User talk:72.14.169.158: Difference between revisions

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Algae has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Winchelsea (talk) 18:13, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Metonymy has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  – iridescent 19:16, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Matt Wong has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. —^ossmanntalk 19:10, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear 72.14.169.158,
Some of your edits on the page March 1 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 15:21, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Rhinoceros Party of Canada has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. StaticGull  Talk  14:25, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Maslives has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. GDonato (talk) 12:59, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to David Gilmour has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alexius08 (talk) 12:18, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Pierre-Esprit Radisson has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 18:51, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Grey matter constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Sionus [talk] 19:30, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear 72.14.169.158,
Some of your edits on the page 1995 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 15:13, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Supersaturation has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Nsaa (talk) 14:39, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear 72.14.169.158,
Some of your edits on the page December 7 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 16:05, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to The Powerpuff Girls has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Mygerardromance (talk) 21:41, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to The Powerpuff Girls constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.  – iridescent 21:44, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Rising Authority. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alansohn (talk) 21:48, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Salmonella has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Adrian 1001 (talk) 16:42, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Salmonella. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- MarcoTolo (talk) 21:42, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Matt Henderson has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 23:52, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Matt Henderson constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 23:53, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Matt Henderson. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Mygerardromance (talk) 23:56, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Matt Henderson. Mygerardromance (talk) 23:57, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Jules Verne has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. κaτaʟaveno^T_C 15:25, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Orange (word) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 16:11, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Smurfs, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Smurfs was changed by 72.14.169.158 (u) (t) deleting 28828 characters on 2009-01-22T18:00:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:00, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Beaver constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Rich Farmbrough, 18:00 22 January 2009 (UTC). 18:00, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to The Smurfs. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. JForget 18:02, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 24 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. --JForget 18:46, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite 20:21, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Romance (genre) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Dougofborg (talk) 13:26, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Armistice, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Armistice was changed by 72.14.169.158 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-02-12T19:04:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Armistice, you will be blocked from editing. QueenCake (talk) 23:09, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of Reborn! characters, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of Reborn! characters was changed by 72.14.169.158 (u) (t) score equals -39973 on 2009-02-18T03:04:12+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:04, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to the page List of Reborn! characters constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. -- Mentifisto 03:07, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Sharon Creelman. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. -- Mentifisto 03:10, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Romance (genre), you will be blocked from editing. HubHikari (talk) 01:51, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.