Wikipedia:Requested moves: Difference between revisions

Administrator instructions

This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared.

Requested moves is a process for requesting the retitling (moving) of an article, template, or project page on Wikipedia. For retitling files, categories and other items, see When not to use this page.

Please read the article titling policy and the guideline regarding primary topics before moving a page or requesting a page move.

Any autoconfirmed user can use the Move function to perform most moves (see Help:How to move a page). If you have no reason to expect a dispute concerning a move, be bold and move the page. However, it may not always be possible or desirable to do this:

• Technical reasons may prevent a move; for example, a page may already exist at the target title and require deletion, or the page may be protected from moves. See: § Requesting technical moves.
• Requests to revert recent, undiscussed, controversial moves may be made at WP:RM/TR. If the new name has not become the stable title, the undiscussed move will be reverted. If the new name has become the stable title, a requested move will be needed to determine the article's proper location.
• A title may be disputed, and discussion may be necessary to reach consensus: see § Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves. The requested moves process is not mandatory, and sometimes an informal discussion at the article's talk page can help reach consensus.
• A page should not be moved and a new move discussion should not be opened when there is already an open move request on a talk page. Instead, please participate in the open discussion.
• Unregistered and new (not yet autoconfirmed) users are unable to move pages.

Requests are generally processed after seven days. If consensus to move the page is reached at or after this time, a reviewer will carry out the request. If there is a consensus not to move the page, the request will be closed as "not moved". When consensus remains unclear, the request may be relisted to allow more time for consensus to develop, or the discussion may be closed as "no consensus". See Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions for more details on the process.

Wikipedia:Move review can be used to contest the outcome of a move request as long as all steps are followed. If a discussion on the closer's talk page does not resolve an issue, then a move review will evaluate the close of the move discussion to determine whether or not the contested close was reasonable and consistent with the spirit and intent of common practice, policies, and guidelines.

Separate processes exist for moving certain types of pages, and for changes other than page moves:

• Making an uncontroversial move – if you can, be bold and do it yourself! If you can't, see § Requesting technical moves.
• Renaming a category – propose the move at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion.
• Renaming a stub template – propose the move at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion.
• Renaming an image or other file – see Wikipedia:Moving a page § Moving a file page.
• Moves from draft namespace or user space to article space – Unconfirmed users: add {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article. See Wikipedia:Articles for creation. Confirmed users: Move the page yourself.
• Merging two articles – make a request at Wikipedia:Proposed mergers, or be bold and do it yourself.
• Splitting an article – make a request at Wikipedia:Proposed article splits, or be bold and do it yourself.
• Requesting that page histories be merged – list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge.
• Contesting a move request close – use the Wikipedia:Move review process.

Autoconfirmed editors may move a page without discussion if all of the following apply:

• No article exists at the new target title;
• There has been no previous discussion about the title of the page that expressed any objection to a new title; and
• It seems unlikely that anyone would reasonably disagree with the move.

If you disagree with a prior bold move, and the new title has not been in place for a long time, you may revert the move yourself. If you cannot revert the move for technical reasons, then you may request a technical move.

Move wars are disruptive, so if you make a bold move and it is reverted, do not make the move again. Instead, follow the procedures laid out in § Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves.

Only list proposals here that are clearly uncontroversial but require administrator help to complete (for example, spelling and capitalization fixes). Do not list a proposed page move in this section if there is any reasonable possibility that it could be opposed by anyone. Please list new requests at the bottom of the list in this section and use {{subst:RMassist|Old page name|Requested name|Reason for move}} rather than copying previous entries. The template will automatically include your signature. No edits to the article's talk page are required. If you object to a proposal listed here, please re-list it in the #Incomplete and contested proposals section below.

• Brzostek, Subcarpathian Voivodeship → Brzostek — This is the only town of this name. The only other Brzostek with an article is a minor village. — Kotniski (talk) 11:46, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Michałowo, Podlaskie Voivodeship → Michałowo — Michałowo is now a town; all the other Michałowos are small villages, so the town should be the primary topic. — Kotniski (talk) 12:05, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

With the exception of a brief description of the problem or objection to the move proposal, please do not discuss move proposals here. If you support an incomplete or contested move proposal, please consider following the instructions above to complete the proposal, and move it to the "Other Proposals" section below, normally under the earliest date on which all instructions have been completed. Proposals that remain incomplete after five days will be removed.

• Eastern Professional Hockey League (2008) → Eastern Professional Hockey League — As the EPHL (2008) is the current EPHL, the page should not list the former league. I moved that page to Eastern Professional Hockey League (1959-1963), but this page will need adjusted as well. — ABAsite (talk) 23:39, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Incomplete. JPG-GR (talk) 08:41, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Vervet Monkey → Vervet monkey — {{{3}}} — Jacob Lundberg (talk) 16:46, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • And fix the case of Tantalus Monkey and Green Monkey too? Sam⁵ (talk) 17:06, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• No reason given. The capitalized form appears to be used for other similar mammals. older ≠ wiser 17:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• All monkeys use the capitalised form, so this should be declined whether it's considered justified or not. Either they all need to be changed, and that's a task for a bot, or they should all remain as-is. Orpheus (talk) 00:34, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Next Japanese general election → Japanese general election, 2009 — It now being 2009 in Japan and an election being required no later than 2009, it is now certain the election will take place in 2009. — Rrius (talk) 18:13, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is said: "There is many a slip between cup and lip". I have seen so many things go wrong that were thought certain, that I am tempted not to call this a 2009 election until it is happening in 2009. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:04, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • I can only think of two reasons that the election won't be in 2009. 1) Someone changes the Japanese constitution or 2) Someone invents a time machine. I think in either case we can probably handle moving it back, so I support this move. Orpheus (talk) 00:36, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Zero-sum (game theory) → Zero-sum - "zero sum" is a game theoretical concept which is often used outside of game theory. The concept being referred to is not ambiguous, and therefore the zero sum article should be on that topic, rather than being a disambiguation page. Like Apple and Window the article should be on the root meaning with a link to a dab page. A relatively inexperienced editor recently moved this page so that it could be redirected to a disambiguation page on the grounds that the use of "zero sum" as an X-Files episode title, for example, required the primacy of a disambiguation page over a substantive one for zero sum, see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Game_theory#Zero-sum_disambiguation_page for prior discussion,and Talk:Zero-sum_(game_theory)#requested_move for further discussion. Pete.Hurd (talk) 04:29, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Incomplete. JPG-GR (talk) 03:46, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Object there's the zero-sum problem in number theory 76.66.198.171 (talk) 04:58, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Let There Be Peace on Earth → Let There Be Peace on Earth (album) — The album is named for the song and the song is older and far more notable — Lawikitejana (talk) 16:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Let There Be Peace on Earth (song) → Let There Be Peace on Earth — The album is named for the song and the song is older and far more notable — Lawikitejana (talk) 16:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Controversial, as the move has happened before. Best discuss first. Sam⁵ (talk) 13:56, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• 2d Space Warning Squadron → 2nd Space Warning Squadron - 2d is not the proper prefix to the unit. I believe it was written this way due to a typo on the Buckley AFB Website. - DefenseSupportParty (talk) 03:21, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The unit patch has "2d" on it. Seems to be the official way the unit is designated. Parsecboy (talk) 05:07, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the correct template; see the instructions above. Do not attempt to copy and paste formatting from another listing.

Purge the cache to refresh this page

• The commune → The Commune —(Discuss)— Name should have capital letter, but attempt to move it was thwarted because that title is Protected. I can't tell whether that's to prevent re-creation of this article, or for some completely other reason. Article looks OK, has (mal-formed) refs to websites of other organisations which seem to make it just-about notable. --PamD (talk) 15:49, 2 January 2009 (UTC) PamD (talk) 15:49, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Tetrameles nudiflora → Tetrameles —(Discuss)— A genus with one species should be at the genus name, not the species name --Kingdon (talk) 15:38, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Physical Layer → Physical layer —(Discuss)— Caps: this article discusses the general concept, it isn't tied to any one specification. --Underpants 15:24, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• RewirpowerSTADION → Ruhrstadion —(Discuss)— I'm pretty certain that the common name in English for this football ground is still the Ruhrstadion. The sponsored name is only temporary, anyway. --Dancarney (talk) 14:23, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• KEGA → KEGA (Radio Station) —(Discuss)— Needs disambiguation, there is a well known software called KEGA in existence since 2002 which makes it older than the radio station's call sign --84.147.246.114 (talk) 11:13, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Tepelenë, Albania → Tepelenë —(Discuss)— Tepelenë primarily refers to the city in southern Albania. The other meaning (Tepelenë District) is derived from the city, already disambiguated by its generic (district), and rarely used without that generic (except perhaps in lists of districts, where it is clear that the district is meant). And, as was pointed out in a similar situation at Talk:Shkodër, Albania, the disambiguation ",Albania" is unsatisfactory because the district is also in Albania. --Markussep ^Talk 09:54, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• James Hughes (disambiguation) → James Hughes —(Discuss)— move over redirect --Snappy (talk) 09:10, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) -- Per naming conventions, middle names are not used in article titles unless they are/were commonly used to refer to the subject. (Not controversial per se, but I've previously seen assuming incontroversiality to be unhelpful) --DBD 09:07, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Princess Elizabeth Caroline of Great Britain → Princess Elizabeth of Great Britain
  • Princess Louisa Anne of Great Britain → Princess Louisa of Great Britain
  • Prince Frederick William of Great Britain → Prince Frederick of Great Britain

• Hirohito → Emperor Shōwa —(Discuss)— Consistency with every other Japanese emperor page, per precedent set by Catholic popes, George VI and other monarchs who change names for official purposes. --Orpheus (talk) 00:39, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• As I Lay Dying (disambiguation) → As I Lay Dying —(Discuss)— move over redirect --Una Smith (talk) 20:45, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  Not a simple move over redirect. There is currently a dispute over where the redirect should point, to the novel, band, or disambiguation page. -- JHunterJ (talk) 20:55, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Berlin-Schönefeld International Airport → Berlin Schönefeld Airport —(Discuss)— The word International is not part of the name. While the English language does not use the hyphenating system as in <city>-<subdivision>, it does use a system of <city served> <actual location> (usually without hyphen, which would place the two names side-by-side) for airports as in London Heathrow Airport, Glasgow Prestwick Airport or Orlando Sanford International Airport. --3247 (talk) 20:06, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Kaharlytskyi Raion → Kaharlyk raion?—(Discuss) I have a question to users who really know their grammar: Is the "Raion" part of the name written in upper or lower-case letters in this case? I have removed the Ukrainian adjective "-tskyi" (see Kiev Oblast as an example, which is not "Kievskyi Oblast" or whatever here), but I just am not sure about the "Raion" or "raion" part. I am posting my question here in order to gather attention since I think this is probably the best place to gather quality feedback. Thanks everyone. Gryffindor (talk) 19:07, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Fredrik Ljungberg → Freddie Ljungberg —(Discuss)— Per WP:COMMONNAME. "Freddie" is the form used in most references to the player in English, and the name the player goes by. --Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 14:42, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Lloyd's of London → Lloyd’s—(Discuss), Lloyds at the moment bizarrely being a redirect to Lloyd. "Lloyd's" would be correct per MOS. I regard this as uncontroversial but have no idea how to do it. Kittybrewster ☎ 10:59, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• RTM1 → TV1 (Malaysia) —(Discuss)— The television channel has rebranded itself on midnight of January 1, 2009 (UTC+8). However, it currently uses the same name as before, where the destination article has a redirect to the now obsolete title. --HУтaяtalk2mecontribs 21:57, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Skulduggery Pleasant 2: Playing With Fire → Skulduggery Pleasant: Playing With Fire —(Discuss)— The book is called Skulduggery Pleasant: Playing With Fire, not Skulduggery Pleasant 2 or anything in between. For those that argue that the book number should be included in the title of the article, we can always create a page called "Skulduggery Pleasant 2" and redirect it to the real article. --TopGearFreak 19:17, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Shirley Holliman → Shirlie Holliman —(Discuss)— Possible misspelling - in reliable sources the singer's name is spelled 'Shirlie' --Jammycaketin (talk) 19:14, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Rosewood (disambiguation) → Rosewood —(Discuss)— move over redirect, to put disambiguation page at ambiguous page title --Una Smith (talk) 18:11, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• M36 Jackson → M36 Tank Destroyer —(Discuss)— The name "Jackson" has not been cited despite several requests. Never a US name, but this is a US piece of equipment. --DMorpheus (talk) 14:22, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Fruit Machine (The Ting Tings song) → Fruit Machine (song) —(Discuss)— There is no reason to have "The Ting Tings" in the title, as there are no other notable songs called "Fruit Machine" by other acts with an article. --Luigi-ish (talk) 10:43, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Ø Story → ? —(Discuss)— Current name violates WP:TM. The official site uses "0 Story", but the title is supposed to mean "Love Story" (which would need to be disambiguated to "Love Story (video game)" —TJ Spyke 06:56, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Southern European Task Force → US Army Africa - (Discuss)- Command has been changed to a component command of AFRICOM, as cited in article. --207.114.206.48 (talk) 02:46, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• The Cynics → The Cynics (band) —(Discuss)— "The Cynics" should redirect to Cynic. --Korg (talk) 01:18, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Goffin's Cockatoo → Tanimbar Corella —(Discuss)— Proper name used in most publications nowadys ---- Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 22:13, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• ZEKE (band) → Zeke (band) —(Discuss)— --Tim010987 (talk) 21:45, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Richard Wilson (Scottish actor) → Richard Wilson (actor) —(Discuss)— The Scottish actor is far better known than the Australian actor of the same name, so doesn't need disambiguation. --h2g2bob (talk) 18:42, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Shkodër, Albania → Shkodër —(Discuss)— Shkodër primarily refers to the city in northern Albania. All other meanings (district, county, lake, Ottoman province) are derived from the city. The other meanings are already disambiguated by their generic (lake, county, district, province), and rarely used without that generic (except perhaps in lists of counties, districts, where it is clear that the county, district etc, is meant). --Markussep ^Talk 09:36, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Bernama → BERNAMA —(Discuss)— Was originally moved from that capitalization with this edit (summary: "moved BERNAMA to Bernama: It is not usually all capitalise. Only the first letter is usually capitalised.). But it is (nearly) everywhere capitalized in the article and at [1] and that seems to be the preferred form. --Jfire (talk) 06:25, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• God Is Not Great → god is not Great —(Discuss)— clear authorial intent to use a lower-case "god" in the title of the book, which should be respected under NPOV guidelines --CAVincent (talk) 01:42, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Is this even technically possible? I thought the usual method to achieve a lower-case initial letter is the {{Lowercase}} template. – ukexpat (talk) 02:00, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Hydrino theory → Hydrino —(Discuss)— As discussed in Talk:Hydrino theory#Redirect to Hydrino Article, the appropriate location for this article is hydrino because it is not universally accepted that Mills' idea is a legitimate "theory" in the scientific sense. — ScienceApologist (talk) 01:27, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• NOD32 → ESET Software —(Discuss)— NOD32 is now ESET NOD32 Antivirus and there are several other pieces of software, noteably ESET Smart Security, which fall under the description of NOD32 but do not warrant their own article as their is a lot of overlapping content. I propose the current article is renamed to ESET software to better reflect the software available from ESET in one place. --Amhoyle (talk) 00:38, 30 December 2008 (UTC) Amhoyle (talk) 00:38, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Barry Lyndon (film) → Barry Lyndon —(Discuss)— Move back to original name that is now a disambig page. User who moved the page in the first place cites WP:COMMONNAME as a reason, but I think more people are familar with the film and not the book. The film article can have a simple dab link to the book at the top of it. --Lugnuts (talk) 18:41, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Chemical accident → Chemical incident —(Discuss)— Not sure if the page name is American speak, however in Europe the word "accident" suggests that the event was unavoidable. In practice, virtually 100% of chemical incidents could have been prevented --Ronhjones (talk) 18:11, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Intellectuals and Nazism → List of Nazi ideologues —(Discuss)— This is a list, and not a prose article. The consensus on the talk page is for "Nazi ideologues". Someone keeps cutting and pasting the article into new titles, at least twice and they lost the edit history. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 17:54, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Lobbying_on_Israel_in_the_United_Kingdom → Israel lobby in the United Kingdom —(Discuss)— Moved without consensus. --John Nagle (talk) 17:14, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually, there is no consensus to move the article to the name you prefer. Jayjg ^(talk) 04:17, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • More accurate to say the move was made without warning or discussion, against WP:naming conflict and is brought here because we need an admin to do it. CarolMooreDC (talk) 19:46, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Tanimbar Corella → Goffin's Cockatoo —(Discuss)— Goffin's cockatoo is the name used most frequently. --Snowman (talk) 10:25, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Done, original move was controversial. Moved back till consensus is reached. -- Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 18:04, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Terminator: The Coaster → Terminator Salvation: The Ride - The real name of the rollercoaster. Mezelf14 (talk) 08:43, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Panning (photography) → Panning (camera) —(Discuss)— I botched in when I moved from the lame Panning photography before I noticed it had just been moved from a perfectly reasonable place that all the links are to; it ought to go back there, but I made that hard. --Dicklyon (talk) 06:27, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Tennessee coal sludge spill → ? —(Discuss)— Determination on what occurred in the accident —Simply south not SS, sorry 20:08, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the article to Kingston Fossil Plant coal fly ash slurry spill following talk page discussion. --Orlady (talk) 05:07, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Conscience clause (medical) → Conscience clause —(Discuss)— Previous Conscience clause has been moved to Conscience clause (eduation) in light of most likely usage --Bioethica Americana (talk) 23:32, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Insufficient discussion, relisting. Parsecboy (talk) 06:02, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Rock's Peony → Paeonia rockii —(Discuss)— The scientific name is the most commonly used name in reliable sources, most commonly used in the horticultural realm. --Rkitko ^(talk) 04:32, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Gaza → Gaza City —(Discuss)— Simply for clarity between the strip and the city, both of which are commonly referred to as "Gaza" --Anxietycello (talk) 02:12, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Joshua tree (disambiguation) → Joshua Tree —(Discuss)— move over redirect, because Joshua Tree needs disambiguation --Una Smith (talk) 21:08, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am restoring this request. Please note it concerns Joshua Tree not Joshua tree. Several editors opposed to the recently closed request to move the dab page to Joshua tree stated that the ambiguous title is the one with the capitalized "Tree". I see their point. --Una Smith (talk) 02:29, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Euro-Trance → Hands Up —(Discuss)— Hands up is a distinct genre; please see discussion --JPG-GR (talk) 18:03, 28 December 2008 (UTC) Rgs258 (talk) 04:03, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• December 2008 Gaza Strip bombing → ? —(Discuss)— two three name changes/reverts have occurred in the space of just a few hours, apparently two name changes occurred earlier in presumably the last 24 hours, so time is needed to let people cool down and consense on a reasonable NPOV name on this obviously controversial topic —Boud (talk) 02:17, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • This might even need admin help to block any further moves until discussion has had time to take place properly. Boud (talk) 02:23, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    • The original title was Operation Cast Lead. Cajota or whatever his name is changed the title without discussion or notifying the other members (there was a 10 paragraph discussion beforehand). He's saying the title wasn't neutral, which has been proven wrong by several members. The title needs to be reverted back to its original state, then it would be appropriate to argue. 70.181.154.29 (talk) 23:02, 28 December 2008 (UTC) Wikifan12345 (talk) 23:03, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move dated sections here after five days have passed (October 10 or older).

• List of Argentina-related articles → List of Argentina-related topics —(Discuss)— Of the 56 countries of the Americas, 50 have articles entitled "List of country-related topics". The other six countries have articles of identical format entitled "List of country-related articles". In the interest of consistency, I propose renaming the six articles entitled "List of country-related articles" to "List of country-related topics" --Buaidh (talk) 21:43, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Moving this article apparently requires a history merge.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 09:50, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No histmerge required; if you look at the histories, the pages were up simultaneously, and there was never a cut-and-paste move. Since they have always been distinct, there's no need to merge their histories. Parsecboy (talk) 05:56, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Executive Committee of the Privy Council of Northern Ireland → Government of Northern Ireland (1921-1972) —(Discuss)— Re. WP:COMMONNAME --Mooretwin (talk) 17:37, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Amiga Hold-And-Modify → Hold And Modify —(Discuss)— There is no other article that could be called 'Hold And Modify', and the word 'Amiga' is implicit when talking about HAM. I compare this article to the VGA equivalents, Mode 13h and Mode X. Neither of these has the words 'IBM', 'IBM-compatible' or 'VGA' in the title. Also, we need to decide whether we want hyphens in the title. --Richard Cavell (talk) 11:08, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Relisting to generate some input especially on the hyphen question. Keith D (talk) 23:44, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Relisting again to get more input. If still no real objections, then just move it.--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 03:36, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• New Game Plus → clear game —(Discuss)— The scope of the article should be expanded to cover post-game modes, content and unlocks in general. --Gordon Ecker (talk) 06:31, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Relisting to get more input.--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 03:36, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Pirs docking compartment → Pirs —(Discuss)— Pirs currently redirects to Pirs docking compartment, therefore there is no need for the long and non-standard disambiguation that the current title provides. --GW_Simulations_{User Page | Talk} 13:38, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Primera División Profesional Clausura 2009 → Primera División de México Clausura 2009 —(Discuss)— The change of title would bring it in line with the name format of previous seasons as well as make it easily understandable as to which country's professional league is being written about. --JohnnyPolo24 (talk) 11:47, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Autorun → AutoRun —(Discuss)— The official Microsoft name for this feature has a capitalised R. I believe the CamelCase usage is a valid judgement call in this case and is not a violation of the manual of style. AutoRun is clearer and lines up correctly with Microsoft's other feature AutoPlay. All definitive Microsoft sources, especially MSDN, use the term AutoRun for the feature. --Carveone (talk) 12:27, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Empress Myeongseong → Queen Min —(Discuss)— most common term used in the English language for this person --16:52, 24 December 2008 (UTC)Sennen goroshi (talk)

• Rio Rico, Texas → Rio Rico, Tamaulipas —(Discuss)— This city is in Tamaulipas, not Texas --Dancarney (talk) 12:41, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree.[2] Walter Siegmund (talk) 21:24, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Aghstafa River → Aghstev River —(Discuss)— More common in English + official name in Armenia, from where the river originates. --Vacio (talk) 06:13, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The page has been moved by user Parishan (talk · contribs) without discussion [3]--Vacio (talk) 08:27, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]