Wikivoyage:Article skeleton templates

We think it's great to have simple, logical sections to each destination guide on Wikivoyage. This makes it easier for readers to find the piece of information they need on any particular destination. Sure, it cuts down somewhat on contributors' creative license, but the traveller comes first around here. We want travellers to get the info they need as easily as possible.

Yes. Travellers want to have a place where to lay their head, and they should be able to make arrangements in advance, using our articles. If a town has absolutely no places to sleep, then you should note this in the Sleep section (and suggest alternatives, if possible). If you just don't have any information at hand, then leave the section empty, and somebody else will come along to fill it up.

The following sections are obligatory for city articles and should never be removed (although some can be combined, if they'd otherwise be silly):

• Get in
• Get around
• See
• Do
• Eat
• Sleep

Subsections, on the other hand, can and should be removed if it makes sense to do so. For example, Easter Island doesn't need a By train section under Get in or Get around, because it's a trainless island in the middle of the ocean.

A destination guide can have the following headings in the following order. Please see the templates above for which ones are best for use for each type of destination. Article skeleton templates/Sections has some more discussion.

A destination guide can have the following headings in the following order:

• Understand
• Talk
• Get in
• Fees/permits (parks only)
• Get around
• See
• Do
• Learn
• Work
• Buy
• Eat
• Drink
• Sleep
• Stay safe
• Stay healthy
• Respect
• Connect
• Cope
• Go next

Region and country articles can also have the following headings:

• Regions
• Cities
• Other destinations

Huge cities (that have been districtified) can also have the following heading at the start of the article:

• Districts

The main reason we do this is because we don't want Wikivoyage guides to look just like any existing commercial guides. Why not? Well, first, so Wikivoyage looks distinctive. People should see a guide and say, "Hey! See, Do, Eat – this came from Wikivoyage! Those guys rock!" The other is to discourage wholesale copyright violation by well-meaning but ill-informed contributors. We don't want folks copying stuff in directly from their tattered 1974 Europe on a Shoestring guidebook. We figured that if the formatting was different enough, that would be too much of a hassle to deal with.

First, make sure it really doesn't fit in with the templates. Where you can stick it gives some ideas for where to put different kinds of info. Usually you can fit it in as a sub-section of one of the main sections – such as Understand.

If your information really doesn't fit anywhere, discuss it on the talk page, and give an explanation of what it is for. If the consensus is that a new section is required, it can be added to the template.

First of all, make sure that your contribution is really something we want to have on Wikivoyage. Check our goals and non-goals as well as What is an article?.

Anyway, we have lots of articles on places that don't really fit the templates. No worries: pick one that comes close, add sections that make sense but are missing from that template, perhaps even new sections (which probably will be integrated in the standard structure by other editors).

If you really think using the templates makes things awkward, then just start the article without a template. Perhaps what you are writing isn't a destination article at all, but a travel topic article. Those do have a template, but not any standard sections (although our usual ones are used where they fit). You might also want to ask for advice in the travellers' pub.

Well, it's more a matter of the size of the article than the size of the city. But you could break it down like this: small cities are cities that aren't going to have a ton of information on them. We just take some of the most important sections about a city – where to eat, where to sleep, what to see – and put them in the small city's article. Big cities are cities big enough that we need all the sections about a city in there. A huge city is a city that's so big that we can't fit all the information into one page. So we just get some overarching information and highlights about the city onto the main city page, and then put other info into the pages for the districts in the city. So, there's nothing really rigid about the differences, just different ways of writing about the cities. Feel free to add any section heading from the big city template to your small city article if that makes sense.

An article should contain a reasonable number of things to see or do, as one of our goals is to create pages of reasonable length which the voyager can print and carry in their travels.

Often the small city skeleton will be the best fit, if a village, however tiny, has enough to offer to justify an article of its own.

When the one village doesn't merit an article, you can combine a group of small villages, or a town and a group of surrounding communities, to one common article:

• A village which is a suburb of a small city may be simply listed as part of that city. This avoids many small articles which will only have one thing to see or do.
• Collections of rural villages like Rural Montgomery County or Prince Edward County may use the rural area skeleton, or a city skeleton as if the group were one single community.
• A separate section may be created within a city article to cover a small nearby (but non-contiguous) village (or several). Depot Harbour is an Ontario ghost town; we list it at Parry Sound#Nearby. Likewise, the biblical ruins of Nineveh were listed at Mosul#Nearby.
• If a village (with an eatery, sight or lodging) really doesn't make sense visiting other than for people travelling along a specific route, which has an itinerary article, then it is probably best described in that article. If visits from a nearby city are probable, then describe it as a nearby destination as above, and link it from the itinerary as usual.
• Occasionally, a free-standing ghost town in an isolated location may have its own article, even if this means sending the voyager to some other town in search of food or lodging. This may be needed if the village is nowhere near anything else. Glenrio can't be easily merged into another destination as it's an isolated site divided by the Texas-New Mexico boundary. Listing it at Adrian or Vega would force it entirely into Texas, while listing it at Tucumcari would push it into New Mexico. Sometimes the park skeleton is a better fit in these cases – at least check whether advice on park or rural area articles make sense, and add information (perhaps Understand subsections) accordingly.

Firstly, make sure that the island merits an article—we don't create articles for every rock in the sea.

Which template to use depends on the island. If the island is itself a country, like Madagascar, use the country article template. If the island contains several cities/towns that each merit an individual article (like Maui), make it a region article. If the island contains one huge city (like Montréal), create it as a huge city and divide it into districts as needed. An island which contains part of a huge city (such as Odaiba in Tokyo) might be a district itself. Conversely, if the island is small and only has one city, or a handful of tiny settlements, don't subdivide it but instead, just use the small city or rural area skeleton. For example, there's no reason to create a separate article for Spanish Town on Virgin Gorda. If an entire large island or a group of islands is a national or provincial/state park, where any settlements really aren't destinations in themselves, use the park skeleton. If there is a park and a city, consider whether the park can be described in the city article, or whether it is better to have separate articles.

See the external links policy for details of how external links should be used.

To avoid slippery slopes only external links to primary sources are allowed within the body of Wikivoyage articles. A link to a hotel's official web site is a primary source, but a link to a site that reviews hotels or makes bookings is not. There are a few exceptions, see the policy.

We used to have an External links section but removed it for the following reasons:

• It was was being abused by spammers and others who didn't read the external links policy.
• It meant that relevant links to another website got separated from other information in the article.