User talk:Coren: Difference between revisions

I've put a note on the discussion page. In this case Yale was repeating a standard paragraph that has appeared in most of the lectures they've published since around 1906 and therefore before copyright. Chris55 (talk) 07:01, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have now been informed by User:Theleftorium that I should have put a source-attribution template on the page in question. This was not obvious from the message the searchbot left nor from the Copyright page that it directed me to. I've done it now, but could I suggest that you add something to the message left by the bot to help in cases such as this. Chris55 (talk) 09:30, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I wrote new page for Prof. Zwi Segal, I have the same text in several pages over the web, also in his partners company sites as his profile,

Please advice what I need to do

Thanks in advanced

Shahar Matorin 972-54-5205555 shahar@mianou.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smatorin (talk • contribs) 18:03, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just started the page on Sauber Petronas Engineering by copying some information from Sauber, but my intention was to add to the page fairly quickly. Shouldn't it be OK to work like that? John Anderson (talk) 08:40, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looking over this talkpage and Stražbenica (Banovići) which was tagged on a user talkpage, it appears that your Bot is off. ----moreno oso (talk) 15:13, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see that the bot did anything wrong there. Can you describe the problem, please? Hipocrite (talk) 15:17, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is my second visit to this page and if you can't see it, you're missing the forest from the trees. Any Stub class article can almost directly be considered a copyvio if the rule is rigidly enforced or looked at. Seeing other editors visit this page describing similar tagging should be enough of a description. ----moreno oso (talk) 15:20, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Er, did you see what the bot tagged? The article was a copy-paste of another stub - it was actually the same article. The author did exactly what the search-bot suggested - redirected the article to to the other stub. Hipocrite (talk) 15:22, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am the owner of http://www.mynahasgone.com and all its content therefore I think that this article in wikipedia is not a copyright violation. However, I've written a new article without infringing material, in the following temporary subpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Magina3/Sonia_Escolano/Temp Please, I wish this issue can be cleaning soon. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Magina3 (talk • contribs) 17:33, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This page is not plaigerizing louisvilleswim.org, since the section the bot is referring to is simply a listing of events, which cannot be written any other way. The source of information is http://www.eteamz.com/louisvilleswim Ayoazorwich17 (talk) 22:24, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know that voting has begun, but having observed the behavior on the article and on ANI and elsewhere since the workshop more or less ended, I believe that proposing some more significant remedies is necessary. These people are not going to work together in the future.

Thanks. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 23:16, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The [Take Ivy] page was labeled as copyright infringement and I think the bot was mistaken as the date I see is 2nd of July. Please advise. Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wainblatrobert (talk • contribs) 13:27, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

False alarm by the bot [1] Sf5xeplus (talk) 01:32, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another false positive on Maria Astrologes. Tewapack (talk) 04:54, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Your bot noted the faults on my new page and although I've sorted them I didn't want to get rid of the warning without asking first. Thanks koocl