Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anton Long: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→[[Anton Long]]: delete |
→[[Anton Long]]: Delete |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*'''Delete''' per nom. If the organization isn't notable enough the keep, then it follows that an individual whose notability is tied to that organization should not be kept. -- <i>[[User:Aylahs|Aylahs]] <sup>[[User talk:Aylahs|(talk)]]</sup></i> 05:18, 11 January 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' per nom. If the organization isn't notable enough the keep, then it follows that an individual whose notability is tied to that organization should not be kept. -- <i>[[User:Aylahs|Aylahs]] <sup>[[User talk:Aylahs|(talk)]]</sup></i> 05:18, 11 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
* '''Delete''' per Aylahs [[User:Firefoxman|FirefoxMan]] 17:42, 11 January 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:42, 11 January 2007
The organization he is head of was deleted via AfD, the individual doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO and the article doesn't appear to meet WP:V. Tunnels of Set 00:58, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Keep Although not extreamly notable, the article is well referenced. He also doesnt seem to out-right offend WP:BIO either. However it wouldn't torture me to see it go.Ganfon 01:35, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. If the organization isn't notable enough the keep, then it follows that an individual whose notability is tied to that organization should not be kept. -- Aylahs (talk) 05:18, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per Aylahs FirefoxMan 17:42, 11 January 2007 (UTC)