Talk:Wressle Castle

Wressle Castle is currently a Warfare good article nominee. Nominated by Richard Nevell (talk) at 13:00, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer.

Yorkshire Start‑class High‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Wressle Castle is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Fortifications / British / European Stub‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

New draft

Latest comment: 8 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion

Hello, I've prepared an extended draft at User:Richard Nevell/sandbox. Since it mentions work of the Castle Studies Trust and I'm on the charity's board I would appreciate it if someone could have a look and check that the balance is ok. Then if everyone's happy I'd like to copy the contents over to this article. Richard Nevell (talk) 16:52, 13 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Looks OK for balance at a quick read through. Probably some copy edits and changes needed in places. I could do those in the draft but then a history merge would then be required to preserve the edit history. Keith D (talk) 21:00, 13 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Copy edits very much appreciated! I'll leave it up to you where those edits take place (sandbox or here). Richard Nevell (talk) 21:27, 13 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Hchc2009: do you have any thoughts on the article? Richard Nevell (talk) 21:35, 15 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Will take a quick look on Thursday night Richard. Hchc2009 (talk) 21:50, 15 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Apologies for the delay. Looks balanced and reasonable to me - nice work! Hope the Trust is going well. Hchc2009 (talk) 08:24, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thank you :) I'll copy the text over later today. I'll look for a bit more detail on the structure and see if I can take the article to GAN. The Trust's work is certainly interesting and luckily some of the projects have been fitting with my own research. Richard Nevell (talk) 11:25, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply