User talk:K6ka: Difference between revisions

This is the user talk page for me, K6ka, where you can leave messages for me. Some friendly reminders before you continue: Remember to add your signature to the end of your message. To do this, first move your text insertion cursor to the end of your message. Then, do any of the following: In the editor toolbar, select the button. Enter four tilde characters using your keyboard. This will look like the following: ~~~~. On a US keyboard, this is done by pressing the following key combinations four times: ⇧ Shift+`. Please see this chart for more information on how to type the tilde character. Your signature will appear when you publish your changes. Please remember the rules around civility and the guidelines around assuming good faith. To summarize: Civility is when you are respectful and considerate of other editors, even if you don't agree with them. Assuming good faith is when you assume that the people you are working with want to help Wikipedia, rather than hurt it. Not following these two guidelines can lead to problems that quickly become difficult to solve. It also makes editing Wikipedia a lot less enjoyable than it should be. Note that I am not an employee of Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation. I am not paid to edit Wikipedia, this is not my day job, and any opinions expressed by me are solely my own and are not representative of Wikipedia in any official capacity. It is currently 4:31 am, November 12, 2024 EST where I live. Talk pages are like email—don't expect an immediate response, especially if it's nighttime! Please be patient. Frequently Asked Questions Here is a list of frequently asked questions I get, and their answers. Q: I am not logged in to Wikipedia, and I got a message from you saying that I vandalized an article that I didn't edit. What's going on? A: No need to panic! Wikipedia uses your IP address to identify you when you are not logged in. IP addresses may be shared between multiple users, or be reassigned to different users periodically. For example, if you are at school or a coffee shop, the IP address you are using is shared by everyone using the Internet there. The message you received was intended for someone who had previously used the IP address you are currently using. If you did not vandalize Wikipedia, you can safely ignore the message. If you get these kinds of messages frequently, you may want to consider creating an account and logging in to it. That way, any messages you get will actually be intended for you, rather than someone else who used your IP address. Q: I am not logged into Wikipedia, and I can't edit because you have blocked me. What do I do? A: See the above: you are probably on a shared IP address, and someone before you was editing Wikipedia inappropriately. Shared IP addresses are usually blocked from editing for long periods of time to prevent abuse. The good news is that you can usually still edit if you log in. If you don't have an account, and cannot create one because of the block, you can request an account. Q: You reverted one of my edits. Why is that? A: Unless I'm reverting vandalism, I usually provide an explanation for my reverts, either in my edit summary, or in a message on your user talk page. There are many reasons for reverting an edit, and each case has its own reason. If you're still not sure why I reverted your edit, you can ask me on this talk page. Q: Are there alternate ways of contacting you? A: For wiki-related inquiries, you can also reach me at the following venues: Discord – I can be found on the unofficial Wikipedia Discord server under the username k6ka. Please do not send me a friend request; just mention my username in any public channel and I'll respond when I get a chance to. Email – You must be logged in and have an email address registered with your account to use this feature. IRC – I can be found on the Libera Chat IRC network under the nickname k6ka in the #wikipedia-en connect channel. Please don't try to contact me regarding wiki-related matters on other websites or platforms.

K6ka's talk page archives

1, 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Hey, I had a question about STiki and it wasn't answered yet in #wikipedia-en on IRC (I'm impatient :P). Does STiki not work on Linux? On Wikipedia:STiki it says "Windows, OS X", but it's a .jar file so I would expect it to work on Linux too. Upon launching it (through terminal (java -jar stiki.jar), I saw it was executing Wine, yet I see no reason for a jar file to have to be loaded using a Windows Program Loader like Wine. :S If you don't know, that's fine, but since you suggested it to me, I figured you'd be a good person to ask! ^_^ Also, unrelated question, can I steal some of the bullet points off of your talk page's edit notice to use on mine? :3 --George Barnick – Talk/Contribs 03:36, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure, I haven't used Linux or Mac OS yet. I'm not sure why Wine is trying to run a .jar file, but that's beyond me, unfortunately.

And yes, feel free to steal any of the source code off my user pages. After all, I stole most of them myself >:) K6ka (talk | contribs) 03:42, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks. :D and yay for stealing things :D --George Barnick – Talk/Contribs 04:01, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also you have two different bullets telling people to sign their posts on your editnotice. Just thought I'd point it out. :P --George Barnick – Talk/Contribs 04:06, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's deliberate. Unsigned comments always drive me absolutely nuts (it's such a simple concept, signing your posts!). Thank God we have SineBot, at least. K6ka (talk | contribs) 11:45, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What did u find wrong in my modification in Barasat Kalikrishna Girls' High School! I know very well what I wrote was true! so my dear friend would u please reply me to ranganzaman@ovi.com . :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ranganzaman (talk • contribs) 15:28, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I left a message on your talk page about that. You failed to provide a valid source for your edit, so according to the verifiability policy, I was allowed to remove it. K6ka (talk | contribs) 16:25, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All men do not keep all women in their so called place with conscious intimidation thru a threat of rape. To argue that point is a sweeping broad generalization that should be noted as such.98.81.157.102 (talk) 18:02, 24 February 2014 (UTC)me[reply]

As we've all mentioned, it violates our neutral point of view policy. Do not re-add without consensus. K6ka (talk | contribs) 18:03, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thankx for the message on my talkpg and for the contributions in general. 37.46.38.253 (talk) 19:05, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. :) K6ka (talk | contribs) 20:29, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, K6ka. You have new messages at Bennettfyffest's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bennettfyffest (talk • contribs) 23:24, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, K6ka. You have new messages at D A Patriarche's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tnx! D A Patriarche (talk) 02:27, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for removing vandalism from Uganda. This is much appreciated, but unfortunately your repair was not successful in restoring the article to its pre-vandalised state. For future reference, it is better to deal with vandalism by checking the article's page history to determine how it appeared before it was vandalised. You can then restore the whole article, or the relevant part of it, to an appropriate earlier version. If you simply delete the visible vandalism then any content removed or overwritten by the vandal is lost. See How to deal with vandalism for details. Sorry for the template, hope this helps. Both the named editor and the IP were vandalizing and it got into a bit of a mess! Cheers. DBaK (talk) 10:20, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Simple oversight. Glad that you corrected it. I don't appreciate the template though - a personally written message would've been better. K6ka (talk | contribs) 11:50, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I suppose you saw the bit that said "sorry about the template" above though? You got a template with a nice personally-written message too. I would have though that was a win-win! I am well aware of WP:DTTR but also of WP:TTR. And I'm quite impressed with bits of DTTR such as "They may also simply be trying to save time by avoiding writing out a lengthy message that basically says the same thing as the template, which is, after all, the purpose of a template." That "they" was me. Which, of course, we have both now undermined with this discussion ... I think I might go and make tea now. :) Best wishes — Preceding unsigned comment added by DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered (talk • contribs) 12:04, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

K6ka, maybe you could send DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered a {{Uw-dttr}}. (t) Josve05a (c) 12:07, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)...and you forgot to sign! Oh brother, you might want to re-opt in to SineBot so it'll sign when you forget. K6ka (talk | contribs) 12:09, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you previously weighed in on the Street Artists Program of San Francisco article's talk page. That article seems like it is spinning out of control from the self-aggrandizing, un-sourced, and clumsy edits of a very persistent individual who may also be running a sock puppet scheme. We really need some help and possibly some page protections for that article which was recently rewritten by a DYK Editor. Are you interested or have any suggestions?James Carroll (talk) 20:03, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no. Not this article again. I wish I could just forget about it...

Dropped in with my comment. I'm not exactly an experienced editor (I'm experienced in vandalism-fighting and in topics that I am interested in, and this is unfortunately not one of them), so I can only do so much. K6ka (talk | contribs) 20:25, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

the fact of the matter here is that my wife worked for these jokers for the first half of last year - and "clash magazine ltd" went bankrupt owing a lot of people (not least the british taxpayer) a huge amount of money

how can a entity like this be allowed to continue unchallenged?

why are you allowing wiki - supposedly an encyclopaedia - to be used for marketing purposes - and not warn others of the dangers of doing business?

i know you think you're doing the right thing - but you're so wrong

i don't really know how wiki works on this level - but i'm very happy to discuss this via mail richard.turner10@luckyfrog.co.uk

thanks 213.42.223.2 (talk) 12:44, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I don't discuss things on e-mail. You can discuss it on this talk page.

Your edit was reverted because 1. It wasn't supported by a valid citation, 2. It wasn't written in neutral point of view, and 3. By your explanation that would be an example of original research, which Wikipedia doesn't accept.

Before editing, you might want to check out the Introduction to Wikipedia, read the Five Pillars of Wikipedia, and, if you still have questions, ask it in the Teahouse, where friendly and experienced editors will answer you. K6ka (talk | contribs) 12:49, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

wikipage subcommissural organ can you help me with the references? if you notice some references are more than once but the wikipage assume that they are difference and they atribute a new number. do you see that in the page? it is hapening with the book that I put in the references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FCULneuro (talk • contribs) 19:22, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Citations are pretty simple, really. If you have one source and it is used only once in the article, just wrap it with <ref></ref> tags. For example - <ref>http://www.awesomesite.com/</ref>. If the same source is used more than once in the article, do something like this:

Will had initially stated that Jon Bon Jovi was an amazing artist.<ref name="enter a name that other editors will recognize here">http://www.awesomesite.com/</ref>.

...a couple of paragraphs later...

Alyssa did not appear at Jon Bon Jovi's birthday party despite being invited.<ref name="enter a name that other editors will recognize here" />

In other words, this will allow you to add the same footnote to different parts of the article. The most important thing is that one of those "ref name" tags have the citation. Once one of them has it, you can just type <ref name="name of reference" /> and the footnote will appear in both places where you put the tags.

Sorry if I'm not being very clear here...you can play around in the sandbox. I've done an example in my own sandbox if it helps. K6ka (talk | contribs) 20:28, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You put my page on automatic deletion. I was trying to do something sweet that nobody else in the world will see. Be nice. Give it a day. Bradyab12 :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bradyab12 (talk • contribs) 16:53, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

From the article...

Hey snobby wiki editor people please don't delete this for maybe day or so. The facts say she should see it first.

So you called me snobby, created an article that doesn't come close to meeting our notability policy, and a message was left on your talk page explaining why it was tagged for deletion. K6ka (talk | contribs) 16:58, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Im dreadfully sorry to disturb you but you recently deleted what I put on the poet/poetry pages. I find this not only to be rude a disrespectful , but it has also insulted my dignity. I happen to be one of the smartest and wisest people on this planet. To have scum like yourself deleting my most wise posts makes me a little angry. Or should I say furious! I have never met such a disgrace to the planet. Anyway STOP DELETING MY POSTS OR ELSE (I'm not threatening you I'm just saying that you can't stop me from editing anything so stop).

Best Wishes, ScrewpoetryScrewpoetry (talk) 03:35, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Screwpoetry, you've been blocked from editing. Have a nice day! Nikkimaria (talk) 03:40, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)Ninja'd! Enjoy your WikiBreak. K6ka (talk | contribs) 03:44, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Entering the English Wikipedia, and not yet personally logged in, I stumbled across your message on reverting an edit in "Pull & Bear". The reason for reverting was very politely phrased, as the contribution was plane vandalism. The IP address 145.118.128.65 however belongs to a secondary school in Rotterdam, The Netherlands, and therefor is blocked in nl.Wikipedia for anonymous contributions. Maybe this should be installed in the English Wikipedia too. T.vanschaik (talk) 11:00, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The edit summary was automatically generated, and I did not write it. We are aware that the IP address belongs to a school see the talk page, but we won't block it until that IP has received enough warnings and vandalizes the wiki enough times. If you think this IP should be globally blocked, you can take it to the administrator noticeboard, since I'm not an admin here. K6ka (talk | contribs) 11:48, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello K6ka. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Dana (Wayside), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to fictional characters, but the article should be redirected to the show's page. Thank you. kelapstick^(bainuu) 17:53, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Four times in a row, you beat me to reverting an edit on Huggle. Awarded to you for outstanding work in counter-vandalism. Stay strong, and keep on going! :) Mz7 (talk) 20:56, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]