User talk:David.osborne1: Difference between revisions

With Regards to the above article, rather than create a new article why not use your user page which is intended to be used for personal information. Biographys such as yours are not permitted on Wikipedia. Regards Thatguy69 07:52, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is an appropriate post for wikipedia.. IMHO

David David.osborne1 09:56, 25 April 2007 (UTC)david.osborne1[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you.--Bongwarrior 09:08, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow or move it unilaterally while discussion about it is underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. --Bongwarrior 09:20, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:NOT. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and it is not a breeding ground for whatever you want to post here. There are other websites that you can use to post personal opinions, such as MySpace or LiveJournal. Thanks, Nishkid64 (talk) 16:39, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have deleted your userpage because Wikipedia is not a blog. I have also deleted the article David Charles Osborne which was a redirect to your userpage for the same reason. Please contact me if you have any questions about these deletions. Pascal.Tesson 05:55, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Zurvita, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.zurvita.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:56, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Zurvita requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 08:57, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 09:02, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A page you created, GOOOH Florida, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is a test page. Use the sandbox for testing.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 13:38, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: You are welcome to recreate the article, though you will probably need to establish why the Florida chapter is notable enough to warrant an article separate from the GOOOH article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:41, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on GOOOH Florida, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.    Thorncrag   03:12, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Whereas GOOOH in general has questionable notability, you will have a tough time having an independent article for a local chapter, especially one which has no information or assertion of importance. Further, an article which has one brief sentence but lists links will be interpreted as spam. I would suggest merging the Florida chapter into the GOOOH article.    Thorncrag   03:14, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see you marked the GOOOH page for deletion requesting additional sources. I am the GOOOH Florida Director and I have tried TWICE to create a GOOOH Florida page, and suggest that all 50 State Directors create a GOOOH - "state" page as well.

The NATIONAL Goooh Organization is somewhat of a "new political party" but not in the traditional sense since the National Party has no agenda and each candidate in each of the 435 CONGRESSIONAL districts is able to define their own platform.

This is significant on its own merit, the State director is the "key leader" in each State who has the responsibility to find/appoint district leaders and partner with other grass roots political organizations to bring ALL citizens into the GOOOH process.... regardless of their position on ANY issue.

Please allow me to create a GOOOH Florida page. I am not a WIKI expert but I am sure that there are several in our organization that can take on the task of starting an appropriate page for each State. David.osborne1 (talk) 15:11, 23 October 2010 (UTC) David.osborne1 (talk) 15:13, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]