MaxnaCarta

The article Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth and Talk:Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of KwanFlakes -- KwanFlakes (talk) 17:06, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Many of the musicians involved have their own pages, surely making the CHCMC notable by association. And I've already included several reliable secondary sources. - PastelLilac (talk) 23:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@PastelLilaceven if Adele performed a duet with Elton John at my house making international headlines, unfortunately it won’t be notable as notability is not inherited. Sorry. I live in Melbourne, that centre isn’t notable (for the purposes of Wikipedia). — MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 03:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Are you saying I could keep piling on the reliable secondary sources (of which there are many to choose from), and you won't budge from this position? And a one off show in your house is a bit different from a venue used by hundreds of musicians over the span of almost a decade. I take it you prefer your commercial stuff. Kate Ceberano's first band grew out of the CHCMC. - PastelLilac (talk) 07:13, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Those sources do not constitute significant coverage of the subject which is the hall, not the artist who is notable. I won’t “budge” from my decision to draft the article, but another editor will review my decision as it’s now in the draft queue. — MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 09:19, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

The eMelbourne source is merely to show how the CHCMC is summarised within Melbourne music more broadly, and by a reliable, encyclopedic source. It's a relevant and notable episode in the history of Australian music. Or as the Australian Centre for Contemporary Art put it, one of sixteen "defining moments" that shaped Australian art since 1968. And nowhere is the CHCMC referred to as a "hall". - PastelLilac (talk) 13:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello again. I have expanded the draft quite a bit now. I would also like to WP:DRAFTOBJECT for the following reason: per WP:DRAFTNO, "Editors should generally avoid moving an article to draftspace in the following circumstances: ... Another editor is actively working on the article, e.g. ... there have been constructive edits made within the last hour". If you scroll down the edit history, I had made 4 constructive edits to the page in the hour prior you draftifying it. My latest edit was three minutes before. Per WP:DRAFTOBJECT, "Other editors, including the author of the page, but excluding editors with a conflict of interest, have a right to object to draftifying the page. If an editor raises an objection, move the page back to mainspace and, if necessary, list it at AfD." Since there's no conflict of interest (I am in no way connected to the topic, just interested in it), it seems to me the article should go back to the mainspace. I'm confident notability has been established at this point, but plan to keep expanding the article anyway. It's a fascinating topic and there's a lot of material to go through. - PastelLilac (talk) 00:04, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, MaxnaCarta. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Murder of Jesse Baird and Luke Davies, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:05, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth for comments about the article, and Talk:Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of KwanFlakes -- KwanFlakes (talk) 15:42, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, MaxnaCarta. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Qantas Airways Ltd v Transport Workers Union of Australia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:55, 15 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harrolds, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vogue.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pell v The Queen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Alexeyevitch -- Alexeyevitch (talk) 12:23, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Just a reminder that, if you have time, you are welcome to join the GA backlog drive; it runs until the end of October. You are receiving this message because you signed up on the drive page but have not yet listed any reviews. We hope to see you there! Either way, happy editing! —Ganesha811 (talk) 05:50, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article Pell v The Queen you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Pell v The Queen for comments about the article, and Talk:Pell v The Queen/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Alexeyevitch -- Alexeyevitch (talk) 11:23, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 22 October 2024 (UTC)Reply