User talk:CBMIBM: Difference between revisions

Welcome! Hello, CBMIBM, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 15:36, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll do what I can. Thank you for advising me, F l a n k e r (talk) 16:08, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, I hope that now the things are better than before, but I still unhappy with sampi and san. --F l a n k e r (talk) 16:23, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, but for the sanpi I've made it through another way, because the result using the mi was not so convincing. But what about the... "pamphylian digamma"? --F l a n k e r (talk) 17:30, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done also this. What do you thinking about? --F l a n k e r (talk) 21:48, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I use Inkscape (do you know it? It's a very good program, you can download it at www.inkscape.org). But I don't know how to make a TTF from an SVG, anyhow I'm pretty sure that there is something in the net to do so. --F l a n k e r (talk) 22:12, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. --F l a n k e r (talk) 17:37, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've done it. Cheers, F l a n k e r (talk) 21:25, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please leave me alone. I archived the conversation because it was over. -- Evertype·✆ 22:09, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I hope that reasons provided by me in my final answer before archiving talk by you are true and valid, thus I know that I must make Greek Unicode 5.1 font from anew, because status of release of your font is currently still uncertain. Can you at least tell me if these reasons are really valid? Thanks. Excuse for harassment - I only wanted that my uncertainity will cease. CBMIBM (talk) 10:16, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CBMIBM, User:Evertype has clearly indicated to you that he doesn't want your postings on his talkpage. Your postings are also not related to Wikipedia business and therefore off-topic. You are now banned from posting to his page. Any further unsolicited postings to Evertype's talk page will be met with a block of your account. Fut.Perf. ☼ 00:07, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When this ban will be lifted? Is this ban selective/complete or temporary/eternal? I want to know what I can do when I want ask him for Wikipedia or Unicode-related topics? Am I allowed to use email to contact him? I posted before ban on his talk page, because he ignored my postings on my talk page. For information, I'm banned only from Evertype page, but not from other pages, and will never break this ban. CBMIBM (talk) 12:55, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Wikinger for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.Template:Do not delete Mayalld (talk) 13:53, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This accusation is former, false and previously discarded. As additional proof I provide you info that Wikinger asks for changing his name to other than CBMIBM: http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Pro%C5%9Bby_o_zmian%C4%99_nazwy_u%C5%BCytkownika#Wikinger_na_PC CBMIBM (talk) 14:03, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This accusation is now and true. Do you really imagine that making a couple of deliberately contradictory edits would prove anything. Arguing against yourself to prove that you are two people just doesn't prove anything. Mayalld (talk) 14:07, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I want to edit constructively as it is now. I think that WCKinger (all his sock puppets are from Szczecin) is main source of this false accusation: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AEvertype&diff=190616133&oldid=190582928 , and even Evertype reverted his vandal edit now. I really don't break banning me from touching Evertype's talk page. I even made some constructive edits in Greek numerals related articles, and will constructively contribute in future, thus block is unneeded.CBMIBM (talk) 14:12, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I did not consider it "vandal editing". I just thought it was more appropriate to archive the discussion than to blank it. That is all I have to say on the matter. -- Evertype·✆ 16:03, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The "vandal editing" was blanking itself. For the record, even Evertype doesn't accuse me for anything, because I keep the ban. Thus block again is unneded. CBMIBM (talk) 16:09, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It would appear that Evertype told you not to post to his talk page again, for the simple reason that you seemed to feel that you had a right to have the question you asked answered in the way you wanted. He told you no, and that should have been that, but as per usual, you just wouldn't leave it alone! In any case, as I said before, the question here is NOT your current editing behaviour. The question is whether you are Wikinger. It would be far more useful if you would address that issue, instead of trying to tell us that you are no longer a bad editor, and don't need to be blocked. Mayalld (talk) 16:19, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fact that I blanked Evertype's talk is not true. This IP editor that blanked Evertype's page is not I, but Al-Bargit/WCKinger. I don't believe in Islam. Even Whois info provides different origins. As I see, you falsely accuses me both in matter of blanking and sockpuppetry. As you see again, I'm NOT Wikinger, thus I give you extended proof of that fact. I even didn't posted PIE=Adamic things as frequently as did it Wikinger. Wikinger ridiculously ignored all soft bans, while I'm heeding them immediately, as in case of Evertype. My first encounter with Wikinger's ideas was here, when I didn't knew that they are his ideas but I saw them interesting. My next step was googling more in matter that PIE=Adamic, and in this way I found Wikinger's ideas here in Wikipedia as even more interesting to me. As of base-7 system, I really think that God uses not only base-7 system, but all at least 19 systems at least in continuous range from base-2 to base-20, (second ten of numerals can have format from nulleven (0) to ninelve (9) , all between 9 and 10, but then numbers from 11 to 19 should have now format from oneteen to nineteen), because in Bible are base-6, base-7, base-10 and base-12 systems, while Wikinger thought here that God is limited only to base-7 system. As you see, my ideas are quite different from Wikinger's ideas, but in area of roughly the same interest. As you see, I build on his ideas further, as he never ever did. Further proof of difference between blanker and me is here:

• IP of Evertype's blanker: (he broke ban that I keep) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:83.21.62.121 - http://samspade.org/whois/83.21.62.121 Szczecin city - contribs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/83.21.62.121
• My IP type: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/87.96.8.90 - http://samspade.org/whois/87.96.8.90 Warszawa city - contribs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/87.96.8.90

CBMIBM (talk) 16:26, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So, you reckon that the fact that 2 different Polish ISPs are involved proves something - how quaint. This is posted via BT internet, but I could just as easily come in from a different ISP

Oh, and we aren't talking about Evertype's blanker, we are talking about User:Wikinger. Are you claiming that they are one and the same? How would you know this? In fact, how is it that you claim to know that Wikinger's IP address will prove that you are not the same person, given that Wikinger's IP address has never been given out on wiki? The only person who would actually know that Wikinger's IP might cast doubt on you being the same person is Wikinger. Mayalld (talk) 17:02, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to prove it, this is User:Mayalld from one ISP 217.35.113.241 (talk) 17:03, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And this is User:Mayalld from an entirely different IP address! 144.87.143.3 (talk) 17:05, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But at least my interests in numerical systems differs from Wikinger's analogous interests, because are broader. This alone proofs that I'm not Wikinger. I even keep soft bans that he ridiculously ignored. Wikinger was interested in PIE only, I'm interested too in utilizing Greek letters (Greek numerals too) for writing PIE (first alphabet for first language). Thus again differences. As you see, I will heed all warnings, because I want to keep my CBMIBM accounts identical across Wikipedias and don't want to lost my CBMIBM account here. Thus please don't block me, but instead tell me what I should do to avoid block. Can you give me amnesty? In this case it will be worthy, because I can in future make many constructive edits. Both your example IPs come from Derbyshire and London, but my example IPs came from Szczecin and Warszawa, that are distant cities. CBMIBM (talk) 17:13, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can't give you an amnesty for anything, it isn't in my powers to do so! The problem here is that you keep claiming that you aren't Wikinger, and then go on to say that you have in any case stopped the disruptive editing that you used to do when you were Wikinger! The simple fact is that, per WP:DUCK it is obvious that you are Wikinger. Now, there are two ways that you can proceed from here on;

1. Continue in your, frankly ridiculous, claim that you are not Wikinger, and waste the time of a lot of people proving that you are in fact Wikinger.
2. Show a bit of respect for the community by being honest about this, and save everybody a lot of time.

Continued denials, followed by proof of your identity is just going to prove that you have not reformed, and will very likely result in an indefinite block. Coming clean will at least show that you are trying to reform, and should avoid the need for an indefinite block. Mayalld (talk) 17:25, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How do you imagine this proves anything? London and Derbyshire are 150 miles apart. I clearly did not travel 150 miles in 2 minutes, to post the messages!

In actual fact, I was sat in Derbyshire the whole time. Yet one of my posts showed up with an IP that says London. It would appear to be entirely unremarkable for somebody located in Szczecin to get an IP address that appears to come from the national capital Mayalld (talk) 17:32, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I hided my Wikinger's former identity because I feared that I will be blocked, but if you told me that if I will reform and admit that Wikinger=CBMIBM, then I will be permitted to be here without any block. If you gave me clear choice, I choose NOW deconspiration and reform way. I really was Wikinger, but to unify my accounts I abandoned my former account and created new one. Please as reward permit to stay here under CBMIBM name. CBMIBM (talk) 17:38, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]