Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
ElBufon (talk | contribs)
Line 76: Line 76:
It's over 60k, so if you feel up to a challenge, jump on in! Thank you! -- [[User:Screwball23|<font color="0000EE">Sc</font><font color="4169E1">r</font><font color="00B2EE">ew</font><font color="FF6600">ba</font><font color="FFFF00">ll</font><font color="9400D3">23</font>]] [[User talk:Screwball23|talk]] 03:30, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
It's over 60k, so if you feel up to a challenge, jump on in! Thank you! -- [[User:Screwball23|<font color="0000EE">Sc</font><font color="4169E1">r</font><font color="00B2EE">ew</font><font color="FF6600">ba</font><font color="FFFF00">ll</font><font color="9400D3">23</font>]] [[User talk:Screwball23|talk]] 03:30, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
:penny...pound...on it. [[User:Lfstevens|Lfstevens]] ([[User talk:Lfstevens|talk]]) 05:47, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
:penny...pound...on it. [[User:Lfstevens|Lfstevens]] ([[User talk:Lfstevens|talk]]) 05:47, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

===[[Siege of Badajoz (1658)]]===
Hello, I wrote this article and nominated it to be a good one. Unfortunately I'm not an English native speaker and the prose isn't good enough. Please, I need help to resolve this problem in less than seven days. Thank you so much. --[[User:ElBufon|ElBufon]] ([[User talk:ElBufon|talk]]) 06:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:15, 2 March 2011

Guild of Copy Editors' requests page

On this page, you can request that the Guild of Copy Editors copy-edit specific articles.

Instructions for requesters

To make a request, remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article, then click this button and follow the instructions:

Please remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article to avoid edit conflicts during the copy edit.

Please note:

  • No request by an unregistered editor will be accepted unless the IP has done significant work on the article. Drive-by IP requests already on the list may be declined by any editor.
  • The average waiting time is two or so months. Please be patient and feel free to improve your requested article while you wait.
  • If you plan to nominate the article for good article, A-class or featured article status, please wait until the copy edit is complete before nominating it.
  • Having your article copy edited by our team does not guarantee that the prose will be considered acceptable during any of the above reviews.
  • You may have up to two open requests at any one time. This is enforced so that every request can have a fair chance of being fulfilled within a reasonable period.

Requests may be declined if the article is:




February 2011

A DYK nominee expanded from 819 B to 21KB readable prose and a GAN nominee that gets copyediting to meet GA standards.--Redtigerxyz Talk 18:13, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Doing...--Aichikawa (talk) 02:12, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another GA which needs a copyedit. --TIAYN (talk) 22:53, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Doing... Bobnorwal (talk) 16:24, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An old GA. --TIAYN (talk) 16:11, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An article that has been improving over time, and needs to get copyedited. Its an article aboud a soccerclub in swedens highest divsion. SYRIANIEN (talk) 22:48, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Doing...--Aichikawa (talk) 02:12, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've gotten this article up to GA-class, but before attempting an A-class review (or FA nomination), I'd like to get it copy edited by someone in the GOCE. Thanks! --Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû (blah?) 18:28, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's not specifically tagged for anything; I'd just like to have someone give it a look-over prior to moving on. --Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû (blah?) 18:29, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think Dank may have finished it - have left message to clarify Chaosdruid (talk) 23:49, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article is already at A-class and will be going to FAC in the near future. Brad (talk) 14:59, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Working Chaosdruid (talk) 01:27, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Going for FA! --Perseus8235 16:07, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A good quality article, needs a copyedit to help push it further. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 22:26, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Doing... -Pax85 (talk) 17:42, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done - Pax85 (talk) 05:45, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I recently expanded this article about about The Bloodhound Gang album. I'd like to get it promoted to GA Class, but I feel it needs some copy-editing to cut down on delays. Any help would be great! Gen. Quon (talk) 00:36, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article has recently passed USRD's ACR and GAN, and I would like some final polishing before shipping to FAC. --AdmrBoltz 05:46, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a GA, but a copyedit could push it further along the road to FA. 108.69.80.49 (talk) 12:53, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article recently passed a GA nomination, and currently is on review for FA. The main problem are copy-edits.--Gduwen (talk) 16:26, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Current FAC, some comments on the grammar and flow being improved. Tærkast (Communicate) 20:16, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Working - Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:08, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Created on 1 March; it's need a decent copyedit, rewording of akward sentences and many other things. Can someone please do a thorough copyedit of this article? If so thanks! --TIAYN (talk) 14:41, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Following a major expansion, this BLP article is currently a DYK nominee and will benefit from a copy-edit with an eye for sentence structure, style, and overall flow. Many thanks for your help. Regards, Cinosaur (talk) 16:57, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know about you guys, but I've edited this article up and down for months. I desperately need a fresh perspective to take this article to the next level. Some of the information is out of chronological order, and some of its tenses could use a change from the present to the past. There is a huge swath of information that was lost from edit wars with deletionist editors, so be forewarned that missing context may exist in places. Other parts just need a deep copy-edit to enhance the page's readability.

It's over 60k, so if you feel up to a challenge, jump on in! Thank you! -- Screwball23 talk 03:30, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

penny...pound...on it. Lfstevens (talk) 05:47, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I wrote this article and nominated it to be a good one. Unfortunately I'm not an English native speaker and the prose isn't good enough. Please, I need help to resolve this problem in less than seven days. Thank you so much. --ElBufon (talk) 06:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]