Jump to content

Artemis I: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m clean up
Reverting change to image, which was replaced with "prank" photo edit with a silhouette of a hand in the window
Line 6: Line 6:
| name = Artemis 1
| name = Artemis 1
| names_list = Artemis I<br/>Space Launch System-1 (SLS-1)<br/>Exploration Mission-1 (EM-1)
| names_list = Artemis I<br/>Space Launch System-1 (SLS-1)<br/>Exploration Mission-1 (EM-1)
| image = Artemis 1 Prank Picture.jpg
| image = .jpg
| image_caption = An artist concept of the Orion<br/>spacecraft in [[trans-lunar injection]].
| image_caption = An artist concept of the Orion<br/>spacecraft in [[trans-lunar injection]].
| image_size = 300px
| image_size = 300px

Revision as of 02:43, 5 June 2021

Artemis 1
An artist concept of the Orion
spacecraft in trans-lunar injection.
NamesArtemis I
Space Launch System-1 (SLS-1)
Exploration Mission-1 (EM-1)
Mission typeUncrewed Lunar orbital test flight
OperatorNASA
COSPAR ID2022-156A Edit this at Wikidata
SATCAT no.54257Edit this on Wikidata
Websitewww.nasa.gov/artemis-1
Mission duration26 days (planned) [1]
Spacecraft properties
SpacecraftOrion CM-002
Spacecraft typeOrion MPCV
ManufacturerBoeing
Lockheed Martin
Airbus Defence and Space
Powerwatts
Start of mission
Launch date4 November 2021 [2]
RocketSpace Launch System, Block 1
Launch siteKennedy Space Center, LC-39B [3]
ContractorNASA
End of mission
Landing sitePacific Ocean
Orbital parameters
Reference systemSelenocentric
Period6 days
Moon orbiter

Exploration Mission-1 mission patch

Artemis 1 (officially Artemis I) [4] is a planned uncrewed test flight for NASA's Artemis program that is the first integrated flight of the agency's Orion MPCV and Space Launch System heavy-lift rocket.[5] It is expected to launch on 4 November 2021.[2]

Formerly known as Exploration Mission-1 (EM-1), the mission was renamed after the introduction of the Artemis program. The launch will be held at Launch Complex 39B (LC-39B) at the Kennedy Space Center, where an Orion spacecraft will be sent on a mission of 25.5 days, 6 of those days in a retrograde orbit around the Moon.[6] The mission will certify the Orion spacecraft and Space Launch System launch vehicle for crewed flights beginning with the second flight test of the Orion and Space Launch System, Artemis 2, which will carry a crew of four around the Moon in 2023 for a week-long mission and back prior to the assembly of the Gateway.[1] The Lunar Gateway can further be extended for several lunar missions at a time.

Overview

Artemis 1 will use the Block 1 variant of the Space Launch System. The Block 1 will use five-segment solid rocket boosters producing 8.8×10^6 lbf (39,000 kN) of thrust at liftoff. The core stage will use four RS-25D engines of the Space Shuttle. The upper stage ICPS will be based on the Delta Cryogenic Second Stage (itself based on the design of the upper stage of JAXA's H-II and H-IIA rockets), containing one RL10 engine.

Once in orbit, the ICPS will perform a trans-lunar injection burn, which will transfer the Orion spacecraft and 13 CubeSats on the way to the Moon. If the maneuver is successful, the Orion will separate from the ICPS and coast to the Moon. The ICPS will deploy 13 CubeSats that will do scientific research and perform technology demonstrations.

Originally, the mission was planned to follow a circumlunar trajectory without entering orbit around the Moon.[3][7] Current plans are expected to have the Orion spacecraft spend approximately 3 weeks in space, including 6 days in a distant retrograde orbit around the Moon.[6]

Mission timeline

Mission elapsed time Event Altitude
0 hours 00 minutes 00 seconds Launch 0 km / 0 miles

Location: Kennedy Space Center

0 hours 02 minutes 00 seconds Solid Rocket Booster Separation 45 km / 28 miles
0 hours 03 minutes 40 seconds Service Module Panels and Launch Abort System Jettisoned 91 km / 57 miles
0 hours 08 minutes 14 seconds Main Engine Cutoff and Core Stage Separation 157 km / 98 miles
0 hours 16 minutes 14 seconds Solar Panels Deployed 484 km / 301 miles
0 hours 54 minutes 05 seconds Perigee Raise Manoeuvre 1,791 km / 1,113 miles
1 hour 25 minutes 00 seconds Trans-Lunar Injection (TLI) 601 km / 373 miles
1 hour 53 minutes 00 seconds Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage (ICPS) Separation 3,849 km / 2,392 miles
Days 1-4 Outbound Coasting Phase 3,849 - 394,501 km / 2,391 - 245,131 miles
4 days 7 hours 18 minutes Lunar Gravity Assist Distance from Earth: 401,643 km / 249,569 miles

Distance from Moon: 100 km / 62 miles

Days 7-13 Distant Retrograde Orbit 348,931 - 437,321 km / 216,815 - 271,739 miles
20 days Return Powered Flyby 358,558 km / 222,798 miles
Days 21-25 Inbound Coasting Phase 364,804 - 67,257 km / 226,678 - 21,959 miles
25 days 11 hours 30 minutes Crew and Service Module Separation 5,140 km / 3,194 miles
25 days 11 hours 34 minutes Re-entry 100 km / 62 miles
Re-entry 80 km / 50 miles
≈25 days 12 hours Parachute Deployment Sequence 7,315 m / 24,000 ft
≈25 days 12 hours Splashdown 0 km / 0 miles

Location: Pacific Ocean

History

View of the Artemis 1 mission as it was planned in May 2019.

The flight now named Artemis 1, was originally named by NASA Exploration Mission 1 (EM-1) in 2012, when it was set to launch in 2017 as the first planned flight of the Space Launch System and the second uncrewed test flight of the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle where Orion was to perform a circumlunar trajectory during a seven-day mission.[3][7] Before then, this initial flight had been referred to as Space Launch System 1 or SLS-1.

On 16 January 2013, NASA announced that the European Space Agency will build the European Service Module based on its Automated Transfer Vehicle (ATV), so the flight could also be regarded as a test of ESA hardware as well as American, and of how the ESA components interact with the American Orion components.[8]

The Exploration Flight Test 1 (EFT-1) flight article was consciously constructed[when?] in a way that if all the missing components (seats, life support systems) were added, it would not meet the mass target.[citation needed]

In January 2015, NASA and Lockheed Martin announced that the primary structure in the Orion spacecraft would be up to 25% lighter compared to the previous one. This would be achieved by reducing the number of cone panels from six (EFT-1) to three (EM-1), reducing the total number of welds from 19 to 7,[9] saving the additional mass of the weld material. Other savings would be due to revising its various components and wiring. For Artemis 1, the Orion spacecraft will be outfitted with a complete life support system and crew seats, but will be left uncrewed.[10] On the seats, two mannequins will be strapped and used as radiation imaging phantoms.[11]

In July 2014, the planned initial launch date had slipped to November 2018, and in April 2017, NASA further delayed the planned date to "sometime in 2019".[12][13] In the event, the 2019 planned launch date did not hold, and the maiden launch of SLS was subsequently further delayed; as of May 2020, it is currently planned for 4 November 2021, though it could be delayed to 2022.[2]

On 30 November 2020, it was reported that NASA and Lockheed Martin had found a failure with a component in one of the Orion spacecraft's power data units. Engineers working on Orion stated it could take months to replace the component, casting doubt on whether NASA can launch the Artemis 1 mission in November 2021. However, NASA later clarified that it does not expect the issue to affect the Artemis 1 launch date.[14][15]

Then-planned launch date history
Year Planned launch date
July 2011 December 2017
July 2014 November 2018
April 2016 September 2018
April 2017 2019
March 2018 December 2019
May 2018 June 2020
September 2019 November 2020
February 2020 April 2021
May 2020 November 2021 - March 2022[16]

Crewed Exploration Mission-1 study

Welding sequence of Orion spacecraft for Artemis 1

This flight will be uncrewed. However, NASA did a study in 2017, at the request of President Trump, to investigate a crewed version of the initial SLS flight.[17] A crewed version of Exploration Mission-1 would have been composed of a crew of two astronauts, and the flight time would be much shorter than the uncrewed version due to safety reasons. The study investigated a crewed mission even with the possibility of further delays to the launch.[18] On 12 May 2017, NASA revealed that it will not be sending astronauts to space for Orion's EM-1 mission following a months-long feasibility study.[13] The study helped NASA make some decisions related to the flight test such as adding a full Orion hatch onto the spacecraft [why?] rather than a makeshift metal covering.[citation needed]

Alternative launcher study

On 13 March 2019, NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine testified in front of a Senate hearing that NASA was considering moving the Orion spacecraft that was to fly on the first Space Launch System mission to commercial rockets to keep that mission on schedule for mid-2020. Bridenstine stated that the "SLS is struggling to meet its schedule", and that "We're now understanding better how difficult this project is and that it is going to take some additional time". Bridenstine testified that NASA was considering launching the Orion spacecraft being built for Exploration Mission-1 on commercial vehicles such as Falcon Heavy or Delta IV Heavy.[19][20] The mission would require two launches: one to place the Orion spacecraft into orbit around the Earth, and a second carrying an upper stage. The two would then dock while in Earth orbit and the upper stage would ignite to send Orion to the Moon. One challenge with this option would be carrying out that docking, as NASA does not have an ability to dock the Orion crew capsule with anything in orbit until Artemis 3.[21] Since mid-2019, the idea was put on hold, due to another study's conclusion that it would delay the mission further.[22] The plan was eventually scrapped when it was determined that it would be difficult to have Orion rendezvous with its interim cryogenic propulsion stage in low Earth orbit.

Launch Campaign

Launch preparations for Artemis 1 at KSC officially began on June 12, 2020 with the arrival of the solid rocket booster segments from Utah by rail.[23] Later in the summer the launch vehicle stage adapter arrived at the launch site on the Pegasus barge and was brought into the VAB for storage prior to stacking.[24] NASA and ground systems contractor Jacobs began the build up of the Artemis 1 stack in High bay 3 of the VAB, with the stacking of the two aft solid rocket booster segments on November 23.[25] Following a pause in stacking due to core stage testing delays at Stennis space center, stacking operations resumed on January 7, 2021.[26] On March 3 the two solid rocket boosters completed stacking on the SLS mobile launcher.

The Artemis 1 Orion spacecraft began fueling and pre-launch servicing in the MPPF on January 16 following a handover to exploration ground systems.[27][28]

The SLS core stage for the mission (CS-1) arrived at the launch site on the Pegasus barge on April 27, following a successful green run hotfire test. It was moved to the VAB low bay for stacking preparations on April 29.[29] It is currently expected to be stacked with the solid rocket boosters in the first week of June 2021.[30] The stacking of the Orion spacecraft on top of the SLS core stage is scheduled for early-mid July 2021.

SLS Artemis I stacking[31]
Number Event Status
1 Booster Stacking  Completed
2 Core Stage Stacking  Not done
3 Stage Adapter (LVSA) stacking  Not done
4 ICPS (Stage 2) stacking  Not done
5 Spacecraft Adapter stacking  Not done
6 Orion and Launch Abort System stacked  Not done

Orion payloads

AstroRad vest on ISS

NASA has partnered with the German Aerospace Center (DLR) and the Israel Space Agency (ISA) in conjunction with StemRad and Lockheed Martin to perform the Matroshka AstroRad Radiation Experiment (MARE), which will measure tissue radiation dose deposition aboard Artemis 1 and test the effectiveness of the AstroRad radiation vest in the radiation environment beyond low Earth orbit. While radiation shielding strategies of the past have relied on storm shelters in which astronauts can seek refuge when solar storms erupt, the AstroRad's ergonomic design provides a mobile protection system with a similar shielding factor as storm shelters without hindering the astronauts' ability to perform their tasks.[32]

The crew compartment of the uncrewed Artemis 1 Orion spacecraft will include two female mannequin imaging phantoms which will be exposed to the radiation environment along the lunar orbit, including solar storms and galactic cosmic rays. One phantom will be shielded with the AstroRad vest and the other will be left unprotected. The phantoms provide the opportunity to precisely measure radiation exposure not only at the surface of the body but also at the exact location of sensitive organs and tissues inside the human body. Radiation exposure will be measured with the implementation of both passive and active dosimeters intentionally distributed throughout the inside of the anthropomorphic phantoms at precise locations of sensitive tissues and high stem cell concentrations.[33][34] The results of MARE should enable Orion as a platform for other scientific experiments, provide accurate radiation risk projections of deep space exploration, and validate the protective properties of the AstroRad vest.[35] Also aboard the capsule will be a digital copy of the 14,000 entries for the Moon Pod Essay Contest hosted by Future Engineers for NASA[36]

Secondary payloads

MPCV Stage Adapter for 13 CubeSat spring-loaded dispensers

Thirteen low-cost CubeSat missions were competitively selected as secondary payloads on Exploration Mission-1, later Artemis 1.[37] All of them have the six-unit configuration,[38] and will reside within the second stage on the launch vehicle from which they will be deployed. Two CubeSats have been selected through NASA's Next Space Technologies for Exploration Partnerships, three through the Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate, two through the Science Mission Directorate, and three were chosen from submissions by NASA's international partners. The CubeSat spacecraft selected are:[39][40]

The remaining three slots were selected through a competition pitting CubeSat teams from the United States against each other in a series of ground tournaments called 'NASA's Cube Quest Challenge',[49][50] and were announced by NASA Ames on 8 June 2017. The competition was to contribute to opening deep-space exploration to non-government spacecraft. These slots were awarded to:[51]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b Clark, Stephen (18 May 2020). "NASA will likely add a rendezvous test to the first piloted Orion space mission". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved 19 May 2020.
  2. ^ a b c "Ten month schedule to ready SLS for Artemis 1 launch after Core Stage arrives at KSC". NASASpaceFlight.com. 3 May 2021. Retrieved 4 May 2021.
  3. ^ a b c Hill, Bill (March 2012). "Exploration Systems Development Status" (PDF). NASA Advisory Council. Retrieved 21 July 2012. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  4. ^ Artemis : brand book (Report). Washington, D.C.: NASA. 2019. NP-2019-07-2735-HQ. MISSION NAMING CONVENTION. While Apollo mission patches used numbers and roman numerals throughout the program, Artemis mission names will use a roman numeral convention. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  5. ^ Grush, Loren (17 May 2019). "NASA Administrator on new Moon plan: "We're doing this in a way that's never been done before"". The Verge. Retrieved 17 May 2019.
  6. ^ a b "The Ins and Outs of NASA's First Launch of SLS and Orion". NASA. 27 November 2015. Retrieved 3 May 2016. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  7. ^ a b Singer, Jody (25 April 2012). "Status of NASA's Space Launch System" (PDF). University of Texas. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 December 2013. Retrieved 5 August 2012.
  8. ^ "Engineers resolve Orion will 'lose weight' in 2015". NASA. 16 January 2013. Retrieved 22 March 2013. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  9. ^ Barrett, Josh (13 January 2015). "Orion program manager talks EFT-1 in Huntsville". WAAY. Archived from the original on 18 January 2015. Retrieved 14 January 2015.
  10. ^ "Engineers resolve Orion will 'lose weight' in 2015". WAFF. 13 January 2015. Retrieved 15 January 2015.
  11. ^ Berger, Thomas (2017). Exploration Missions and Radiation (PDF). International Symposium for Personal and Commercial Spaceflight 11–12 October 2017 Las Cruces, New Mexico. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 June 2018. Retrieved 22 June 2018.
  12. ^ Clark, Stephen (28 April 2017). "NASA confirms first flight of Space Launch System will slip to 2019". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved 18 May 2020.
  13. ^ a b Gebhardt, Chris (12 May 2017). "NASA will not put a crew on EM-1, cites cost – not safety – as main reason". NASASpaceFlight.com. Retrieved 19 May 2020.
  14. ^ Grush, Loren (30 November 2020). "Component failure in NASA's deep-space crew capsule could take months to fix". The Verge. Retrieved 3 December 2020.
  15. ^ @Free_Space (7 December 2020). "Issue with Orion power distribution unit "We really don't think it's going to be a big impact on the final schedule for the Artemis I flight", @NASA's Ken Bowersox tells reporters" (Tweet). Retrieved 9 December 2020 – via Twitter.
  16. ^ Sloss, Philip (31 May 2021). "NASA evaluating schedule, launch date forecasts for Artemis 2". NASASpaceFlight.com. Retrieved 2 June 2021.
  17. ^ Dunbar, Brian, ed. (15 February 2017). "NASA to Study Adding Crew to First Flight of SLS and Orion". NASA. Retrieved 15 February 2017. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  18. ^ Warner, Cheryl (24 February 2017). "NASA Kicks Off Study to Add Crew to First Flight of Orion, SLS". NASA. Retrieved 27 February 2017. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  19. ^ King, Ledyard (14 May 2019). "NASA names new moon landing mission 'Artemis' as Trump administration asks for $1.6 billion". USA Today. Retrieved 29 August 2020.
  20. ^ Grush, Loren (18 July 2019). "NASA's daunting to-do list for sending people back to the Moon". The Verge. Retrieved 29 August 2020.
  21. ^ Foust, Jeff, ed. (13 March 2019). "NASA considering flying Orion on commercial launch vehicles". SpaceNews. Retrieved 13 March 2019.
  22. ^ Sloss, Philip (19 April 2019). "NASA Launch Services Program outlines the alternative launcher review for EM-1". NASASpaceFlight.com. Retrieved 9 June 2019.
  23. ^ Sloss, Philip (19 June 2020). "EGS begins Artemis 1 launch processing of SLS Booster hardware".
  24. ^ Sloss, Philip (5 August 2020). "LVSA arrives at KSC, NASA EGS readies final pre-stacking preparations for Artemis 1".
  25. ^ Sloss, Philip (27 November 2020). "EGS, Jacobs begin vehicle integration for Artemis 1 launch".
  26. ^ Sloss, Philip (4 December 2020). "New Artemis 1 schedule uncertainty as NASA EGS ready to continue SLS Booster stacking".
  27. ^ Sloss, Philip (27 March 2021). "EGS synchronizing Artemis 1 Orion, SLS Booster preps with Core Stage schedule".
  28. ^ Bergin, Chris (29 March 2021). "Following troubled childhood, Orion trio preparing for flight".
  29. ^ Sloss, Philip (6 May 2021). "NASA EGS, Jacobs preparing SLS Core Stage for Artemis 1 stacking".
  30. ^ @StephenClark1 (25 May 2021). "NASA's Kathy Lueders tells a National Academies board that stacking of the SLS core stage for the Artemis 1 mission is scheduled next week, running a few days ahead of schedule for a best-case launch date in November" (Tweet). Retrieved 3 June 2021 – via Twitter.
  31. ^ Harbaugh, Jennifer (27 April 2021). "Path to the Pad: NASA Moon Rocket Comes Together for Artemis". NASA. Retrieved 26 May 2021.
  32. ^ Pasztor, Andy (17 April 2018). "U.S., Israeli Space Agencies Join Forces to Protect Astronauts From Radiation". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved 21 June 2018.
  33. ^ Berger, Thomas (2017). Exploration Missions and Radiation (PDF). International Symposium for Personal and Commercial Spaceflight 11–12 October 2017 Las Cruces, New Mexico. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 June 2018. Retrieved 22 June 2018.
  34. ^ Berger, Thomas (2017). "ISPCS 2017 - Thomas Berger 'Exploration Missions and Radiation'". youtube.com. International Symposium for Personal and Commercial Spaceflight.
  35. ^ International Science Aboard Orion EM-1: The Matroshka AstroRad Radiation Experiment (MARE) Payload Gaza, Razvan, 42nd COSPAR Scientific Assembly Held 14–22 July 2018, in Pasadena, California, USA, Abstract id. F2.3-20-18
  36. ^ "Future Engineers :: Moon Pod Essay Contest". Retrieved 24 March 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  37. ^ Healy, Angel (4 February 2016). "Boeing-Built Rocket to Carry Lockheed Martin's Skyfire CubeSat". GovConWire. Retrieved 5 February 2016.
  38. ^ Foust, Jeff (8 August 2019). "NASA seeking proposals for cubesats on second SLS launch". SpaceNews. Retrieved 29 August 2020. Unlike Artemis 1, which will fly six-unit cubesats only...
  39. ^ Hambleton, Kathryn; Newton, Kim; Ridinger, Shannon (2 February 2016). "NASA Space Launch System's First Flight to Send Small Sci-Tech Satellites into Space". NASA. Retrieved 3 February 2016. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  40. ^ a b Ricco, Tony (2014). "BioSentinel: DNA Damage-and-Repair Experiment Beyond Low Earth Orbit" (PDF). NASA Ames Research Center. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 May 2015. Retrieved 25 May 2015.
  41. ^ a b c Hambleton, Kathryn; Henry, Kim; McMahan, Tracy (26 May 2016). "International Partners Provide CubeSats for SLS Maiden Flight". NASA. Retrieved 15 February 2017. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  42. ^ Frazier, Sarah (2 February 2016). "Heliophysics CubeSat to Launch on NASAs SLS". NASA. Retrieved 5 February 2016. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  43. ^ "Lunar Flashlight". Solar System Exploration Research Virtual Institute. NASA. 2015. Retrieved 23 May 2015. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  44. ^ Wall, Mike (9 October 2014). "NASA Is Studying How to Mine the Moon for Water". SPACE.com. Retrieved 23 May 2015.
  45. ^ LunaH-Map - Homepage at the Arizona State University.
  46. ^ Harbaugh, Jennifer, ed. (2 February 2016). "LunaH-Map: University-Built CubeSat to Map Water-Ice on the Moon". NASA. Retrieved 10 February 2016. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  47. ^ a b McNutt, Leslie; et al. (2014). Near-Earth Asteroid Scout (PDF). AIAA Space 2014 Conference 4–7 August 2014 San Diego, California. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. M14-3850. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  48. ^ Hernando-Ayuso, Javier; et al. (2017). Trajectory Design for the JAXA Moon Nano-Lander OMOTENASHI. 31st Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites 5–10 August 2017 Logan, Utah. SSC17-III-07.
  49. ^ Clark, Stephen (8 April 2015). "NASA adding to list of CubeSats flying on first SLS mission". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved 25 May 2015.
  50. ^ Steitz, David E. (24 November 2014). "NASA Opens Cube Quest Challenge for Largest-Ever Prize of $5 Million". NASA. Retrieved 27 May 2015. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  51. ^ Anderson, Gina; Porter, Molly (8 June 2017). "Three DIY CubeSats Score Rides on NASA's First Flight of Orion, Space Launch System". NASA. Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.