes".[105] Indeed after the publication of Watson's The Double Helix exposed Perutz's act, he received so many letters questioning his judgment that he felt the need to both answer them all[106] and to post a general statement in Science excusing himself on the basis of being "inexperienced and casual in administrative matters".[107]

Perutz also claimed that the MRC information was already made available to the Cambridge team when Watson had attended Franklin's seminar in November 1951. A preliminary version of much of the important material contained in the 1952 December MRC report had been presented by Franklin in a talk she had given in 1951 November, which Dr. Watson had attended but not understood.[108][109] This seems to be a rather tenuous claim. There is a significant difference between the results Franklin achieved at the end of 1951 (at the time of the seminar) and those she held when editing the report – at the end of 1952. It was a year in which her knowledge substantially increased. This and more, Watson and Crick received the report from Perutz during February, 1953, a short time after Watson received Franklin’s type B photograph, no. 51. Thus, there is no doubt that the report helped them to analyze Franklin’s correct data, which explain this and other photographs.

The Perutz letter was as said one of three letters, published with letters by Wilkins and Watson, which discussed their various contributions. Watson clarified the importance of the data obtained from the MRC report as he had not recorded these data while attending Franklin's lecture in 1951. The upshot of all this was that when Crick and Watson started to build their model in February 1953 they were working with critical parameters that had been determined by Franklin in 1951, and which she and Gosling had significantly refined in 1952, as well as with published data and other very similar data to those available at King's. Rosalind Franklin was probably never aware that her work had been used during construction of the model,[110] but Maurice Wilkins was.

Recognition of her contribution to the model of DNA

Upon the completion of their model, Francis Crick and James Watson had invited Maurice Wilkins to be a co-author of their paper describing the structure.[111][112] Wilkins turned down this offer, as he had taken no part in building the model.[113] Maurice Wilkins later expressed regret that greater discussion of co-authorship had not taken place as this might have helped to clarify the contribution the work at King's had made to the discovery.[114] There is no doubt that Franklin's experimental data were used by Crick and Watson to build their model of DNA in 1953 (see above). Some, including Maddox as cited next, have explained this citation omission by suggesting that it may be a question of circumstance, because it would have been very difficult to cite the unpublished work from the MRC report they had seen.[115] Indeed a clear timely acknowledgment would have been awkward, given the unorthodox manner in which data were transferred from King's to Cambridge, however methods were available. Watson and Crick could have cited the MRC report as a personal communication or else cited the Acta articles in press, or most easily, the third Nature paper that they knew was in press. One of the most important accomplishments of Maddox's widely acclaimed biography is that Maddox made a well-received case for inadequate acknowledgement. "Such acknowledgement as they gave her was very muted and always coupled with the name of Wilkins".[116]

Twenty five years after the fact, the first clear recitation of Franklin's contribution appeared as it permeated Watson's account, The Double Helix, although it was buried under allegations that Franklin did not know how to interpret her own data and that she should have therefore shared her work with Wilkins, Watson, and Crick. This attitude is epitomized in the confrontation between Watson and Franklin over a pre-print of Pauling's mistaken DNA manuscript.[117] Watson's words impelled Sayre to write her rebuttal, in which she designs her entire chapter nine, "Winner Take All" to be like a legal brief dissecting and analyzing the topic of acknowledgement.[118] Unfortunately Sayre's early analysis was often ignored because of the supposed feminist overtones in her book. It should be noted that in their original paper, Watson and Crick do cite the X-ray diffraction work of both Wilkins and William Astbury. In addition, they admit their, "having been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental work of [groups led by both Wilkins and Franklin]".[119] Franklin and Raymond Gosling's own publication in the same issue of Nature was the first publication of this more clarified X-ray image of DNA.[120]

Nobel Prize

The rules of the Nobel Prize forbid posthumous nominations[112] and because Rosalind Franklin had died in 1958 she was not eligible for nomination to the Nobel Prize subsequently awarded to Crick, Watson, and Wilkins in 1962.[121] The award was for their body of work on nucleic acids and not exclusively for the discovery of the structure of DNA.[122] By the time of the award Wilkins had been working on the structure of DNA for more than 10 years, and had done much to confirm the Watson-Crick model.[123] Crick had been working on the genetic code at Cambridge and Watson had worked on RNA for some years.[124]

Posthumous recognition

Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science
  • 1982, Iota Sigma Pi designated Franklin a National Honorary Member.[125]
  • 1992, English Heritage placed a blue plaque on the house Rosalind Franklin grew up in.[126]
  • 1993, King's College London rename the Orchard Residence at their Hampstead Campus on Kidderpore Avenue Rosalind Franklin Hall.
  • 1995, Newnham College dedicated a residence in her name and put a bust of her in its garden.[126]
  • 1997, Birkbeck, University of London School of Crystallography opened the Rosalind Franklin laboratory.[127]
  • 1998, National Portrait Gallery added Rosalind Franklin's next to those of Francis Crick, James Watson and Maurice Wilkins.[126][128]
  • 2000, King's College London opened the Franklin-Wilkins Building in honour of Dr. Franklin's and Professor Wilkins's work at the college.[129] King's had earlier, in 1994, also named one of the Halls in Hampstead Campus residences in memory of Rosalind Franklin.
  • 2001, The U.S. National Cancer Institute established the Rosalind E. Franklin Award for Women in Science.[130]
  • 2003, the Royal Society established the Rosalind Franklin Award, for an outstanding contribution to any area of natural science, engineering or technology.[131]
  • 2004, Finch University of Health Sciences/The Chicago Medical School, located in North Chicago, IL, changed its name to Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science.[132]
  • 2004, University of Groningen in the Netherlands installed Rosalind Franklin fellowships to promote the hiring of young, promising, female researchers.
  • 2005, the wording on the DNA sculpture (which was donated by James Watson) outside Clare College's Thirkill Court, Cambridge, UK is a) on the base: i) "These strands unravel during cell reproduction. Genes are encoded in the sequence of bases." and ii) "The double helix model was supported by the work of Rosalind Franklin and Maurice Wilkins.", as well as b) on the helices: i) "The structure of DNA was discovered in 1953 by Francis Crick and James Watson while Watson lived here at Clare." and ii) "The molecule of DNA has two helical strands that are linked by base pairs Adenine – Thymine or Guanine – Cytosine."[133]
  • 2008, Columbia University awarded an Honorary Horwitz Prize to Rosalind Franklin, Ph.D., posthumously, "for her seminal contributions to the discovery of the structure of DNA".[5]

Publications

Rosalind Franklin produced a number of publications, some cited a number of times. A representative sample is listed below. The last two publications in this list were published posthumously.

  • D.H. Bangham and Rosalind E.Franklin (1946), "Thermal expansion of coals and carbonised coals" (PDF), Transactions of the Faraday Society, 48: 289–295, doi:10.1039/TF946420B289, retrieved 14 January 2011  from The Rosalind Franklin Papers, in "Profiles in Science", at National Library of Medicine {{citation}}: |chapter= ignored (help); External link in |postscript= (help)CS1 maint: postscript (link)
  • R.E. Franklin (1949), "Note sur la structure colloidale des houilles carbonisees", Bulletin de la societe chimique de France, 16 (1, 2): D53–D54  Citation count 0{{citation}}: CS1 maint: postscript (link)
  • R.E. Franklin (1950), "On the structure of carbon" (PDF), Journal de Chimie Physique et de Physico-Chimie Biologique, 47 (5, 6): 573–575, retrieved 14 January 2011  Per National Library of Medicine above. Citation count 16. Note: this journal ceased publication in 1999 {{citation}}: External link in |postscript= (help)CS1 maint: postscript (link)
  • R.E. Franklin (1950), "The interpretation of diffuse X-ray diagrams of carbon", Acta Crystallographica, 3 (2): 107–121, doi:10.1107/S0365110X50000264   Citation count 245. (In this article, Franklin cites Moffitt){{citation}}: CS1 maint: postscript (link)
  • R.E. Franklin (1950), "Influence of the bonding electrons on the scattering of X-rays by carbon", Nature, 165 (4185): 71–72, doi:10.1038/165071a0  citation count 11{{citation}}: CS1 maint: postscript (link)
  • R.E. Franklin (1951), "Les carbones graphitisables et non-graphitisables", Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Seances de l'Academie des Sciences, Presented by G. Rimbaud, session of 3rd January, 1951, 232 (3): 232–234  Citation count 7{{citation}}: CS1 maint: postscript (link)
  • G.E. Bacon and R.E. Franklin (1951), "The alpha dimension of graphite", Acta Crystallographica, 4 (6): 561–562  Citation count 8{{citation}}: CS1 maint: postscript (link)
  • R.E. Franklin (1953), "Graphitizing and non-graphitizing carbons, their formation, structure and properties", Angewandte Chemie, 65 (13): 353–353  Citation count 0{{citation}}: CS1 maint: postscript (link)
  • R.E. Franklin (1953), "The role of water in the structure of graphitic acid", Journal de Chimie Physique et de Physico-Chimie Biologique, 50: C26
  • R.E. Franklin (1953), "Graphitizing and nongraphitizing carbon compounds. Formation, structure and characteristics", Brenstoff-Chemie, 34: 359–361
  • R.E. Franklin and M. Mering (1954), "La structure de l'acide graphitique", Acta Crystallographica, 7 (10): 661–661  (5 lines)Citation count 0{{citation}}: CS1 maint: postscript (link)
  • Rosalind E. Franklina and A. Klug (1956), "The nature of the helical groove on the tobacco mosaic virus particle X-ray diffraction studies", Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 19 (3): 403–416, doi:10.1016/0006-3002(56)90463-2, PMID 13315300

Footnotes

  1. ^ a b c The Rosalind Franklin Papers. The Holes in Coal: Research at BCURA and in Paris, 1942-1951, Profiles in Science, Documents. National Library of Medicine, [1].
  2. ^ Maddox
  3. ^ Sayre
  4. ^ Elkin
  5. ^ Maddox, page 138, lines 9 and 10
  6. ^ GRO Register of Births: SEP 1920 1a 250 KENSINGTON – Rosalind E. Franklin, mmn = Waley
  7. ^ Maddox, Brenda (2002), Rosalind Franklin: The Dark Lady of DNA, HarperCollins, ISBN 0060184078
  8. ^ Maddox p. 7
  9. ^ Segev p.
  10. ^ Sayre,A,. Rosalind Franklin and DNA(New York:Norton,1975). p. 31
  11. ^ a b Maddox p. 40
  12. ^ Maddox p. 25
  13. ^ Sayre p. 41
  14. ^ Maddox p. 30
  15. ^ Maddox, p. 26
  16. ^ Maddox, p. 20
  17. ^ Sayre, p. 35
  18. ^ R.N. Dixon, D.M. Agar and R.E. Burge, William Charles Price. 1 April 1909-10 March 1993, Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, vol. 43, page 438, line 17, 1997.
  19. ^ Fact sheet: Women at Cambridge: A Chronology, [2].
  20. ^ Rosalind Franklin, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory's Dolan DNA Learning Center, ID 1649, [3].
  21. ^ D. W. van Krevelen, Coal, Third Edition: Typology - Physics - Chemistry - Constitution, Elsevier, New York, 1993.
  22. ^ Chemistry and Physics of Carbon, vol 1--, 1968--, Elsevier, New York.
  23. ^ G. Terriere, A. Oberlin, J. Mering, Oxidation of graphite in liquid medium -- observations by means of microscopy and electron diffraction, Carbon, 5, 431--, 1967.
  24. ^ Maddox, p. 124
  25. ^ Maddox, p. 114
  26. ^ Wilkins, Wilkins, M., The Third Man of the Double Helix, an autobiography (2003) Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp. 143–144
  27. ^ The Dark Lady Of DNA by Branda Maddox
  28. ^ Wilkins, p. 121
  29. ^ Maddox, pp. 149–150, Elkin, p 45. Elkin, L.O. Rosalind Franklin and the Double Helix. Physics Today, March 2003(available free on-line, see references). Olby, R. The Path to the Double Helix (London: MacMillan, 1974).
  30. ^ Sayre, Olby, Maddox, Elkin, Wilkins
  31. ^ Maddox, p. 129
  32. ^ Elkin, p. 43
  33. ^ Wilkins p. 155
  34. ^ Elkin p. 45
  35. ^ a b Maddox, p. 153
  36. ^ Wilkins, p. 154
  37. ^ Maddox p 155
  38. ^ a b Wilkins, p. 158
  39. ^ Maddox, p. 155
  40. ^ a b Wilkins, p. 176
  41. ^ Wilkins, p. 182
  42. ^ a b Maddox, p. 168
  43. ^ Maddox, p. 169
  44. ^ Wilkins, pp. 232–233
  45. ^ Franklin, R.E. and Gosling, R.G. authors of papers received 6 March 1953 Acta Cryst. (1953). 6, 673 The Structure of Sodium Thymonucleate Fibres I. The Influence of Water Content Acta Cryst. (1953). 6, 678 The Structure of Sodium Thymonucleate Fibres II. The Cylindrically Symmetrical Patterson Function
  46. ^ Maddox p 205
  47. ^ Acta Cryst. (1953). 6, 673 The Structure of Sodium Thymonucleate Fibres I. The Influence of Water Content
  48. ^ Klug, A. "Rosalind Franklin and the Double Helix", Nature 248 (26 April 1974): 787–788
  49. ^ Klug, A. Rosalind Franklin and the Discovery of the Structure of DNA, Nature 219 (24 August 1968): 808–810 & 843.
  50. ^ Yockey, pp. 9–10
  51. ^ Crick's 31 December 1961 letter to Jacque Monod cited above
  52. ^ Maddox, p. 147
  53. ^ Maddox, p. 161
  54. ^ Photograph was taken in the same series of photographs taken by Franklin's colleague John Finch, as the one shown of Franklin's Birkbeck desk that was reproduced by Maddox. Author Lynne Elkin was given a complete set and was informed by Finch that he had given a complete set to Maddox.
  55. ^ Hubbard, Ruth (1990), The Politics of Women's Biology, Rutgers State University, p. 60, ISBN 0-8135-1490-8
  56. ^ "The Double Helix" p. 115
  57. ^ "The Double Helix" p. 60
  58. ^ "All hands to the pump" letter is preserved in the Crick archives at the University of California, San Diego, and was posted as part of their Web collection. It is also quoted by both Maddox, p 204, and Olby.
  59. ^ Maddox p. 207
  60. ^ In contrast to his other letters to Crick, Wilkins dated this one.
  61. ^ "Old rogues" letter is preserved in the Crick archives at the University of California at San Diego, and was posted as part of their Web collection. It is also quoted by both Maddox, p. 208 and Olby.
  62. ^ Maddox, p. 212
  63. ^ Franklin and Gosling (1953)
  64. ^ Maddox, p. 210
  65. ^ 10 April 1953 Franklin post card to Crick asking permission to view model. The original is in the Crick archives at the University of California, San Diego.
  66. ^ Holt, J. (2002)
  67. ^ Maddox, p. 235
  68. ^ Maddox, p. 229
  69. ^ Maddox, p. 249
  70. ^ Franklin (1955)
  71. ^ Maddox, p. 252
  72. ^ Maddox, p. 254
  73. ^ Maddox, p. 256
  74. ^ Maddox, p. 262
  75. ^ Maddox, p. 269
  76. ^ Franklin (1956)
  77. ^ Maddox, p. 284
  78. ^ Maddox, p. 285
  79. ^ Maddox, p. 288
  80. ^ Maddox, p. 292
  81. ^ Maddox, p. 296
  82. ^ Maddox, p. 302
  83. ^ GRO Register of Deaths: JUN 1958 5c 257 CHELSEA – Rosalind E. Franklin, aged 37
  84. ^ Maddox, pp. 305–307
  85. ^ "Defending Franklin's Legacy". Secret of Photo 51. NOVA. Retrieved 10 November 2010.Along with genetic predisposition; opinion of CSU's Lynne Osman Elkin; see also March 2003 Physics Today
  86. ^ Maddox, p.320
  87. ^ Maddox, p.307
  88. ^ Andrzej Stasiak, Rosalind Franklin, EMBO reports 2, 3, 181 (2001) doi:10.1093/embo-reports/kve037 [4]
  89. ^ a b Hussain, Farooq (November 20, 1975), "Did Rosalind Franklin deserve DNA Nobel prize?", New Scientist, 68 (976): 470, retrieved 10 January 2011
  90. ^ Sayre, p.97
  91. ^ Bryson, B. (2004) p. 490
  92. ^ Elkin, p.45
  93. ^ Smithers, David (5 August 1978), "Crossing boundaries", British Medical Journal, (review of A Century of DNA: A History of the Discovery of the Structure and Function of the Genetic Substance), 2 (6134): 422–423, doi:10.1136/bmj.2.717.422-c, PMC 1609067 {{citation}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  94. ^ Harding, Sandra (2006), "Sexist criticism of Watson's memoir", Science and Social Inequality: Feminist and Postcolonial Issues, Urbana: University of Illinois Press, p. 71, ISBN 978-0-252-03060-4, retrieved 10 January 2011  Paperback ISBN 978-0-252-07304-5 {{citation}}: External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: postscript (link)
  95. ^ Wertheimer, Michael (2007), "The Case of the Purloined Picture: Rosalind Franklin and the Keystone of the Double Helix", in Gavin, Eileen A; Clamar, Aphrodite; Siderits, Mary Anne (eds.), Women of Vision: Their Psychology, Circumstances, and Successes, New York: Springer, ISBN 978-0-8261-0253-9, retrieved 10 January 2011  Rosalind's letter quoted {{citation}}: External link in |chapterurl= and |postscript= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: postscript (link)
  96. ^ Maddox, pp. 177–178
  97. ^ Maddox, p. 196
  98. ^ Crick, (1988) p. 67.
  99. ^ Elkin, L.O. (2003)p 44
  100. ^ Maddox, pp. 198–199
  101. ^ Maddox, pp. 196
  102. ^ Wilkins, p. 198
  103. ^ Maddox p.312,
  104. ^ Wilkins, p. 257
  105. ^ Maddox p.188
  106. ^ Perutz's papers are in the Archive of the J. Craig Venter institute and Science Foundation in Rockville Maryland, which were purchased as part of the Jeremy Norman Archive of Molecular Biology; quoted in Ferry, Georgina, 2007. Max Perutz and the Secret of Life. Published in the UK by Chatto & Windus (ISBN 0-701-17695-4), and in the USA by the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
  107. ^ "Science, 27 June 1969, pp. 207–212, also reprinted in the Norton critical edition of The Double Helix, edited by Gunther Stent.
  108. ^ Maddox, p. 199
  109. ^ Watson (1969).
  110. ^ Maddox, p. 316
  111. ^ Wilkins, p. 213
  112. ^ a b Maddox, p. 205
  113. ^ Wilkins, p. 214
  114. ^ Wilkins, p. 226
  115. ^ Maddox, p. 207
  116. ^ Maddox, pp316–317, and other parts of the epilogue
  117. ^ Watson, J.D. (1968) pp. 95–96
  118. ^ Sayre,A. (1975) pp. 156–167
  119. ^ Watson JD, Crick FHC (1953). "A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid". Nature 171: 737–738. Full text PDF This article was immediately followed by the two King's submissions: M.H.F. Wilkins, A.R. Stokes, and H.R. Wilson. Molecular Structure of Deoxypentose Nucleic Acids, pp738–740 then by: Rosalind E. Franklin and R.G. Gosling. Molecular configuration of Sodium Thymonucleate pp 740–741.
  120. ^ Franklin R, Gosling RG (1953) "Molecular Configuration in Sodium Thymonucleate". Nature 171: 740–741. Full text PDF
  121. ^ Nobel Prize (1962)
  122. ^ Wilkins, p. 242
  123. ^ Wilkins, p. 240
  124. ^ Wilkins, p. 243
  125. ^ Iota Sigma Pi professional awards recipients
  126. ^ a b c Maddox, p. 322
  127. ^ Sir Aaron Klug opens new Laboratory
  128. ^ NPG pictures
  129. ^ Maddox, p. 323
  130. ^ "seventh annual Rosalind E. Franklin Award for Women in Cancer Research at the National Cancer Institute's Intramural Scientific Retreat [which] honors the commitment of women in cancer research and is given in tribute to chemist Rosalind Franklin, who played a critical role in the discovery of the DNA double helix." The JHU Gazette, Johns Hopkins University, March 17, 2008 For the Record: Cheers
  131. ^ The Royal Society Rosalind Franklin Award (2003): The Royal Society web page. Retrieved 21 July 2006.
  132. ^ Dedication of Rosalind Franklin University
  133. ^ "Secret of life revisited". Cambridge News. 9 November 2005. Retrieved 1 November 2010.

References

  • Bryson, B. A Short History of Nearly Everything. (2004). Black Swan ISBN 0-552-99704-8.
  • Crick, F., H., C. and Watson, J., D. Molecular structure of nucleic acids (1953) Nature 171 pp. 737–738.
  • Crick, F. H. C. What Mad Pursuit, (1988). Basic Books. ISBN 0-465-09137-7.
  • Elkin, L., O. Rosalind Franklin and the Double Helix Physics Today March 2003, pp. 42–48.
  • Franklin RE (1950), "Influence of the bonding electrons on the scattering of X-rays by carbon", Nature, 165 (4185): 71, doi:10.1038/165071a0, PMID 15403103. {{citation}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  • Ferry, Georgina, 2007. Max Perutz and the Secret of Life. Published in the UK by Chatto & Windus (ISBN 0-701-17695-4), and in the USA by the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
  • Franklin, R.E. and Gosling, R.G. (April 25, 1953), "Molecular Configuration in Sodium Thymonucleate" (PDF), Nature, 171 (4356): 740–741, doi:10.1038/171740a0, PMID 13054694, retrieved 15 January 2011  Reprint also available at Resonance Classics {{citation}}: External link in |postscript= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: postscript (link)
  • Franklin, R.E. and Gosling, R.G. authors of papers received 6 March 1953: Acta Cryst. (1953). 6, 673 The Structure of Sodium Thymonucleate Fibres I. The Influence of Water Content II. The Cylindrically Symmetrical Patterson Function
  • Franklin, R.E. (1955), "Structure of tobacco mosaic virus", Nature, 175 (4452): 379–381, doi:10.1038/175379a0, PMID 14356181
  • Franklin, R.E. (1956) "Location of the ribonucleic acid in the tobacco mosaic virus particle." Nature 177:928.
  • Holt, J. (2002) "Photo Finish: Rosalind Franklin and the great DNA race" The New Yorker October
  • Judson, Horace Freeland, "The Eighth Day of Creation:Makers of the Revolution in Biology" ( London: Jonathan Cape,1979),Penguin,1995;expanded edition;New York:Cold Spring Harbor Press,1996).
  • Maddox, B. Rosalind Franklin: The Dark Lady of DNA (2002). Harper Collins ISBN 0-00-655211-0.
  • Nobel Prize (1962). The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1962, for their discoveries concerning the molecular structure of nucleic acids and its significance for information transfer in living material, Nobelprize.org
  • Olby, R., "The Path to the Double Helix"(London:Macmillan,1974)
  • Sayre, A. 1975. Rosalind Franklin and DNA. New York: W.W. Norton and Company. ISBN 0-393-32044-8.
  • Segev, T. One Palestine, Complete, (2000) (ISBN 0-349-11286-X) Abacus History.
  • Stent, Gunther, editor. "Critical Edition of The Double Helix"(1980) W.W. Norton Co, New York and London. ISBN 0-393-95075-1.
  • Watson, J. Letter to Science, 164, p. 1539, 27 (1969).
  • Wilkins, M., The Third Man of the Double Helix, an autobiography (2003) Oxford University Press, Oxford. ISBN 0-19-280667-X.
  • Yockey, H. P. Information Theory, Evolution, and the Origin of Life (2005).

Further reading

  • Brown, Andrew; "J. D. Bernal: The Sage of Science", Oxford University Press, 2005; ISBN 0-199-20565-5
  • Chomet, S. (Ed.), D.N.A. Genesis of a Discovery. Newman-Hemisphere Press (1994): NB a few copies are available from Newman-Hemisphere at 101 Swan Court, London SW3 5RY (phone/fax: 07092 060530).
  • Crick, Francis (1988) "What Mad Pursuit: A Personal View of Scientific Discovery" (Basic Books reprint edition, 1990) ISBN 0-465-09138-5
  • Dickerson, Richard E.; "Present at the Flood: How Structural Molecular Biology Came About", Sinauer, 2005; ISBN 0-878-93168-6
  • John Finch; 'A Nobel Fellow On Every Floor', Medical Research Council 2008, 381 pp, ISBN 978-1840469-40-0; this book is all about the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge
  • Hager, Thomas; "Force of Nature: The Life of Linus Pauling", Simon & Schuster 1995; ISBN 0-684-80909-5
  • Freeland Judson, Horace (1996) [1977], The Eighth Day of Creation: Makers of the Revolution in Biology (Expanded ed.), Plainview, N.Y: CSHL Press, ISBN 0-87969-478-5
  • Glynn, Jennifer Franklin. "Rosalind Franklin, 1920–1958" in "Cambridge Women: Twelve Portraits" (CUP 1996) pp 267 – 282 eds. Edward Shils and Carmen Blacker, ISBN 0521482879
  • Klug, A. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography article on R.E. Franklin, OUP, Matthew H.C.G. Ed., first published Sept 2004; online edn, Jan 2007, 1840 words; ISBN 019861411X; was selected "Life of The Day" on 16 April 2008 (50th anniversary of her death).
  • Klug, A. A lecture about Rosalind Franklin's contribution to the elucidation of the structure of DNA. in DNA Changing Science and Society: The Darwin Lectures for 2003 Krude, Torsten (Ed.) CUP (2003)
  • Olby, Robert, (1972) 'Rosalind Elsie Franklin' biography in "Dictionary of Scientific Biography", ed. Charles C. Gillespie (New York: Charles Scribner's sons) ISBN: ISBN 0684101211
  • Olby, Robert, The Path to The Double Helix: Discovery of DNA, (1974). MacMillan ISBN 0-486-68117-3
  • "Quiet debut for the double helix" by Professor Robert Olby, Nature 421 (January 23, 2003): 402–405.
  • Tait, Sylvia & James "A Quartet of Unlikely Discoveries" (Athena Press 2004) ISBN 184401343X
  • Watson, James D. (1980), The double helix: A personal account of the discovery of the structure of DNA, Norton, ISBN 0-393-01245-X
  • Wilkins, Maurice, "The Third Man of The Double Helix", OUP 2003; ISBN 978-0-19-280667-3.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Rosalind Franklin.

Articles

Documentaries

Plays

  • [6], "Photograph 51" by Anna Ziegler was most recently presented at Ensemble Studio Theatre in New York City from October 27-November 21, 2010.

Collections and publications

Template:Persondata

Template:Link FA Template:Link FA

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rosalind_Franklin&oldid=416945988"