Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/log/April 2010: Difference between revisions
speedy delist 1 |
delist 1 |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Kept== |
==Kept== |
||
==Delisted== |
==Delisted== |
||
{{Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Carrie Underwood discography/archive1}} |
|||
{{Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of Interstate and U.S. highways in Maryland/archive1}} |
{{Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of Interstate and U.S. highways in Maryland/archive1}} |
Revision as of 03:38, 12 April 2010
Kept
Delisted
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by Dabomb87 03:38, 12 April 2010 [1].
Notified: User:Caldorwards4, User:Eric444, User:I7114080, Wikipedia:WikiProject Music. Another editor contributed significantly but retired in February 2009.
I am nominating this for featured list removal because… wow, there're a ton of issues.
- Verifiability and sourcing
- The Canadian country singles peaks aren't verified by any of the sources.
- "B-sides and unreleased songs" has only one source which doesn't even verify the info cited to it.
- "Miscellaneous appearances" is entirely unsourced.
- The music video table is also unsourced.
- Reliability
- Source 2 is top40charts.com, which has been deemed unreliable in the past.
- Is source 3 (realitytvworld.com) reliable?
- Reference 4 (RIAA database) says "No results found for your search."
- Can we use iTunes links as sources?
- Prose and other
- RIAA should be spelled out in full on its first use.
- There is also a major WP:WIAFL #6 concern, as IPs are fond of changing chart positions without sources.
Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 00:17, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove I can see there's a ton of issues and unless they can be fixed this shouldn't be featured. --Caldorwards4 (talk) 18:58, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove. On top of the issues listed above, Chart Stats is used as a source. Goodraise 22:11, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Why is Chart Stats a problem? Can you recommend a better source? Langdon (talk) 01:34, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It is a problem, because I don't see how it identifies as a reliable source. As for alternatives, Music Week and ChartsPlus spring to mind. Goodraise 03:47, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove I have fixed some problems but there is more to be done, especially the lead. Langdon (talk) 01:34, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by Dabomb87 02:23, 1 April 2010 [2].
I am nominating this for featured list removal because the basis for creating this list was flawed at its inception. There are three basic classes of state highways in the US: Interstates, US Highways and other state highways. This list cherry-picked two of the three classes to the exclusion of the third. Recently, editors in Maryland have overhauled the lists for the state highway network, which included the creation of List of Interstate Highways in Maryland and List of U.S. Highways in Maryland in addition to List of Maryland state highways, the latter of which is actually the summary article for 5 sub-lists because there are so many numbered components in the state highway system in Maryland. Because of these changes, I advocate that this list have its featured status removed before it is sent to AfD, or another appropriate forum for disposal. Imzadi1979 (talk) 18:18, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Please notify involved editors and WikiProjects, and list them at the top of this page per FLRC instructions. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:47, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdrawing – per TenPoundHammer's comments, I've instead just taken the article direct to WP:AFD. Imzadi1979 (talk) 22:25, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I am boldly speedy delisting this, since this list is clearly redundant. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:21, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.