User talk:Krano: Difference between revisions

Please note: I am not a bot. I use huggle, which allows me to make a lot of edits in a short amount time. I will answer your message after I am done . Thank you.

Template:Useronline

Template:Archive box collapsible

I respect your demand for a reference (Which I've now done) but you have to understand that this way of thinking denies local indigenous history and is an example of ongoing colonization.

I have removed your comment about Mark Bernstein on User talk:Jimbo Wales. Mark contacted me to complain that it was inaccurate and defamatory. I make no claim or accusation about whether or not it actually is, but I thought it in the best interests of BLP and the encyclopedia to remove it. I ask that you voluntarily not restore it lest we inflame a very sensitive and contentious issue. Thank you. Gamaliel (talk) 19:28, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Gamaliel:I sincerely protest this removal

1. he posted this in his blog post In other news, the Wikimedia Foundation’s PR Office is reportedly distributing talking points seeking to discredit me (this is a conspiracy accusation)
2. He made claims about editors without proof that they were throwaway accounts (thus erroneous accusations)
3. He called masem a rape appologist here [1].

I request that you reinsert my comment with the my accusation that he perpetrated them removed (that is only slight blp violation). Avono (talk) 19:42, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect he is probably right that WMF PR is "seeking to discredit" him as I take that to mean they are just pointing out to people expressing concern that Mark is spectacularly wrong about pretty much everything he is talking about. That said, I think you should lay off him as it is just fueling his ire. Nothing he has done up to this point would be sufficient basis for a site-ban.--The Devil's Advocate _{tlk. cntrb.} 23:17, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah thats probably good advice. I am just worried of the incoming media blitz because of his half truths, at least Arbcom didn't let them get swayed from them. Avono (talk) 23:28, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In b4 "Wikipedia bans five female feminists who were being harassed by throwaway sock-puppet MRA accounts!" and the ensuing "five gals" controversy.--The Throwaway Advocate _{tlk. cntrb.}02:10, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@The Devil's Advocate: You should stick with that new signature, looks good to you. If I were you I wouldn't be edit warning/squabbling with Ruylong on Jimbo's talkpage as the arbs still have the opportunity to vote on your site ban. Don't make a bad impression if you want to stay here :).Just some friendly advice. Avono (talk) 10:10, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Meh, I'm good. Hopefully, the Arbs will understand my concern.--The Devil's Advocate _{tlk. cntrb.} 10:33, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:10, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An RfC has been opened at RfC to physically restrict access to the Helper Script. You are invited to comment. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:27, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki demonstrates again why it isn't good forum software. Just wanted to let you know I re-added the comment. — Strongjam (talk) 21:01, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

F*cking edit conflicts. Thanks Avono (talk) 21:03, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Avono,

It appears you accidentally gave this editor the Gender Gap sanctions notice instead of the GamerGate sanctions notice. Not surprising, as both have double Gs. I hope there are no sanctions regarding the Golden Gate Bridge. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

see T:DSA under GG. I think it is the correct code. ggtf seems to be for the task force. Avono (talk) 09:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In accordance with the GamerGate discretionary sanctions, you are hereby prohibited from addressing or referring to MarkBernstein, from editing his userspace, and from otherwise interacting with him, anywhere on Wikipedia. This is to prevent further disruption caused by your repeated attacks on him and his reputation, and for bringing his name up in unrelated threads while he is blocked. You may appeal this sanction in accordance with the procedure at WP:ACDS#Appeals. I strongly recommend you keep your distance from MB, and I will advise him to reciprocate; there is absolutely no need to attack somebody's person in order to disagree with their opinion (and as a matter of fact I sympathise more with your opinion than with his, but where I have expressed my disagreement, I have argued against his statements, not against his person). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:41, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]