Jump to content

Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention/Bot: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Bot-reported: comment
Line 39: Line 39:
::* The string '''nazi''' has a comment associated with it:Usernames that promote a controversial or potentially inflammatory point of view may be in violation of the username policy due to creating a hostile editing environment; but some real names contain the string "nazi" - especially names from the Middle East - be careful that this is not the case before blocking. [[User:SoxBot|SoxBot]] ([[User talk:SoxBot|talk]]) 02:07, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
::* The string '''nazi''' has a comment associated with it:Usernames that promote a controversial or potentially inflammatory point of view may be in violation of the username policy due to creating a hostile editing environment; but some real names contain the string "nazi" - especially names from the Middle East - be careful that this is not the case before blocking. [[User:SoxBot|SoxBot]] ([[User talk:SoxBot|talk]]) 02:07, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
:::{{UAA|c}} Depends, I guess, on how many people get [[Soup Nazi|the reference]]. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 02:10, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
:::{{UAA|c}} Depends, I guess, on how many people get [[Soup Nazi|the reference]]. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 02:10, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
::::NO SOUP FOR YOU! [[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 02:16, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:16, 22 January 2011

Bot controls:

  • The string called IP address has a comment associated with it:The pattern of numbers in the name resembles an IP address. IP addresses may be potentially be used to identify people and their presence in names may be considered disruptive. SoxBot (talk) 22:48, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Being discussed with the user. Daniel Case (talk) 15:57, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Matches the regular expression called Homoglyph of cock. The portion that matched was Cock.
  • This filter attempts to see past the use of similar looking characters and creative substitutions, see Homoglyphs.
  • The string called Homoglyph of cock is prone to false positives, please take extra care ensuring this name is actually a violation before blocking. SoxBot (talk) 22:54, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wait until the user edits. Lord Porchcrop POWER 08:07, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Matches the literal pattern kkk.
  • The string kkk is prone to false positives, please take extra care ensuring this name is actually a violation before blocking.
  • This report was delayed until the user edited. (Note: If the bot made a mistake and it reported a user without them editing, please notify X!)
  • Debugging stuff: 1 (if you are not X!, just ignore this) SoxBot (talk) 15:20, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. With that many K's, it's not a problem, but edits are clearly promotional. Daniel Case (talk) 23:27, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Matches the regular expression called Top level domain. The portion that matched was .La.
  • When using the name Bouche.La (link)' as a http URL I got a response code of '.
  • The string called Top level domain has a comment associated with it:Please check whether this name is promoting a Web site. Names may coincidentally resemble URLs or point to parked domains so take care.
  • This report was delayed until the user edited. (Note: If the bot made a mistake and it reported a user without them editing, please notify X!)
  • Debugging stuff: 1 (if you are not X!, just ignore this) SoxBot (talk) 19:14, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. No website at address; edits otherwise good. Daniel Case (talk) 23:39, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Matches the literal pattern whitey.
  • This report was delayed until the user edited. (Note: If the bot made a mistake and it reported a user without them editing, please notify X!)
  • Debugging stuff: 1 (if you are not X!, just ignore this) SoxBot (talk) 20:00, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. May not edit again, I imagine. Daniel Case (talk) 23:41, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Matches the literal pattern nazi.
  • The string nazi has a comment associated with it:Usernames that promote a controversial or potentially inflammatory point of view may be in violation of the username policy due to creating a hostile editing environment; but some real names contain the string "nazi" - especially names from the Middle East - be careful that this is not the case before blocking. SoxBot (talk) 02:07, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Depends, I guess, on how many people get the reference. Daniel Case (talk) 02:10, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
NO SOUP FOR YOU! Beeblebrox (talk) 02:16, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]