Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inga (Young Frankenstein)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. KTC (talk) 14:50, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- Inga (Young Frankenstein) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article on a fictional character fails to show the subject is notable separate from Young Frankenstein. Merely appearing in a notable work is not enough, as notability is not inherited. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 22:16, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:40, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:41, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:41, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom (even though she does have a great set of knockers). Not even Dr. "Fronkensteen" merits an article. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:59, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree with the nom. This character is not notable. The article was a redirect for approximately three years, and it should have remained one. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:29, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - Non-notable fictional character. It's okay to leave a redirect. Carrite (talk) 04:59, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
- Redirect to Young Frankenstein. I see a lot of two or three sentence descriptions of the character in a variety of reliable sources, and am tempted to recommend keeping. But I won't take on that fight. I have enormous regard for Teri Garr who originated the role. But I concede that the character can be covered in the main article. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:19, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. While I loved the character, it's not a protagonist or similar major character. Bearian (talk) 19:00, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.