User talk:216.164.203.90: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:42, 13 May 2006

Welcome!

Hi 216.164.203.90! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 04:53, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Gray Wolf on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. cholmes75 05:06, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 05:22, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

yeah right, it is complete nonsence. Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 05:27, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong, the next time, you get blocked. Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 05:29, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not as lomng as you are vandalizing the page with adding nonsense. Copnsider to add some real stuff. Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 05:42, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted a recent edit you made to the article Gray Wolf. You did not provide an edit summary, and I could not determine whether the edit was vandalism or a constructive contribution. In the future, please use edit summaries. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. cholmes75 05:31, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 :yeah right, it is complete nonsence. [[User:KimvdLinde|Kim van der Linde]] <sup>[[User talk:KimvdLinde|at venus]]</sup> 05:27, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 ::Wrong, the next time, you get blocked. [[User:KimvdLinde|Kim van der Linde]] <sup>[[User talk:KimvdLinde|at venus]]</sup> 05:29, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
+:::Not as lomng as you are vandalizing the page with adding nonsense. Copnsider to add some real stuff. [[User:KimvdLinde|Kim van der Linde]] <sup>[[User talk:KimvdLinde|at venus]]</sup> 05:42, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 I have reverted a recent edit you made to the article [[:Gray Wolf]]. You did not provide an [[help:Edit summary|edit summary]], and I could not determine whether the edit was [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] or a constructive contribution. In the future, please [[help:Edit summary|use edit summaries]]. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gray_Wolf&diff=next&oldid=52957949 link]. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. <!-- 138--> [[User:Cholmes75|cholmes75]] 05:31, 13 May 2006 (UTC)